Skip to main content
Log in

New horizons in sphere-packing theory, part II: lattice-based derivative-free optimization via global surrogates

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Derivative-free algorithms are frequently required for the optimization of nonsmooth scalar functions in n dimensions resulting, for example, from physical experiments or from the statistical averaging of numerical simulations of chaotic systems such as turbulent flows. The core idea of all efficient algorithms for problems of this type is to keep function evaluations far apart until convergence is approached. Generalized pattern search (GPS) algorithms, a modern class of methods particularly well suited to such problems, accomplish this by coordinating the search with an underlying grid which is refined, and coarsened, as appropriate. One of the most efficient subclasses of GPS algorithms, known as the surrogate management framework (SMF; see Booker et al. in Struct Multidiscip Optim 17:1–13, 1999), alternates between an exploratory search over an interpolating function which summarizes the trends exhibited by existing function evaluations, and an exhaustive poll which checks the function on neighboring points to confirm or confute the local optimality of any given candidate minimum point (CMP) on the underlying grid. The original SMF algorithm implemented a GPS step on an underlying Cartesian grid, augmented with a Kriging-based surrogate search. Rather than using the n-dimensional Cartesian grid (the typical choice), the present work introduces for this purpose the use of lattices derived from n-dimensional sphere packings. As reviewed and analyzed extensively in Part I of this series (see Belitz, PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 2011, Chap. 2), such lattices are significantly more uniform and have many more nearest neighbors than their Cartesian counterparts. Both of these facts make them far better suited for coordinating GPS algorithms, as demonstrated here in a variety of numerical tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson M.A., Audet C., Dennis J.E., Le Digabel S.: OrthoMads: a deterministic Mads instance with orthogonal directions. SIAM J. Optim 20, 948–966 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audet, C., Dennis, J.E. Jr.: Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM Optim. (2006)

  • Belitz, P: Applications on multi-dimensional sphere packings: derivative-free optimization. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego (2011)

  • Booker A., Dennis J.R., Frank P., Serafini D., Torczon V., Trosset M.: A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 17, 1–13 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway J.H., Sloane N.J.A.: Sphere Packings, Lattices, and Groups. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coope I.D., Price C.J.: On the convergence of grid-based methods for unconstrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 11, 859–869 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox D.D., John S.: SDO: a statistical method for global optimization. In: Alexandrov, N., Hussaini, M.Y. (eds) Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, pp. 315–329. SIAM, Philadelphia (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, J.F. IV: Global Rd optimization when probes are expensive: the GROPE algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 1, pp. 577–582. Chicago (1992)

  • Ermoliev Y.: Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization. Springer, New York (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fejes Tóth L.: Perfect distribution of points on a sphere. Periodica Mathematica Hungarica 1, 25–33 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks E.H., Srivastav R.M.: An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones D.R.: A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J. Global Optim. 21, 345–383 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948. v.4. (1995)

  • Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D. Jr., Vecchi M.P.: Optimization vi simulated annealing. Science 20(4598), 671–680 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krige D.G.: A statistical approach to some mine valuations and allied problems at the Witwatersrand. Master’s thesis of the University of Witwatersrand, South Africa (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushner H.J.: A new method of locating the maximum point of an arbitrary multipeak curve in the presence of noise. J. Basic Eng. 86, 97–106 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden A.L., Vignon-Clementel I.E., Chan F., Feinstein J.A., Tyalor C.A.: Trailing-edge noise reduction using derivative-free optimization and large-eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 250–263 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G.: Principles of geostatistics. Econ. Geol. 58, 1246–1266 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J.: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Techonometrics 21, 239–245 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschkowski H.: Ungelöste und unlösbare Probleme der Geometrie. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1960)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mockus J.: Application of Bayesian approach to numerical methods of global and stochastic optimization. J. Global Optim. 4, 347–365 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder J.A., Mead R.: A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 308–313 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perttunen, C.: A computational geometric approach to feasible region division in constrained global optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (1991)

  • Rasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spendley W., Hext G.R., Himsworth F.R.: Sequential application of simplex designs in optimisation and evolutionary operation. Technometrics 4, 441–461 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckman B.E.: A global search method for optimizing nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18, 965–977 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammes P.M.L.: On the origin of number and arrangement of the places of exit on the surface of pollen-grains. Recueil des travaux botaniques néerlandais 27, 1–84 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J.J.: On the structure of the atom: an investigation of the stability and periods of oscillation of a number of corpuscles arranged at equal intervals around the circumference of a circle; with application of the results to the theory of atomic structure. Philos. Mag. Ser. 6 7(39), 237–265 (1904)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torczon V.: On the convergence of pattern search algorithms. SIAM J. Optim. 7, 1–25 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torn A., Zilinskas A.: Global Optimization. Springer, Berlin (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W., Feinstein J.A., Marsden A.L.: Constrained optimization of an idealized Y-shaped baffle for the Fontan surgery at rest and exercise. CMAME 199, 2135–2149 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Bewley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belitz, P., Bewley, T. New horizons in sphere-packing theory, part II: lattice-based derivative-free optimization via global surrogates. J Glob Optim 56, 61–91 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9866-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9866-7

Keywords

Navigation