Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ergonomic Impact of Multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Noise in Warehouse Environments

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are poised to revolutionize commercial and logistics sectors through their versatility, maneuverability, and rapidly increasing sophistication and decreasing costs. However, these robotic systems also produce a substantial and overpowering level of acoustic noise that can potentially distract or harm humans who are working in close proximity to these UAVs. The aim of this study is to investigate the acoustic signature of quadcopter UAVs under various operating conditions, and its impact on human communication and psychological well-being. A unique design of experiments is developed allowing efficient usage of space and reducing the number of sessions required to complete the experiment. The human study has been conducted with popular UAV platforms in a workshop environment. Participants completed various listening tasks and their scores were compared with the noise signature of the UAV to identify operating factors with significant impact on human hearing and perceived annoyance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basner, M., Clark, C., Hansell, A., Hileman, J.I., Janssen, S., Shepherd, K., Sparrow, V.: Aviation noise impacts: state of the science. Noise health 19(87), 41 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bies, D.A., Hansen, C., Howard, C.: Engineering noise control. CRC press, Boca Raton (2017)

  3. Christian, A.W., Cabell, R.: Initial Investigation into the Psychoacoustic Properties of Small Unmanned Aerial System Noise. In: 23Rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, pp 4051 (2017)

  4. Chrpa, L., Osborne, H.: Towards a trajectory planning concept: Augmenting path planning methods by considering speed limit constraints. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 75(2), 243–270 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farassat, F., Succi, G.P.: A review of propeller discrete frequency noise prediction technology with emphasis on two current methods for time domain calculations. J. Sound Vib. 71(3), 399–419 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fields, J., de jong, R., gjestland, T., flindell, I., J.b, R., Kurra, S., Lercher, P., Vallet, M., Yano, T., UNIVERSITY, R.T.A.R., et al.: Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation. J. Sound Vibr. 242(4), 641–679 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Freed, M., Harris, R., Shafto, M.G.: Human-interaction challenges in uav-based autonomous surveillance (2004)

  8. Giguère, C., Laroche, C., Soli, S.D., Vaillancourt, V.: Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the hearing in noise test. Int. J. Audiol. 47(6), 319–328 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwood, E., Branch, A.: Dynamic Replanning of Low Noise Rotorcraft Operations. In: Vertical Flight Society’s 75Th Annual Forum and Technology Display (2019)

  10. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of Nasa-Tlx (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In: Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. Elsevier (1988)

  11. He, F., Agah, A.: Multi-modal human interactions with an intelligent interface utilizing images, sounds, and force feedback. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 32(2), 171–190 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hongisto, V., Haapakangas, A., Haka, M.: Task Performance and Speech Intelligibility-A Model to Promote Noise Control Actions in Open Offices. In: 9Th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN), vol. 8 (2008)

  13. Hubbard, H.H.: Aeroacoustics of Flight Vehicles: Theory and Practice, vol. 1. NASA Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Program (1991)

  14. Intaratep, N., Alexander, W.N., Devenport, W.J., Grace, S.M., Dropkin, A.: Experimental Study of Quadcopter Acoustics and Performance at Static Thrust Conditions. In: 22Nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, pp. 2873 (2016)

  15. Job, R.: Community response to noise: a review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83(3), 991–1001 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johannsen, G.: Auditory displays in human–machine interfaces of mobile robots for non-speech communication with humans. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 32(2), 161–169 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katz, J., Chasin, M., English, K.M., Hood, L.J., Tillery, K.L.: Handbook of clinical audiology (1978)

  18. Klapel, J.: Acoustic Measurements with a Quadcopter: Embedded System Implementations for Recording Audio from Above. Master’s thesis, Institutt for elektronikk og telekommunikasjon (2014)

  19. Kloet, N., Watkins, S., Clothier, R.: Acoustic signature measurement of small multi-rotor unmanned aircraft systems. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 9(1), 3–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kloet, N., Watkins, S., Wang, X.: Aeroacoustic Investigation of Multirotor Unmanned Aircraft System (Uas) Propellers and the Effect of Support Structure. In: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, vol. 259, pp. 3329–3340. Institute of Noise Control Engineering (2019)

