Skip to main content
Log in

Aspecto-Temporal Meanings Analysed by Combinatory Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is the meaning of language expressions and how to compute or calculate it? In this paper, we give an answer to this question by analysing the meanings of aspects and tenses in natural languages inside the formal model of an grammar of applicative, cognitive and enunciative operations (GRACE) (Desclés and Ro in Math Sci Hum 194:39–70, 2011), using the applicative formalism, functional types of categorial grammars and combinatory logic (CL) (Curry and Feys in Combinatory Logic. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 1958). In the enunciative theory (Benveniste in Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1, 2. Gallimard, Paris, 1974; Culioli in Formalisation et opérations de repérage, tome 2. Ophrys, Paris, 1999; Desclés in Une articulation entre syntaxe et sémantique cognitive: la grammaire applicative et cognitive, mémoires de la société de linguistique de Paris, nouvelle série, tome XX, l’architecture des théories, les modules et leurs interfaces. Peeters, Louvain, 2011) and following (Bally in Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Berne, Franke, 1965), an utterance can be decomposed into two components: a modus and a dictum (or a proposition). In GRACE, the modus is a complex operator applied to a proposition (a dictum) and is generated from more elementary operators of the categories of tense, aspect, and modality. The dictum is a proposition generated by a predicative relation. In this way, we can attribute a semantic meaning to different grammatical aspecto-temporal operators. The applicative expressions of CL can be easily translated into a functional programming language such as HASKELL or CAML (Ro in Les référentiels et opérateurs aspecto-temporels: définitions, formalisation logique et informatique. PhD thesis, Université de Paris-Sorbonne, Paris, 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, M., & Desclés, J. P. (1992). Interaction between lexicon and image: Linguistic specifications of animation. In Proceedings of COLING-92.

  • Bally, C. (1932). Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Berne: Franke. ( 4-ième édition 1965).

  • Benveniste, E. (1974). Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1, 2. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biskri, I. (1995). La grammaire catégorielle combinatoire applicative dans le cadre de la grammaire applicative et cognitive. PhD thesis, EHESS, Paris.

  • Church, A. (1941). The calculi of lambda conversion. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culioli, A. (1999). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. In Formalisation et opérations de repérage, tome 2 (pp. 17–19). Paris: Ophrys.

  • Curry, H. B., & Feys, R. (1958). Combinatory logic (Vol. I). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P. (1989). State, event, process and topology. General Linguistics, 29(3), 159–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P. (1990). Langages applicatifs, langues naturelles et cognition. Paris: Hermès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P. (2004). Combinatory logic, language, and cognitive representations. In P. Weingartner (Ed.), Alternative logics: Do sciences need them? (pp. 115–148). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P. (2005). Reasoning and aspectual-temporal calculus. In D. Vanderveken (Ed.), Logic thought and logic (pp. 217–244). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P. (2009). Opérations de prise en charge et d’engagement: Une carte sémantique de catégorisations opérées par les langues, la notion de “ prise en charge “ en linguistique. Langue française, 162, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P. (2010). Reasoning in natural language in using combinatory logic and topology. An example with aspect and temporal relations. In Proceedings of FLAIRS conference, Florida.

  • Desclés, J. P. (2011). Une articulation entre syntaxe et sémantique cognitive: La grammaire applicative et cognitive, mémoires de la société de linguistique de Paris, nouvelle série, tome XX, l’architecture des théories, les modules et leurs interfaces. Louvain: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P., & Biskri, I. (1997). Applicative and combinatory categorial grammar (from syntax to functional semantics). Recent advances in natural languages processing (pp. 71–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P., & Guentchéva, Z. (2010). Quasi topological representations (QTR) of spatial places and spatio-temporal movements in natural languages. In G. Marotta et al. (Eds.), Space in language, proceedings of the Pisa international conference, Edizioni ETS. (pp. 213–233).

  • Desclés, J.-P., & Guentchéva, Z. (2011). Référentiels aspecto-temporels: Une approche formelle et cognitive applique au français. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris, CVI, Fasc., 1, 95–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P., & Guentchéva, Z. (2012). Universals and typology. In R. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 123–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J. P., & Ro, H. J. (2011). Opérateurs aspecto-temporels et logique combinatoire. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 194, 39–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desclés, J.-P., & Guibert, G. (2011). Le dialogue, fonction première du langage. Analyse énonciative des textes. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Z. S. (1976). Notes du cours de syntaxe. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Z. S. (1982). A grammar of english on mathematical principles. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindley, J. R., & Seldin, J. P. (1986). Introduction to combinators and lambda-calculus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J. (1958). The mathematics of sentence structure. American Mathematical Monthly, 65(3), 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pottier, B. (2000). Représentations mentales et catégorisations linguistiques. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ro, H. J. (2012). Les référentiels et opérateurs aspecto-temporels: Définitions, formalisation logique et informatique. PhD thesis, Université de Paris-Sorbonne, Paris.

  • Shaumyan, S. (1987). A semiotic theory of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M. (1987). Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 403–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M. (2000). The syntactic process. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anca Christine Pascu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desclés, JP., Pascu, A.C. & Ro, HJ. Aspecto-Temporal Meanings Analysed by Combinatory Logic. J of Log Lang and Inf 23, 253–274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-014-9189-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-014-9189-9

Keywords

Navigation