Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a third order hierarchical basis WENO interpolation, which possesses similar accuracy and stability properties as usual WENO interpolations. The main motivation for the hierarchical approach is the direct applicability on sparse grids. This is for instance of large practical interest in the numerical solution of conservation laws with uncertain data, where discontinuities in the physical domain often carry over to the (potentially high-dimensional) stochastic domain. For this, we apply the introduced hierarchical basis WENO interpolation within a non-intrusive collocation method and present first results on 2- and 3-dimensional sparse grids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abgrall, R.: A simple, flexible and generic deterministic approach to uncertainty quantifications in non linear problems: application to fluid flow problems. INRIA Report, September 2008
Abgrall, R., Congedo, P., Corre, C., Galéra, S.: A simple semi-intrusive method for uncertainty quantification of shocked flows, comparison with a non-intrusive polynomial chaos method. In: Pereira, J., Sequira, A. (eds.) V European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (2010)
Abgrall, R., Congedo, P.M.: A semi-intrusive deterministic approach to uncertainty quantification in non-linear fluid flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 235(C), 828–845 (2013)
Aràndiga, F., Baeza, A., Belda, A.M., Mulet, P.: Analysis of WENO schemes for full and global accuracy. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49(2), 893–915 (2011)
Babuška, I., Nobile, F., Tempone, R.: A stochastic collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations with random input data. SIAM Rev. 52(2), 317–355 (2010)
Barth, T.: Non-intrusive uncertainty propagation with error bounds for conservation laws containing discontinuities. In: Bijl, H., Lucor, D., Mishra, S., Schwab, C. (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 92, pp. 1–57. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Bungartz, H.-J., Griebel, M.: Sparse grids. Acta Numer. 13(5), 147–269 (2004)
Cravero, I., Semplice, M.: On the accuracy of WENO and CWENO reconstructions of third order on nonuniform meshes. J. Sci. Comput. 67(3), 1219–1246 (2016)
Ghanem, R.G., Spanos, P.D.: Stochastic Finite Elements. Springer, Berlin (1991)
Gottlieb, D., Xiu, D.: Galerkin method for wave equations with uncertain coefficients. Commun. Comput. Phys. 3(2), 505–518 (2008)
Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.R.: Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes. III. J. Comput. Phys. 71, 231–303 (1987)
Heiss, F., Winschel, V.: Likelihood approximation by numerical integration on sparse grids. J. Econom. 144(1), 62–80 (2008)
Jiang, G.-S., Shu, C.-W.: Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126(1), 202–228 (1996)
Kolb, O.: On the full and global accuracy of a compact third order WENO scheme. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52(5), 2335–2355 (2014)
Kolb, O.: On the full and global accuracy of a compact third order WENO scheme: Part II. In: Karasözen, B., Manguoğlu, M., Tezer-Sezgin, M., Göktepe, S., Uğur, Ö. (eds.) Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2015, pp. 53–62. Springer, Berlin (2016)
Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., Chan, T.: Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115, 200–212 (1994)
Mishra, S., Schwab, C.: Sparse tensor multi-level Monte Carlo finite volume methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with random initial data. Math. Comput. 81(280), 1979–2018 (2012)
Mishra, S., Schwab, C., Šukys, J.: Multi-level Monte Carlo finite volume methods for nonlinear systems of conservation laws in multi-dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 231(8), 3365–3388 (2012)
Nobile, F., Tempone, R., Webster, C.G.: A sparse grid stochastic collocation method for partial differential equations with random input data. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46(5), 2309–2345 (2008)
Poëtte, G., Després, B., Lucor, D.: Uncertainty quantification for systems of conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 2443–2467 (2009)
Poëtte, G., Després, B., Lucor, D.: Adaptive hybrid spectral methods for stochastic systems of conservation laws. Preprint submitted to Elsevier (2010)
Sánchez-Linares, C., de la Asunción, M., Castro, M., Mishra, S., Šukys, J.: Multi-level Monte Carlo finite volume method for shallow water equations with uncertain parameters applied to landslides-generated tsunamis. Appl. Math. Model. 39(23–24), 7211–7226 (2015)
Sod, G.A.: A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27(1), 1–31 (1978)
Tokareva, S., Schwab, C., Mishra, S.: High order SFV and mixed SDG/FV methods for the uncertainty quantification in multidimensional conservation laws. In: Abgrall, R., Beaugendre, H., Congedo, P., Dobrzynski, C., Perrier, V., Ricchiuto, M. (eds.) High Order Nonlinear Numerical Schemes for Evolutionary PDEs, pp. 109–133. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2014)
Tryoen, J., Le Maître, O., Ndjinga, M., Ern, A.: Intrusive Galerkin methods with upwinding for uncertain nonlinear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 229(18), 6485–6511 (2010)
Wan, X., Karniadakis, G.E.: An adaptive multi-element generalized polynomial chaos method for stochastic differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 209, 617–642 (2005)
Wan, X., Karniadakis, G.E.: Multi-element generalized polynomial chaos for arbitrary probability measures. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28, 901–928 (2006)
Witteveen, J.A., Iaccarino, G.: Essentially non-oscillatory stencil selection and subcell resolution in uncertainty quantification. In: Bijl, H., Lucor, D., Mishra, S., Schwab, C. (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 92, pp. 295–333. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolb, O. A Third Order Hierarchical Basis WENO Interpolation for Sparse Grids with Application to Conservation Laws with Uncertain Data. J Sci Comput 74, 1480–1503 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-017-0503-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-017-0503-y