Skip to main content
Log in

Weights Design For Maximal Order WENO Schemes

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) finite difference schemes, developed by Liu et al. (Comput Phys 115(1):200–212, 1994) and improved by Jiang and Shu (Comput Phys 126(1):202–228, 1996), are one of the most popular methods to approximate the solutions of hyperbolic equations. But these schemes fail to provide maximal order accuracy near smooth extrema, where the first derivative of the solution becomes zero. Some authors have addressed this problem with different weight designs. In this paper we focus on the weights proposed by Yamaleev and Carpenter (J Comput Phys 228:4248–4272, 2009). They propose new weights to provide faster weight convergence than those presented in Borges et al. (J Comput Phys 227:3191–3211, 2008) and deduce some constraints on the weights parameters to guarantee that the WENO scheme has maximal order for sufficiently smooth solutions with an arbitrary number of vanishing derivatives. We analyze the scheme with the weights proposed in Yamaleev and Carpenter (J Comput Phys 228:4248–4272, 2009) and prove that near discontinuities it achieves worse orders than classical WENO schemes. In order to solve these accuracy problems, we define new weights, based on those proposed in Yamaleev and Carpenter (J Comput Phys 228:4248–4272, 2009), and get some constraints on the weights parameters to guarantee maximal order accuracy for the resulting schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aràndiga, F., Baeza, A., Belda, A.M., Mulet, P.: Analysis of WENO schemes for full and global accuracy. SIAM J. Num. Anal. 42(2), 893–915 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borges, R., Carmona, M., Costa, B., Don, W.: An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 3191–3211 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Casper, J., Carpenter, M.H.: Computational considerations for the simulation of shock-induced sound. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19(3), 813–828 (1998). (electronic)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Donat, R., Marquina, A.: Capturing shock reflections: an improved flux formula. J. Comput. Phys. 125(1), 42–58 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Engquist, B., Sjögreen, B.: The convergence rate of finite difference schemes in the presence of shocks. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35(6), 2464–2485 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.: Uniformly high-order accurate essentially nonoscillatory schemes. III. J. Comput. Phys. 71(2), 231–303 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Henrick, A., Aslam, T., Powers, J.: Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: achieving optimal order near critical points. J. Comput. Phys. 207, 542–567 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, G.S., Shu, C.W.: Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126(1), 202–228 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, X.D., Osher, S., Chan, T.: Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115(1), 200–212 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulet, P.: The maximal order of semidiscrete schemes for quasilinear first order partial differential equations (2012). Submitted

  11. Shu, C.W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77(2), 439–471 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Shu, C.W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. II. J. Comput. Phys. 83(1), 32–78 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sod, G.: A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27(1), 1–31 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodward, P., Colella, P.: The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54(1), 115–173 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamaleev, N., Carpenter, M.: A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 4248–4272 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamaleev, N., Carpenter, M.: Third-order energy stable WENO scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 3025–3047 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Mulet.

Additional information

This research was partially supported by Spanish MINECO Grant MTM 2011–22741.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aràndiga, F., Martí, M.C. & Mulet, P. Weights Design For Maximal Order WENO Schemes. J Sci Comput 60, 641–659 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-013-9810-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-013-9810-0

Keywords

Navigation