Skip to main content
Log in

A sparse chance constrained portfolio selection model with multiple constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a general sparse portfolio selection model with expectation, chance and cardinality constraints. For the sparse portfolio selection model, we derive respectively the sample based reformulation and distributionally robust reformulation with mixture distribution based ambiguity set. These reformulations are mixed-integer programming problem and programming problem with difference of convex functions (DC), respectively. As an application of the general model and its reformulations, we consider the sparse enhanced indexation problem with multiple constraints. Empirical tests are conducted on the real data sets from major international stock markets. The results demonstrate that the proposed model, the reformulations and the solution method can efficiently solve the enhanced indexation problem and our approach can generally achieve sparse tracking portfolios with good out-of-sample excess returns and high robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed, P., Nanda, S.: Performance of enhanced index and quantitative equity funds. Financ. Rev. 40, 459–479 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atta Mills, E.F.E., Yu, B., Gu, L.: On meeting capital requirements with a chance-constrained optimization model. SpringerPlus 5, 500 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2110-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brodie, J., Daubechies, I., Mol, C.D., Giannone, D., Loris, I.: Sparse and stable markowitz portfolios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 12267–12272 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Calafiore, G.C., El Ghaoui, L.: On distributionally robust chance-constrained linear programs. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 130, 1–22 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Canakgoz, N., Beasley, J.: Mixed-integer programming approaches for index tracking and enhanced indexation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196, 384–399 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chavez-Bedoyaa, L., Birge, J.R.: Index tracking and enhanced indexation using a parametric approach. J. Econ. Financ. Adm. Sci. 19, 19–44 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z., Peng, S., Liu, J.: Data-driven robust chance constrained problems: a mixture model approach. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 179, 1065–1085 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, Z., Wang, Y.: Two-sided coherent risk measures and their application in realistic portfolio optimization. J. Bank Financ. 32, 2667–2673 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, J., Delage, E., Lisser, A.: Distributionally robust stochastic knapsack problem. SIAM J. Optim. 24, 1485–1506 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Delage, E., Ye, Y.: Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58, 595–612 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Duffie, D., Pan, J.: An overview of value at risk. J. Deriv. 4, 7–49 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fastrich, B., Paterlini, S., Winker, P.: Cardinality versus q-norm constraints for index tracking. Quant. Financ. 14, 2019–2032 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernholz, R., Garvy, R., Hannon, J.: Diversity-weighted indexing. J. Portf. Manag. 24, 74–82 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao, J., Li, D.: Optimal cardinality constrained portfolio selection. Oper. Res. 61, 745–761 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanasusanto, G.A., Kuhn, D., Wallace, S.W., Zymler, S.: Distributionally robust multi-item newsvendor problems with multimodal demand distributions. Math. Program. 152, 1–32 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanasusanto, G.A., Roitch, V., Kuhn, D., Wiesemann, W.: Ambiguous joint chance constraints under mean and dispersion information. Oper. Res. 65, 751–767 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Henrion, R.: Structural properties of linear probabilistic constraints. Optimization 56, 425–440 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong, L.J., Yang, Y., Zhang, L.: Sequential convex approximations to joint chance constrained programs: a Monte Carlo approach. Oper. Res. 59, 617–630 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Jagannathan, R.: Chance-constrained programming with joint constraints. Oper. Res. 22, 358–372 (1974)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kataoka, S.: A stochastic programming model. Econometrica 31, 181–196 (1963)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Leitner, J.: Optimal portfolios with lower partial moment constraints and lpm-risk-optimal martingale measures. Math. Financ. 18, 317–331 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lejeune, M.A.: Game theoretical approach for reliable enhanced indexation. Decis. Anal. 9, 146–155 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lejeune, M.A., Samatlı-Paç, G.: Construction of risk-averse enhanced index funds. INFORMS J. Comput. 25, 701–719 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Ling, A., Sun, J., Yang, X.: Robust tracking error portfolio selection with worst-case downside risk measures. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 39, 178–207 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Luedtke, J., Ahmed, S.: A sample approximation approach for optimization with probabilistic constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 19, 674–699 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Luedtke, J., Ahmed, S., Nemhauser, G.L.: An integer programming approach for linear programs with probabilistic constraints. Math. Program. 122, 247–272 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Mezali, H., Beasley, J.E.: Quantile regression for index tracking and enhanced indexation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64, 1676–1692 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nemirovski, A., Shapiro, A.: Scenario approximations of chance constraints. In: Calafiore, G., Dabbene, F. (eds.) Probabilistic and Randomized Methods for Design under Uncertainty, pp. 3–47. Springer, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prékopa, A.: Logarithmic concave measures with application to stochastic programming. Acta Sci. Math. 32, 301–316 (1971)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Price, K., Price, B., Nantell, T.J.: Variance and lower partial moment measures of systematic risk: some analytical and empirical results. J. Financ. 37, 843–855 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pyle, D.H., Turnovsky, S.J.: Risk aversion in chance constrained portfolio selection. Manag. Sci. 18, 218–225 (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Roman, D., Mitra, G., Zverovich, V.: Enhanced indexation based on second-order stochastic dominance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228, 273–281 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Roy, A.D.: Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 20, 431–449 (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Ruszczyński, A.: Probabilistic programming with discrete distributions and precedence constrained knapsack polyhedra. Math. Program. 93, 195–215 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.P.: Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory, 2nd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Shefrin, H., Statman, M.: Behavioral portfolio theory. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 35, 127–151 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sion, M.: On general minimax theorems. Pac. J. Math. 8, 171–176 (1958)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun, Y., Aw, G., Loxtona, R., Teo, K.L.: Chance-constrained optimization for pension fund portfolios in the presence of default risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 256, 205–214 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Syam, S.S.: A dual ascent method for the portfolio selection problem with multiple constraints and linked proposals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 108, 196–207 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Telser, L.G.: Safety first and hedging. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23, 1–16 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Unser, M.: Lower partial moments as measures of perceived risk: an experimental study. J. Econ. Psychol. 21, 253–280 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xu, F., Lu, Z., Xu, Z.: An efficient optimization approach for a cardinality-constrained index tracking problem. Optim. Method Softw. 31, 258–271 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, F., Wang, M., Dai, Y.H., Xu, D.: A sparse enhanced indexation model with chance and cardinality constraints. J. Glob. Optim. 70, 5–25 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu, S., Fan, M., Li, D.: Portfolio management with robustness in both prediction and decision: a mixture model based learning approach. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 48, 1–25 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu, S., Fukushima, M.: Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Oper. Res. 57, 1155–1168 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, S., Li, D., Wang, S.: Robust portfolio selection under downside risk measures. Quant. Financ. 9, 869–885 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Zymler, S., Kuhn, D., Rustem, B.: Distributionally robust joint chance constraints with second-order moment information. Math. Program. 137, 167–198 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their heart-felt thanks to the handling editors and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful, constructive and detailed comments and suggestions, which have helped us to substantially improve the presentation and quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiping Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 11991023, 11991020 and 11735011).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Peng, S. & Lisser, A. A sparse chance constrained portfolio selection model with multiple constraints. J Glob Optim 77, 825–852 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-020-00901-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-020-00901-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation