Skip to main content
Log in

Power domination with bounded time constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the power observation rules, the problem of monitoring a power utility network can be transformed into the graph-theoretic power domination problem, which is an extension of the well-known domination problem. A set \(S\) is a power dominating set (PDS) of a graph \(G=(V,E)\) if every vertex \(v\) in \(V\) can be observed under the following two observation rules: (1) \(v\) is dominated by \(S\), i.e., \(v \in S\) or \(v\) has a neighbor in \(S\); and (2) one of \(v\)’s neighbors, say \(u\), and all of \(u\)’s neighbors, except \(v\), can be observed. The power domination problem involves finding a PDS with the minimum cardinality in a graph. Similar to message passing protocols, a PDS can be considered as a dominating set with propagation that applies the second rule iteratively. This study investigates a generalized power domination problem, which limits the number of propagation iterations to a given positive integer; that is, the second rule is applied synchronously with a bounded time constraint. To solve the problem in block graphs, we propose a linear time algorithm that uses a labeling approach. In addition, based on the concept of time constraints, we provide the first nontrivial lower bound for the power domination problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aazami A, Stilp MD (2009) Approximation algorithms and hardness for domination with propagation. SIAM J Discret Math 23(3):1382–1399

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aazami A (2010) Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulation and hardness results. J Comb Optim 19(4):429–456

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins D, Haynes TW, Henning MA (2006) Placing monitoring devices in electric power networks modeled by block graphs. Ars Combinatoria 79:129–143

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin TL, Mili L, Boisen MB Jr, Adapa R (1993) Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placewement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(2):707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueni DJ, Heath LS (2005) The PMU placement problem. SIAM J Discret Math 19(3):744–761

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang GJ (1998) Algorithmic aspects of domination in graphs. In: Du D-Z , Pardalos PM (eds) Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization vol 3, pp 339–405

  • Chang CL, Lyuu YD (2008) Spreading messages. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on computing and combinatorics. LNCS, vol 5092, pp 587–599

  • Chang GJ, Dorbec P, Montassier M, Raspaud A (2012) Generalized power domination of graphs. Discret Appl Math 160:1691–1698

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chien Y-Y (2004) Power domination on graphs. Master thesis, Department Mathematics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan

  • Dorbec P, Mollard M, Klavžar S, Špacapan S (2008) Power domination in product graphs. SIAM J Discret Math 22(2):554–567

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dorbec P, Henning MA, Lowenstein C, Montassier M, Raspaud A (2013) Generalized power domination in regular graphs. SIAM J Discret Math 27(3):1559–1574

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfling M, Henning MA (2006) A note on power domination in grid graphs. Discret Appl Math 154(6):1023–1027

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Feige U (1998) A threshold of ln \(n\) for approximating set cover. J ACM 45(4):634–652

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Niedermeier R, Raible D (2008) Improved algorithms and complexity results for power domination in graphs. Algorithmica 52(2):177–202

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998) Domination in graphs: the theory. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998) Domination in graphs: advanced topics. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi SM, Hedetniemi ST, Henning MA (2002) Domination in graphs applied to electric power networks. SIAM J Discret Math 15(4):519–529

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hedetniemi ST, Hedetniemi SM, Liestman AL (1988) A survey of broadcasting and gossiping in communication networks. Networks 18:319–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karp R, Schindelhauer C, Shenker S, Vocking B (2000) Randomized rumor spreading. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. Foundations Computer Science (FOCS), pp 565–574

  • Kneis J, Mölle D, Richter S, Rossmanith P (2006) Parameterized power domination complexity. Info Process Lett 98(4):145–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C-S, Lee DT (2011) Power domination in circular-arc graphs. Algorithmica 65(2):443-466

  • Liao C-S (2009) Graph-theoretic domination and related problems with applications. Doctoral thesis, Dept Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan

  • Liao C-S, Lee DT (2005) Power domination problem in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on computing and combinatorics. LNCS, vol 3595, pp 818–828

  • Manousakis NM, Korres GN, Georgilakis PS (2012) Taxonomy of PMU placement methodologies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(2):1070–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mili L, Baldwin TL, Phadke AG (1991) Phasor measurements for voltage and transient stability monitoring and control. In: Proceedings of the EPRI-NSF workshop on application of advanced mathematics to power system

  • Monticelli A (2000) Electric power system state estimation. Proc IEEE 88(2):262–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuqui RF, Phadke AG (2005) Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 20(4):2381–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phadke AG (2002) Synchronized phasor measurements—a historical overview. In: Proceedings of the transmission and distribution conference and exhibition, pp 476–479

  • Raible D, Fernau H (2012) An exact exponential time algorithm for power dominating set. Algorithmica 63(1–2):323–346

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Kang L, Shan E, Zhao M (2006) Power domination in block graphs. Theoret Comput Sci 359:299–305

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Kang L (2011) On the power domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs. J Comb Optim 22:282–291

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Yoon YJ, Abur A (2005) Optimal placement and utilization of phasor measurements for state estimation. In Proceedings of the power system computation conference

  • Zhao M, Kang L, Chang GJ (2006) Power domination in graphs. Discret Math 306(15):1812–1816

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Kang L (2007) Power domination in planar graphs with small diameter. J Shanghai Univ 11(3):218–222

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments, which helped us improve the quality of the presentation of the paper. This work was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan under Grants NSC100-2221-E-007-108-MY3, NSC102-2221-E-007-075-MY3 and NSC100-3113-P-002-012

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chung-Shou Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, CS. Power domination with bounded time constraints. J Comb Optim 31, 725–742 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-014-9785-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-014-9785-2

Keywords

Navigation