Skip to main content
Log in

A Two-Stage Low Rank Approach for Calibrationless Dynamic Parallel Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parallel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging technique by acquiring a reduced amount of data in Fourier domain with multiple receiver coils. To recover the underlying imaging object, one often needs the explicit knowledge of coil sensitivity maps, or some additional fully acquired data blocks called the auto-calibration signals (ACS). In this paper, we show that by exploiting the between-frame redundancy of dynamic parallel MRI data, it is possible to achieve simultaneous coil sensitivity map estimation and image sequence reconstruction. Specially, we introduce a novel two-stage approach for dynamic parallel MRI reconstruction without pre-calibrating the coil sensitivity maps nor additionally acquiring any fully sampled ACS. Numerical experiments demonstrate that, the performance of the proposed approach is better than other state-of-the-art approaches for calibrationless dynamic parallel MRI reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data source - http://challenge.ismrm.org/node/53

  2. One might intuitively think that the the data frame with maximum number of samples in the auto-calibration region should be the best choice, but that is not true. For instance, in the second experiment of Sect. 5, the data frame with maximum number of samples in the auto-calibration region is frame 13, while exhaustive enumeration suggests frame 2 is the best choice, and the later one leads to significantly lower reconstruction error compared with the former one.

References

  1. Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2(1), 183–202 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai, J.-F., Candès, E.J., Shen, Z.: A singular value thresholding algorithm for matrix completion. SIAM J. Optim. 20(4), 1956–1982 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrasekaran, V., Sanghavi, S., Parrilo, P., Willsky, A.S., et al.: Sparse and low-rank matrix decompositions. In: 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, 2009. Allerton 2009, pp. 962–967. IEEE (2009)

  4. Combettes, P.L., Wajs, V.R.: Signal recovery by proximal forward–backward splitting. Multiscale Model.Simul. 4(4), 1168–1200 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Daubechies, I., Defrise, M., De Mol, C.: An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 57(11), 1413–1457 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, Q., Zan, Y., Huang, Q., Zhang, X.: Dynamic SPECT reconstruction from few projections: a sparsity enforced matrix factorization approach. Inverse Probl 31(2), 025004 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao, H., Lin, H., Ahn, C.B., Nalcioglu, O.: PRISM: A divide-and-conquer low-rank and sparse decomposition model for dynamic MRI. UCLA CAM Report (2011)

  8. Gao, H., Rapacchi, S., Wang, D., Moriarty, J., Meehan, C., Sayre, J., Laub, G., Finn, P., Hu, P.: Compressed sensing using prior rank, intensity and sparsity model (PRISM): applications in cardiac cine MRI. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 2242 (2012)

  9. Griswold, M.A., Jakob, P.M., Heidemann, R.M., Nittka, M., Jellus, V., Wang, J., Kiefer, B., Haase, A.: Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 47(6), 1202–1210 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, F., Akao, J., Vijayakumar, S., Duensing, G.R., Limkeman, M.: k–t GRAPPA: a k-space implementation for dynamic MRI with high reduction factor. Magn. Reson. Med. 54(5), 1172–1184 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreutz-Delgado, K.: The complex gradient operator and the cr-calculus. University of California, San Diego, version ucsd-ece275cg-s2009v1. 0, 25 june 2009. arXiv:0906.4835

  12. Liang, D., DiBella, E.V., Chen, R.-R., Ying, L.: k-t ISD: Dynamic cardiac MR imaging using compressed sensing with iterative support detection. Magn. Reson. Med. 68(1), 41–53 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang, D., Liu, B., Wang, J., Ying, L.: Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing. Magn. Reson. Med. 62(6), 1574–1584 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang, Z.-P.: Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions. In: Joint Meeting of the 6th International Symposium on Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart and the International Conference on Functional Biomedical Imaging, 2007. NFSI-ICFBI 2007, pp. 181–182. IEEE (2007)

  15. Lustig, M., Donoho, D., Pauly, J.M.: Sparse mri: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med 58(6), 1182–1195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lustig, M., Pauly, J.M.: SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn. Reson. Med. 64(2), 457–471 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Otazo, R., Candès, E., Sodickson, D.K.: Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components. Magn. Reson. Med. 73(3), 1125–1136 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pruessmann, K.P., Weiger, M., Scheidegger, M.B., Boesiger, P.: SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 952–962 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen, Z., Toh, K.-C., Yun, S.: An accelerated proximal gradient algorithm for frame-based image restoration via the balanced approach. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 4(2), 573–596 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin, P.J., Larson, P.E., Ohliger, M.A., Elad, M., Pauly, J.M., Vigneron, D.B., Lustig, M.: Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction based on structured low-rank matrix completion. Magn. Reson. Med. 72(4), 959–970 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sodickson, D.K., Manning, W.J.: Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 38(4), 591–603 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Uecker, M., Lai, P., Murphy, M.J., Virtue, P., Elad, M., Pauly, J.M., Vasanawala, S.S., Lustig, M.: ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn. Reson. Med. 71(3), 990–1001 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, J., Kluge, T., Nittka, M., Jellus, V., Kuhn, B., Kiefer, B.: Using reference lines to improve the SNR of mSENSE. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, p. 2392 (2002)

  24. Zhao, T., Hu, X.: Iterative GRAPPA (iGRAPPA) for improved parallel imaging reconstruction. Magn. Reson. Med. 59(4), 903–907 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would thank the authors of [17] and [16, 20, 22] for making their codes, demos and experimental datasets free for academic use.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoqun Zhang.

Additional information

Hao Gao was partially supported by the NSFC (#11405105), the 973 Program (#2015CB856004), and the Shanghai Pujiang Talent Program (#14PJ1404500). L. Hou and X. Zhang were partially supported by NSFC (#91330102) and Sino-German center grant (GZ1025), China Postdoc Science Foundation (# 2014M551392), and 973 Program (# 2015CB856004).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, L., Gao, H. & Zhang, X. A Two-Stage Low Rank Approach for Calibrationless Dynamic Parallel Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction. J Sci Comput 69, 1014–1032 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-016-0225-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-016-0225-6

Keywords

Navigation