Skip to main content
Log in

An interactive solution approach for a bi-objective semi-desirable location problem

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we consider a semi-desirable facility location problem in a continuous planar region considering the interaction between the facility and the existing demand points. A facility can be defined as semi-desirable if it has both undesirable and desirable effects to the people living in the vicinity. Our aim is to maximize the weighted distance of the facility from the closest demand point as well as to minimize the service cost of the facility. The distance between the facility and the demand points is measured with the rectilinear metric. For the solution of the problem, a three-phase interactive geometrical branch and bound algorithm is suggested to find the most preferred efficient solution. In the first two phases, we aim to eliminate the parts of the feasible region the inefficiency of which can be proved. The third phase has been suggested for an interactive search in the remaining regions with the involvement of a decision maker (DM). In the third phase, the DM is given the opportunity to use either an exact or an approximate procedure to carry out the search. The exact procedure is based on the reference point approach and guarantees to find an efficient point as the most preferred solution. On the other hand, in the approximate procedure, a hybrid methodology is used to increase the efficiency of the reference point approach. The approximate procedure can be used when the DM prefers to see locally efficient solutions so as to save computation time. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed method through example problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahuja R.K., Ergun Ö., Orlin J.B. and Punnen A.P. (2002). A survey of very large-scale neighborhood search techniques. Discrete Appl. Math. 123(1–3): 75–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Appa G.M. and Giannikos I. (1994). Is linear programming necessary for single facility location with maximin of rectilinear distance? J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45: 97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brimberg J. and Juel H. (1998a). On locating a semi-desirable facility on the continuous plane. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 5(1): 59–66

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brimberg J. and Juel H. (1998b). A bicriteria model for locating a semi-desirable facility in the plane. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 106: 144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrizosa E. and Plastria F. (1999). Location of semi-obnoxious facilities. Stud. Locational Anal. 12: 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cplex Using the Cplex Callable Library, Version 6.0, ILOG, Inc., NV, USA (1998)

  7. Drezner Z. and Wesolowsky G.O. (1983). The location of an obnoxious facility with rectangular distances. J. Reg. Sci. 23: 241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen P., Peeters D. and Thisse J.F. (1981). On the location of an obnoxious facility. Sist. Urbani 3: 299–317

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karaivanova J., Korhonen P., Narula S., Wallenius J. and Vassilev V. (1995). A reference direction approach to multiple objective integer linear programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 81: 176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaliszewski I. (1994). Quantitative Pareto Analysis by Cone Seperation Technique. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korhonen P. and Laakso J. (1986). A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 23: 161–179

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mehrez A., Sinuany-Stern Z. and Stulman A. (1985). A single facility location problem with a weighted maximin–minimax rectilinear distance. Comput. Oper. Res. 12: 51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehrez A., Sinuany-Stern Z. and Stulman A. (1986). An enhancement of the Drezner-Wesolowsky algorithm for single-facility location with maximin of rectilinear distance. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 37: 971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Melachrinoudis E. (1999). Bicriteria location of a semi-obnoxious facility. Comput. Ind. Eng. 37: 581–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Melachrinoudis E. and Xanthopulos Z. (2003). Semi-obnoxious single facility location in Euclidean space. Comput. Oper. Res. 30: 2191–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nadirler, D., Karasakal, E.: Mixed integer programming-based solution procedure for single-facility location with maximin of rectilinear distance. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2007) (to appear)

  17. Ohsawa Y. (2000). Bicriteria Euclidean location associated with maximin and minimax criteria. Nav. Res. Log. 47: 581–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Özerol, G., Karasakal, E.: Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision making problems with imprecise information. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2007) (to appear)

  19. Plastria F. (1992). GBSSS: The generalized big square small square method for planar single-facility location. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62: 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Romero-Morales D., Carrizosa E. and Conde E. (1997). Semi-obnoxious location models: a global optimization approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 102: 295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sayin S. (2000). A mixed integer programming formulation for the l-maximin problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51: 371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Skriver A.J.V. and Andersen K.A. (2003). The bicriterion semi-obnoxious location (BSL) problem solved by an \(\varepsilon\)-approximation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 146: 517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steuer R.E. (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yapicioglu H., Smith A.E. and Dozier G. (2007). Solving the semi-desirable facility location problem using bi-objective particle swarm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177: 733–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wierzbicki A. (1980). The use of reference objective in multiobjective optimization. In: Fandel, G. and Gal, T. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Theory and Application., pp 468–486. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  26. White D.J. (1996). Rectilinear location revisited. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47: 181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra Karasakal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karasakal, E., Nadirler, D. An interactive solution approach for a bi-objective semi-desirable location problem. J Glob Optim 42, 177–199 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9237-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9237-y

Keywords

Navigation