Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic optimal portfolio with maximum absolute deviation model

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new dynamic portfolio selection model is established. Different from original consideration that risk is defined as the variance of terminal wealth, the total risk is defined as the average of the sum of maximum absolute deviation of all assets in all periods. At the same time, noticing that the risk during the period is so high that the investor may go bankrupt, a maximum risk level is given to control risk in every period. By introducing an auxiliary problem, the optimal strategy is deduced via the dynamic programming method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cai X.Q., Teo K.L., Yang X.Q., Zhou X.Y.: Portfolio optimization under a minimax rule. Manag. Sci. 46, 957–972 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein C.D., Thapa M.N.: Notes: a reformulation of a mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model. Manag. Sci. 39, 1552–1553 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H.: Piecewise linear risk functions and portfolio optimization. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jpn. 33, 139–156 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno H., Shirakawa H.: Equilibrium rcations in the mean-absolute deviation capital market. Finan. Eng. Jpn. Mark. 1, 21–35 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H., Yamazaki H.: Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Manag. Sci. 37, 519–529 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, G., Van Moeseke, P.: Portfolios with reserve coefficient. Metroecon. 31, 103–118 (1979) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meca.1979.31.issue-1/issuetoc

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy H.: Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manag. Sci. 38, 555–593 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D., Ng W.K.: Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: multi-period mean-variance formulation. Math. Finan. 10, 387–406 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X., Zhou X.Y., Lim A.E.B.: Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with no-shorting constraints. SIAM J. Control Optim. 40, 1540–1555 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H.M.: Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W., Ruszczynski, A.: From Stochastic Dominance to Mean-Risk Model: Semideviations as Risk Measures. Interim Report IR-97-027, IIASA, Laxenburg (1997)

  • Ogryczak O., Ruszczynski A.: From stockastic dominance mean-risk model: semi-deviation as risk measure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 116, 33–50 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak O., Ruszczynski A.: On constancy of stochastic dominance and mean-semidevriation models. Math. Program. Ser. B 89, 217–232 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf M., Wolter H.J., Zimmermann H.: A linear model for tracking error minimization. J. Banking Finan. 23, 85–103 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo K.L., Yang X.Q.: Portfolio selection problem with minimax type risk function. Ann. Oper. Res. 101, 333–349 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Moeseke P.: Stochastic linear programming: A study in resource allocation under risk. Yale Econ. Essays 5, 196–254 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Moeseke, P.: A general duality theorem of convex programming. Econometrica 39, 173–175 (1971); Moeseke

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Moeseke P., Hohenbalken B.V.: Efficient and optimal portfolios by homogeneous programming. Z. Oper. Res. 18, 205–214 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore G.A., Findlay M.C.: Stochastic Dominance: An Approach to Decision-Making Under Risk. D.C. Heath, Lexington (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu M., Wang S., Lai K.K., Chao X.: Multiperiod portfolio selection on a minimax rule. Dynam. Continuous Discret Impuls. Syst. Ser. B. 12, 565–587 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M., Inoue, H., Shi, J.: Portfolio selection with linear models in a financial market. Working paper, MS 06-04. Tokyo University of Science (2006)

  • Yu M., Takahashi S., Inoue H., Wang S.: Dynamic portfolio optimization with risk control for absolute deviation model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 201, 349–364 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X.Y., Li D.: Continuous time mean-variance portfolio selection: a stochastic LQ framework. Appl. Math. Optim. 42, 19–33 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S., Li D., Wang S.: Risk control over bankruptcy in dynamic portfolio selection: a generalized mean-variance formulation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49, 447–457 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, M., Wang, S. Dynamic optimal portfolio with maximum absolute deviation model. J Glob Optim 53, 363–380 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9887-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9887-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation