Skip to main content
Log in

Robust multiobjective portfolio optimization: a set order relations approach

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider Markowitz’s portfolio optimization problem that heavily suffers from uncertainties of input parameters. And based on set order relations, uncertain portfolio optimization problem at various extreme cases is modelled as robust multiobjective formulations. At first, borrowing set order relations, three concepts of set less ordered efficiency are defined for multiobjective portfolio optimization problems with uncertainties. Subsequently, following from Ben-Tal and Nemirovski (Math Oper Res 23(4):769–805, 1998; Oper Res Lett 25:1–13, 1999), several multiobjective robust counterparts are introduced, and tackled by multiobjective particle swarm optimization approach. As such, the properties of the obtained (robust) efficient solutions are further characterized. Finally, the empirical researches from the real stock market show that (robust) efficient solutions based on set order relations are highly advisable for the investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1998) Robust convex optimization. Math Oper Res 23(4):769–805

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Oper Res Lett 25:1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2002) Robust optimization—methodology and applications. Math Program 92(3):453–480

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Brown DB, Caramanis C (2011) Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev 53(3):464–501

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Birge J, Louveaux F (2011) Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer series in operations research and financial engineering, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Zhou Y (2018) Robust multiobjective portfolio with higher moments. Expert Syst Appl 2018(100):165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coello CAC, Ing D, Lechuga MS (2002) MOPSO: a proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. Congr Evolut Comput 2:1051–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 8(3):256–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratab A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In Proceedings of the parallel problem solving from nature VI conference. Springer, pp 849–858

  • Ehrgott M (2005) Multicriteria optimization. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M, Ide J, Schöbel A (2014) Minmax robustness for multi-objective optimization problems. Eur J Oper Res 239(239):17–31

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eichfelder G, Jahn J (2012) Vector optimization problems and their solution concepts. Vector Optim 1:1–27

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fliege J, Werner R (2014) Robust multiobjective optimization & applications in portfolio optimization. Eur J Oper Res 234(2):422–433

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Halassi AH (2016) An attractor-based multiobjective particle swarm optimization. Int J Appl Comput Math 5:1–18

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ide J, Köbis E (2014) Concepts of efficiency for uncertain multi-objective optimization problems based on set order relations. Math Methods Oper Res 80(1):99–127

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ide J, Köbis E, Kuroiwa D, Schöbel A, Tammer C (2014) The relationship between multi-objective robustness concepts and set-valued optimization. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2014(1):83

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Macmillan and Co., Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Tammer C, Zalinescu C (2014) Set-valued optimization. An introduction with applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Köbis E (2014) On robust optimization: a unified approach to robustness using a nonlinear scalarizing functional and relations to set optimization. PhD thesis, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

  • Kuroiwa D (1998) Some duality theorems of set-valued optimization with natural criteria. Rims Kokyuroku 1079(1068):221–228

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroiwa D (1999) Natural criteria of set-valued optimization. Shimane University, Manuscript

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection—efficient diversification of investments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra SK, Panda G, Majhi R (2014) A comparative performance assessment of a set of multiobjective algorithms for constrained portfolio assets selection. Swarm Evolut Comput 2014(16):38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishnianidze ZG (1984) Fixed points of monotone multivalued operators. Soobshch Akad Nauk Gruzin SSR 114(3):489–491

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani M, Aramoon Bajestani M, Baharian Khoshkhou G (2010) A multi-objective particle swarm optimization for project selection problem. Expert Syst Appl 37(2010):315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schöttle K, Werner R (2006) Towards reliable efficient frontiers. J Asset Manag 7(2):128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöttle K, Werner R (2009) Robustness properties of mean-variance portfolios. Optimization 58(6):641–663

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HG, Liang MA (2008) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Comput Eng Appl 45(4):82–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RC (1931) The algebra of many-valued quantities. Math Ann 104(1):260–290

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. evolutionary methods for design, optimisation and control. In: Proceedings of the EUROGEN, pp 1–21

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for financial support received from the 2015 Annual Natural Science Foundation (key projects) of the Department of Education of Sichuan Province (15ZA0383), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71371157, 71671145), Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project (14YJC790008), the Humanities and Social Science Fund of the Ministry of Education (15YJA790031 and 16YJA790062), and the Young Scholar Fund of the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2015JQO010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chen Chen or Yu Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I declare that I have no conflict of interests, financially or non-financially, directly or indirectly related to our work. There is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Descriptive statistics of stock returns

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Wei, Y. Robust multiobjective portfolio optimization: a set order relations approach. J Comb Optim 38, 21–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-018-0364-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-018-0364-9

Keywords

Navigation