Skip to main content
Log in

Supply chain performance assessment and supplier and component importance identification in a general competitive multitiered supply chain network model

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a multitiered competitive supply chain network game theory model, which includes the supplier tier. The firms are differentiated by brands and can produce their own components, as reflected by their capacities, and/or obtain components from one or more suppliers, who also are capacitated. The firms compete in a Cournot–Nash fashion, whereas the suppliers compete a la Bertrand since firms are sensitive to prices. All decision-makers seek to maximize their profits with consumers reflecting their preferences through the demand price functions associated with the demand markets for the firms’ products. We construct supply chain network performance measures for the full supply chain and the individual firm levels that assess the efficiency of the supply chain or firm, respectively, and also allow for the identification and ranking of the importance of suppliers as well as the components of suppliers with respect to the full supply chain or individual firm. The framework is illustrated through a series of numerical supply chain network examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertrand, J.: Theorie mathematique de la richesse sociale. Journal des Savants, 67, 499–508 (1883)

  2. Bertsekas, D.P., Tsitsiklis, J.N.: Parallel and Distributed Computation—Numerical Methods. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Z., Teng, C., Zhang, D., Sun, J.: Modelling inter-supply chain competition with resource limitation and demand disruption. Int. J. Syst. Sci. (2014). doi:10.1080/00207721.2014.942499

  4. Chopra, S., Sodhi, M.S.: Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46(1), 53–61 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clendon, L., Bird, L.: 5th Annual Survey Supply Chain Resilience. Business Continuity Institute, Caversham, United Kingdom (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cournot, A.A.: Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, English translation. MacMillan, London, England (1838)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cruz, J.M.: Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184, 1005–1031 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruz, J.M.: The effects of network relationships on global supply chain vulnerability. In: Wu, T., Blackhurst, J. (eds.) Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability: Tools and Methods for Supply Chain Decision Makers, pp. 113–140. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cruz, J.M., Nagurney, A., Wakolbinger, T.: Financial engineering of the integration of global supply chain networks and social networks with risk management. Nav. Res. Logist. 53, 674–696 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dupuis, P., Nagurney, A.: Dynamical systems and variational inequalities. Ann. Oper. Res. 44, 9–42 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabay, D., Moulin, H.: On the uniqueness and stability of Nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In: Bensoussan, A., Kleindorfer, P., Tapiero, C.S. (eds.), Applied Stochastic Control in Econometrics and Management Science. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 271-294 (1980)

  12. Gupta, D.: The \((Q, r)\) inventory system with an unreliable supplier. INFOR 34, 59–76 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinderlehrer, D., Stampacchia, G.: An Introduction to Variational Inequalities and their Applications. Academic Press, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, D., Pierson, D.: Disaster in Japan exposes supply chain flaw. Los Angeles Times, (2011)

  15. Liu, Z., Cruz, J.M.: Supply chain networks with corporate financial risks and trade credits under economic uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 137, 55–67 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Z., Nagurney, A.: An integrated electric power supply chain and fuel market network framework: theoretical modeling with empirical analysis for New England. Nav. Res. Logist. 56, 600–624 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Z., Nagurney, A.: Supply chain networks with global outsourcing and quick-response production under demand and cost uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 208(1), 251–289 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mukherjee, A.S.: The Spider’s Strategy: Creating Networks to Avert Crisis, Create Change, and get Ahead. FT Press, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nagurney, A.: Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagurney, A.: Supply Chain Network Economics: Dynamics of Prices, Flows, and Profits. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nagurney, A.: Formulation and analysis of horizontal mergers among oligopolistic firms with insights into the merger paradox: a supply chain network perspective. Comput. Manag. Sci. 7, 377–410 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagurney, A., Cruz, J., Dong, J., Zhang, D.: Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26, 120–142 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagurney, A., Dhanda, K.K.: Marketable pollution permits in oligopolistic markets with transaction costs. Oper. Res. 48(3), 424–435 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagurney, A., Dong, J., Zhang, D.: A supply chain network equilibrium model. Transp. Res. E 38, 281–303 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagurney, A., Dupuis, P., Zhang, D.: A dynamical systems approach for network oligopolies and variational inequalities. Ann. Reg. Sci. 28, 263–283 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagurney, A., Li, D.: A supply chain network game theory model with product differentiation, outsourcing of production and distribution, and quality and price competition. Ann. Oper. Res. 228(1), 479–503 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagurney, A., Li, D., Nagurney, L.S.: Pharmaceutical supply chain networks with outsourcing under price and quality competition. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 20(6), 859–888 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagurney, A., Qiang, Q.: A network efficiency measure with application to critical infrastructure networks. J. Glob. Optim. 40, 261–275 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagurney, A., Qiang, Q.: Fragile Networks: Identifying Vulnerabilities and Synergies in an Uncertain World. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagurney, A., Zhang, D.: Projected Dynamical Systems and Variational Inequalities with Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Nash, J.F.: Noncooperative games. Ann. Math. 54, 286–298 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Parlar, M.: Continuous review inventory problem with random supply interruptions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 99, 366–385 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Parlar, M., Perry, D.: Inventory models of future supply uncertainty with single and multiple suppliers. Nav. Res. Logist. 43, 191–210 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., Luce, M.F.: When time is money: decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 66(2), 131–152 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qiang, Q.: The closed-loop supply chain network with competition and design for remanufactureability. J. Clean. Prod. 105, 346–356 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Qiang, Q., Ke, K., Anderson, T., Dong, J.: The closed-loop supply chain network with competition, distribution channel investment, and uncertainties. Omega 41(2), 186–194 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Qiang, Q., Nagurney, A.: A bi-criteria indicator to assess supply chain network performance for critical needs under capacity and demand disruptions. Transp. Res. A 46(5), 801–812 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Qiang, Q., Nagurney, A., Dong, J.: Modeling of supply chain risk under disruptions with performance measurement and robustness analysis. In: Wu, T., Blackhurst, J. (eds.) Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability: Tools and Methods for Supply Chain Decision Makers, pp. 91–111. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Sandoval-Chavez, D.A., Beruvides, M.G.: Using opportunity costs to determine the cost of quality: a case study in a continuous-process industry. Eng. Econ. 43, 107–124 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stevenson, A., Lindberg, C.A. (eds.): New Oxford American Dictionary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, England (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tang, C.S., Zimmerman, J.D., Nelson, J.I.: Managing new product development and supply chain risks: The Boeing 787 case. Supply Chain Forum 10(2), 74–86 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tomlin, B.T.: On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Manag. Sci. 52, 639–657 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Toyasaki, F., Daniele, P., Wakolbinger, T.: A variational inequality formulation of equilibrium models for end-of-life products with nonlinear constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 236, 340–350 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu, T., Blackhurst, J. (eds.): Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability: Tools and Methods for Supply Chain Decision Makers. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., Chidambaram, V.: The model for inbound supply risk analysis. Comput. Ind. 57, 350–365 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang, J.: Worst Thai floods in 50 years hit Apple, Toyota supply chain. Bloomberg (2011)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant CISE #1111276, for the NeTS: Large: Collaborative Research: Network Innovation Through Choice project awarded to the University of Massachusetts Amherst. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors acknowledge two anonymous reviewers and the Editor for their careful reading of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Nagurney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Nagurney, A. Supply chain performance assessment and supplier and component importance identification in a general competitive multitiered supply chain network model. J Glob Optim 67, 223–250 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-015-0371-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-015-0371-7

Keywords

Navigation