Skip to main content
Log in

Using Spatial Uncertainty to Dynamically Determine UAS Flight Paths

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the aftermath of radiation or chemical accidents, responders must rapidly map out regions of contamination as quickly and accurately as possible. One important and relevant statistical method for this kind of disaster response is spatial kriging, which makes predictions based on incomplete knowledge of spatially referenced observations. Given an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) equipped with radiation sensors, we develop a spatial statistics-based approach to optimally map out a contamination field over a geographic region. In this article, we evaluate three approaches to UAS mapping: a Variance Driven Sampling (VDS) approach that minimizes kriging variance, a more computationally intensive Hybrid Entropy Search (HES), and a baseline Levy Flight search. Considering limited UAS range, we also implement a restricted version of these approaches that only considers nearby points. We find that HES is optimal for small numbers of sampled points with the restricted versions of HES and VDS becoming optimal for larger samples. Ultimately, the best method is dependent on the number of samples to be taken, with each method providing clear benefits over a random search in terms of both mean squared error and path length. We demonstrate the advantages of our methodology using actual radiation field test data from the Idaho National Lab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Materials Availability

The data is provided as Appendix B. Code for reproducing results is available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Avionics International: GE-Owned Avitas Granted First Large Commercial BVLOS Waiver. https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/10/19/ge-owned-avitas-granted-first-large-commercial-bvlos-waiver/ (2018). Accessed 23 Oct 2018

  2. Bueso, M., Angulo, J., Alonso, F.: A state-space model approach to optimum spatial sampling design based on entropy. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5, 29–44 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009603318668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cressie, N.: Kriging nonstationary data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(395), 625–634 (1986). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2288990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cressie, N.: Origins of kriging. Math. Geol. 22(3), 239–252 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889887

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Federal Aviation Administration: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operational Approval (2013). http://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/notice/n%208900.207.pdf

  6. Federal Aviation Administration Office of the Secretary of Transportation: Fact Sheet – Small Unmanned Aircraft Regulations (14 CFR Part 107) (2016). www.faa.gov/news

  7. Han, J.: Cyber-physical systems with multi-unmanned aerial vehicle-based cooperative source seeking and contour mapping (2014)

  8. Karakaya, M.: Uav route planning for maximum target coverage. arXiv:1403.2906 (2014)

  9. Marchant, R., Ramos, F.: Bayesian optimisation for intelligent environmental monitoring. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2242–2249. IEEE (2012)

  10. Murphy, R.R., Peschel, J., Arnett, C., Martin, D.: Projected needs for robot-assisted chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (cbrn) incidents. In: 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), pp. 1–4 (2012)

  11. Pasztor, A.: Drones play increasing role in harvey recovery efforts. https://www.wsj.com/articles/drones-play-increasing-role-in-harvey-disaster-recovery-efforts-1504474194. Accessed: 27 Dec 2017 (2017)

  12. Pulido Fentanes, J., Badiee, A., Duckett, T., Evans, J., Pearson, S., Cielniak, G.: Kriging-based robotic exploration for soil moisture mapping using a cosmic-ray sensor. Journal of Field Robotics 37 (1), 122–136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21914. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/rob.21914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein, M.L.: Asymptotically efficient prediction of a random field with a misspecified covariance function. Ann. Stat. 16, 55–63 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Stein, M.L.: Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for Kriging. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

  15. Vivaldini, K.C., Martinelli, T.H., Guizilini, V.C., Souza, J.R., Oliveira, M.D., Ramos, F.T., Wolf, D.F.: Uav route planning for active disease classification. Auton. Robot. 43(5), 1137–1153 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei, J., Chen, Y., Yu, Y., Chen, Y.: Optimal randomness in swarm-based search. Mathematics 7(9), 828 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams, K.W., Gildea, K.M.: A review of research related to unmanned aircraft system visual observers. Federal Aviation Administration Final Report (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers and editor for several useful comments that greatly improved this work.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Daniel Echeveste provided all coding and conducted all simulations in this manuscript. He originated the idea of entropy based sampling.

Andrew Lee provided subject matter expertise on UAS systems and ensured the algorithms provided were applicable for UAS systems.

Nicholas Clark provided statistical analysis and oversight for the project and served as Daniel Echeveste’s advisor for this work. He proposed the initial idea of using spatial statistics to inform flight paths.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Clark.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Disclaimer

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the position of the United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, or the US Department of Defense.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Log Scale MSE Plots

This appendix includes graphs of MSE on a \(\log \) scale, which makes difference in performance more clear.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Plot of mean MSE on a \(\log \) scale at n sampled points for VDS, HES, and RS after 1000 simulations

Fig. 22
figure 22

Plot of mean MSE on a \(\log \) scale at n sampled points for RVDS, RHES, and RRS, with a distance restrictions of 3m, after 1000 simulations

Fig. 23
figure 23

Plot of mean MSE on a \(\log \) scale at n sampled points for RVDS, RHES, and RRS, with a distance restrictions of 7m, after 1000 simulations

Fig. 24
figure 24

Plot of mean MSE on a \(\log \) scale at n sampled points for VDS and RVDS with three different distance restrictions after 1000 simulations

Fig. 25
figure 25

Plot of mean MSE on a \(\log \) scale at n sampled points for HES and RHES with three different distance restrictions after 1000 simulations

Appendix B: Radiation Field Data

Table 2 Radiation Activity data gathered by the team from West Point

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Echeveste, D., Lee, A. & Clark, N. Using Spatial Uncertainty to Dynamically Determine UAS Flight Paths. J Intell Robot Syst 101, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01331-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01331-3

Keywords

Navigation