  21. Le Prell, C.G., Clavier, O.H.: Effects of noise on speech recognition: Challenges for communication by service members. Hear. Res. 349, 76–89 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leslie, A., Wong, K.C., Auld, D.: Broadband Noise Reduction on a Mini-Uav Propeller. In: 14Th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29Th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), pp. 3069 (2008)

  23. Maza, I., Caballero, F., Molina, R., Peṅa, N., Ollero, A.: Multimodal interface technologies for uav ground control stations. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 57(1), 371 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazur, M., Wisniewski, A., McMillan, J.: Clarity from above: Pwc global report on the commercial applications of drone technology. https://www.pwc.pl/clarityfromabove (2016)

  25. Miedema, H.M.: Annoyance caused by environmental noise: Elements for evidence-based noise policies. J. Soc. Issues 63(1), 41–57 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore, B.C., Vickers, D.A., Plack, C.J., Oxenham, A.J.: Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(5), 2761–2778 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D., Sullivan, J.A.: Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95(2), 1085–1099 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’brien, R.G., Kaiser, M.K.: Manova method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. Psychol. Bullet. 97(2), 316 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Passchier-Vermeer, W., Passchier, W.F.: Noise exposure and public health. Environ. Health Perspect. 108(suppl 1), 123–131 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Perron, S., Tétreault, L.F., King, N., Plante, C., Smargiassi, A., et al.: Review of the effect of aircraft noise on sleep disturbance in adults. Noise Health 14(57), 58 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Picard, M., Girard, S.A., Simard, M., Larocque, R., Leroux, T., Turcotte, F.: Association of work-related accidents with noise exposure in the workplace and noise-induced hearing loss based on the experience of some 240,000 person-years of observation. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 40(5), 1644–1652 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Punzo, G., MacLeod, C., Baumanis, K., Summan, R., Dobie, G., Pierce, G., Macdonald, M.: Bipartite guidance, navigation and control architecture for autonomous aerial inspections under safety constraints. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, pp. 1–13 (2018)

  33. Puri, A.: A survey of unmanned aerial vehicles (uav) for traffic surveillance. Department of computer science and engineering, University of South Florida, pp. 1–29 (2005)

  34. Sinibaldi, G., Marino, L.: Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small uav. Appl. Acoust. 74(1), 79–88 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smaldino, J.J., Crandell, C.C.: Classroom amplification technology: Theory and practice. Lang. Speech Hear. Serv. Sch. 31(4), 371–375 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Smits, C., Theo Goverts, S., Festen, J.M.: The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133(3), 1693–1706 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stansfeld, S.A., Matheson, M.P.: Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. Brit. Med. Bullet. 68(1), 243–257 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stoll, A.M.: Design of Quiet Uav Propellers. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2012)

  39. Stowe, L.M., Golob, E.J.: Evidence that the lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134(1), 640–647 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tempest, W.: Loudness and annoyance due to low frequency sound. Acta Acust. United Acust. 29(4), 205–209 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wisniewski, C.F., Byerley, A., Van Treuren, K.W., Hays, A.: Experimentally Testing Commercial and Custom Designed Quadcopter Propeller Static Performance and Noise Generation. In: 23Rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, pp. 3711 (2017)

  42. Wu, X., Gong, H., Chen, P., Zhong, Z., Xu, Y.: Surveillance robot utilizing video and audio information. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 55(4-5), 403–421 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yatim, B., Ismail, S.: Manova versus Alternative Methods. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1635, pp. 934–939. American Institute of Physics (2014)

  44. Zawodny, N.S., Boyd, Jr, D.D., Burley, C.L.: Acoustic characterization and prediction of representative small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft system components (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support of this work from the Sustainable Manufacturing and Advanced Robotics Technologies (SMART) center at the University at Buffalo, through its exploratory grant program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA

    Jesse Callanan, Payam Ghassemi, Maulikkumar Dhameliya, Mostafa Nouh & Souma Chowdhury

  2. Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA

    James DiMartino & Christina Stocking

Authors
  1. Jesse Callanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Payam Ghassemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James DiMartino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maulikkumar Dhameliya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christina Stocking
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mostafa Nouh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Souma Chowdhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souma Chowdhury.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Callanan, J., Ghassemi, P., DiMartino, J. et al. Ergonomic Impact of Multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Noise in Warehouse Environments. J Intell Robot Syst 100, 1309–1323 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01238-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01238-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation