Skip to main content
Log in

One-Dimensional/Two-Dimensional Coupling Approach with Quadrilateral Confluence Region for Modeling River Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study shallow water flows in river systems. An accurate description of such flows can be obtained using the two-dimensional (2-D) shallow water equations, which can be numerically solved by a shock-capturing finite-volume method. This approach can, however, be inefficient and computationally unaffordable when a large river system with many tributaries and complex geometry is to be modeled. A popular simplified approach is to model flow in each uninterrupted section of the river (called a reach) as one-dimensional (1-D) and connect the reaches at the river junctions. The flow in every reach can then be modeled using the 1-D shallow water equations, whose numerical solution is dramatically less computationally expensive compared with solving its 2-D counterpart. Even though several point-junction models are available, most of them prove to be sufficiently accurate only in the case of a smooth flow though the junction. We propose a new 1-D/2-D river junction model, in which each reach of the river is modeled by the 1-D shallow water equations, while the confluence region, where the mixing of flows from the different directions occurs, is modeled by the 2-D ones. We define the confluence region to be a trapezoid with parallel vertical sides. This allows us to take into account both the average width of each reach and the angle between the directions of flow of the tributary and the principal river at the confluence. We choose a trapezoidal confluence region as it is consistent with the 1-D model of the river. We implement well-balanced positivity preserving second-order semi-discrete central-upwind schemes developed in Kurganov and Petrova (Commun Math Sci 5:133–160, 2007) for the 1-D shallow water equations and in Shirkhani et al. (Comput Fluids 126: 25–40, 2016) for the 2-D shallow water equations using quadrilateral grids. For the 2-D junction simulations in the confluence region we choose a very coarse 2-D mesh as the goal of our model is not to resolve the fine details of complex 2-D vortices that form around the junction, but to efficiently compute average water depth and velocity in the connected 1-D reaches. A special ghost cell technique is developed for coupling the reaches to the confluence region, which is one of the most important parts of a good 1-D/2-D coupling method. The proposed approach leads to very significant computational savings compared to numerically solving the full 2-D problem. We perform several numerical experiments to demonstrate plausibility of the proposed 1-D/2-D coupling model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barkau, R.L.: UNET: one-dimensional unsteady flow through a full network of open channels. User’s manual, tech. rep., US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis CA, Version 4.0 (2001)

  2. Beljadid, A., Mohammadian, A., Kurganov, A.: Well-balanced positivity preserving cell-vertex central-upwind scheme for shallow water flows. Comput. Fluids 136, 193–206 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellamoli, F., Müller, L.O., Toro, E.F.: A numerical method for junctions in networks of shallow-water channels. Appl. Math. Comput. 337, 190–213 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleninger, T., Fenton, J.D., Zentgraf, R.: One-dimensional flow modelling and a case study of the River Rhine. In: River Flow 2006, Proceedings of International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, pp. 1963–1972 (2006)

  5. Brunner, G.: HEC-RAS: River analysis system, hydraulic reference manual, tech. rep., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis CA, 2010. Version 4.1

  6. Bryson, S., Epshteyn, Y., Kurganov, A., Petrova, G.: Well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme on triangular grids for the Saint-Venant system. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 45, 423–446 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunge, J.A., Holly, F.M., Verwey, A.: Practical Aspects of Computational River Hydraulics. Pitman, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Saint-Venant, A.J.C.: Thèorie du mouvement non-permanent des eaux, avec application aux crues des rivière at à l’introduction des marèes dans leur lit. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 73, 147–154 (1871). 237–240

  9. Formaggia, L., Nobile, F., Quarteroni, A., Veneziani, A.: Multiscale modelling of the circulatory system: a preliminary analysis. Comput. Vis. Sci. 2, 75–83 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fread, D.L.: Technique for implicit dynamic routing in rivers with tributaries. Water Resour. Res. 9, 918–926 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Godlewski, E., Raviart, P.-A.: Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws, vol. 118. Springer, New York (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Gottlieb, S., Ketcheson, D., Shu, C.-W.: Strong Stability Preserving Runge–Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Gottlieb, S., Shu, C.-W., Tadmor, E.: Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43, 89–112 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Gouta, N., Maurel, F.: A finite volume solver for 1D shallow-water equations applied to an actual river. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 38, 1–19 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goutal, N., Lacombe, J.M., Zaoui, F., El-Kadi-Abderrezzak, K.: MASCARET: a 1-D Open-source Software for Flow Hydrodynamic and Water Quality in Open Channel Networks, in River Flow, vol. 1, pp. 1169–1174. Taylor & Francis, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kröner, D.: Numerical Schemes for Conservation Laws, Wiley-Teubner Series Advances in Numerical Mathematics. Wiley, Chichester (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurganov, A., Levy, D.: Central-upwind schemes for the Saint-Venant system. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 36, 397–425 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurganov, A., Noelle, S., Petrova, G.: Semidiscrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 707–740 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurganov, A., Petrova, G.: A second-order well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme for the Saint-Venant system. Commun. Math. Sci. 5, 133–160 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurganov, A., Prugger, M., Wu, T.: Second-order fully discrete central-upwind scheme for two-dimensional hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 39, A947–A965 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurganov, A., Qu, Z., Rozanova, O., Wu, T.: Adaptive moving mesh central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic system of PDEs. Applications to compressible Euler equations and granular hydrodynamics. Preprint

  22. Kurganov, A., Qu, Z., Wu, T.: Well-balanced positivity preserving adaptive moving mesh central-upwind schemes for the Saint-Venant systems of shallow water equations. In preparation

  23. LeVeque, R.: Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

  24. Liu, F., Hodges, B.R.: Dynamic river network simulation at large scale. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Design Automation Conference, ACM, pp. 723–728 (2012)

  25. Liu, F., Hodges, B.R.: Applying microprocessor analysis methods to river network modelling. Environ. Model. Softw. 52, 234–252 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, X., Albright, J., Epshteyn, Y., Kurganov, A.: Well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme with a novel wet/dry reconstruction on triangular grids for the Saint-Venant system. J. Comput. Phys. 374, 213–236 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Miglio, E., Perotto, S., Saleri, F.: Model coupling techniques for free-surface flow problems: part I. Nonlinear Anal. 63, e1885–e1896 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. MIKE11, A modelling system for rivers and channels, reference manual, tech. rep., DHI: Hørsholm, Denmark, http://manuals.mikepoweredbydhi.help/2017/Water_Resources/Mike_11_ref.pdf (2017)

  29. Nessyahu, H., Tadmor, E.: Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87, 408–463 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Novak, P., Guinot, V., Jeffrey, A., Reeve, D.E.: Hydraulic Modelling: An Introduction. Spon Prees, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Quarteroni, A., Formaggia, L.: Mathematical modelling and numerical simulation of the cardiovascular system. In: Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. 12, Elsevier, pp. 3–127 (2004)

  32. Rohan, R., Masson, A., Arlet, C, Rebaï, A., Jost, C., Chaléon, C.: Development of a modelling tool of the Seine River and its main tributaries. In: Advances in Hydroinformatics, Springer, Berlin, pp. 659–673 (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Shirkhani, H., Mohammadian, A., Seidou, O., Kurganov, A.: A well-balanced positivity-preserving central-upwind scheme for shallow water equations on unstructured quadrilateral grids. Comput. Fluids 126, 25–40 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Steinebach, G., Rademacher, S., Rentrop, P., Schulz, M.: Mechanisms of coupling in river flow simulation systems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 168, 459–470 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Stoker, J.J.: Water Waves: The Mathematical Theory with Applications, vol. 36. Wiley, London (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Sweby, P.K.: High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21, 995–1011 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101–136 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu, W., Vieira, D.A.: One-dimensional channel network model CCHE1D version 3.0: technical manual, Tech. Rep. NCCH-TR-2002-02, National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering (2002)

  39. Yeh, G.T., Huang, G.B., Zhang, F., Cheng, H.P., Lin, H.C.: WASH123D: A numerical model of flow, thermal transport, and salinity, sediment, and water quality transport in WAterSHed systems of 1-D stream-river network, 2-D overland regime, and 3-D subsurface media, tech. rep., EPA. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL (2006)

  40. Zhang, M., Xu, Y., Hao, Z., Qiao, Y.: Integrating 1D and 2D hydrodynamic, sediment transport model for dam-break flow using finite volume method. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 774–783 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of A. Chertock was supported in part by NSF Grants DMS-1521051 and DMS-1818684. The work of A. Kurganov was supported in part by NSFC Grant 11771201 and NSF Grants DMS-1521009 and DMS-1818666.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Chertock.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Chertock, A., Kurganov, A. et al. One-Dimensional/Two-Dimensional Coupling Approach with Quadrilateral Confluence Region for Modeling River Systems. J Sci Comput 81, 1297–1328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-019-00985-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-019-00985-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation