Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Analysis of Medical Web Search Using Generalized vs. Niche Technologies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One increasingly popular solution to the problem of information overload is the niche search engine, designed as a customized knowledge management tool to meet the needs of information seekers with similar interests. By limiting web crawling to a specific subject area, the niche engine is able to crawl deeper and more discreetly than commercial counterparts. This exploratory technology assessment study sought to examine differences in information search and retrieval patterns between commercial and niche search engines in areas of debated or uncertain healthcarer treatment. Findings suggest that while information found within the niche search is generally more trustworthy, niche searches leave out many reliable sources which are retrievable through commercial search engines. Also, consumer-friendly (non-technical) resources were found to be more prevalent using commercial search engines, suggesting greater relevance for the layperson within this domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Network Wizards. Internet Domain Survey. Available www.nw.com. Last accessed on December 28, 2004.

  2. Internet is Bulging with Health Sites. Asheville Citizen-Times: February 3, 1997, p. C2.

  3. Brown, M., Consumer health and medical information on the internet: Supply and demand. Available at: http://etrg.findsvp.com/health/mktginfo.html. Last accessed on December 22, 2004

  4. Fox, S., and Rainie, L., The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report, 2002.

  5. Lorence, D., Technology Assessment Within Domains of Uncertainty, VMI Press, Gettysburg, PA: in press.

  6. General Accounting Office. Consumer Health Informatics—Emerging Issues, Author, Washington, DC, 1996.

  7. Jitaru, E., Moisil, I., and Jitaru, M. C., Criteria for evaluating the quality of health related sites on Internet. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Econ. Inform., p. 1190, 2001.

  8. Jadad, A., and Gagliardi, A., Rating health information on the Internet: Navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 279(8):611–614, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Federal Trade Commission. Operation Cure.all Targets Internet Health Fraud. Press Release, June 24, 1999. FTC Office of Public Affairs, Washington, DC.

  10. Beales, H., Hearing on swindlers, hucksters and snake oil salesmen: The hype and hope of marketing anti-aging products to seniors. Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission, United States Senate Special Committee on Aging, September 10, 2001.

  11. Osheroff, J. A., Forsythe, D. E., Buchanan, B. G., Bankowitz, R. A., Blumenfeld, B. H., and Miller, R. A., Physicians’ information needs: Analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann. Intern. Med. 114(7):576–581, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pew Internet and American life. Internet health resources: Health searches and email have become more commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall internet access. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report, 2003.

  13. Glowniak, J. V., Medical resources on the internet. Ann. Intern. Med. 123(2):123–131, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldwein, J. W., and Benjamin, I., Internet-based medical information: Time to take charge. Ann. Intern. Med. 123(2):152–153, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cline, R. W., and Haynes, K. M., Consumer health information seeking on the internet: The state of the art. Health Educ. Res. 16(6):671–692, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Culver, J. D., Gerr, F., and Frumkin, H., Medical information on the internet a study of an electronic bulletin board. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 12(8):466–470, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kassirer, J. P., Patients, physicians, and the internet. Health Aff. 19(6):115–123, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schloman, B. F., Information resources column: Quality of health information on the web: Where are we now? Online J. Issues Nurs., 8(1), 2002. Available at http://nursingworld.org/ojin/infocol/info_10.htm.

  19. Ademiluyi, G., Rees, C. E., and Sheard, C. E., Quality of smoking cessation information on the Internet: A cross-sectional survey study. J. Documentation 58(6):60–67, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brann, M., and Anderson, J. G., E-medicine and health care consumers: Recognizing current problems and possible resolutions for a safer environment. Health Care Anal. 10(4):403–415, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fox, S., and Rainie, L., Vital Decisions: How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report, 2002.

  22. Crocco, A. G., Villasis-Keever, M., and Jadad, A. R., Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 287(21):2869–2871, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kunst, H., Groot, D., Latthe, P. M., Latthe, M., and Khan, K. S., Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: Survey of five common health topics. BMJ 324(7337):581–582, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenberg, L., D’Andrea, G., and Lorence, D., Setting the public agenda for online health search: A white paper and action agenda. J. Med. Internet Res. 6(2):e18, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lorence, D., Technology Assessment Within Domains of Uncertainty, VMI Press, Gettysburg, PA: in press.

  26. Sanders, T., and Skevington, S., Participation as an expression of patient uncertainty: An exploration of bowel cancer consultations. Psychooncology 13(10):675, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fox, S., and Rainie, L., The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report, 2002.

  28. Misdiagnosis center. Available at: www.wrongdiagnosis.com/b/back_pain/stats.htm. Last accessed on December 28, 2004.

  29. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. From Cells to Selves. Targeting Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS): A Strategic Plan. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lawrence, R. C., Helmick, C. G., Arnett, F. C., Deyo, R. A., Felson, D. T., Giannini, E. H., Heyse, S. P., Hirsch, R., Hochberg, M. C., Hunder, G. G., Liang, M. H., Pillemer, S. R., Steen, V. D., and Wolfe, F., Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 41(5):778–799, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Szabo, R. M., and King, K. J., Repetitive stress injury: Diagnosis or self-fulfilling prophecy? J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 82(9):1314–1322, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Misdiagnosis Center. Available at: www.wrongdiagnosis.com/b/back_pain/stats.htm. Last accessed on December 28, 2004.

  33. Manek, N. J., and Macgregor, A. J., Epidemiology of back disorders: Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 17(2):134–140, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jansen, B. J., and Spink, A., An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed. The 4th Int. Conf. Internet Comput., Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 65–69, June, 2003.

  35. Silberg, W. M., Lundberg, G. D., and Musacchio, R. A., Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor-let the reader and viewer beware. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 277(15):1244–1245, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. National Cancer Institute. Cancer facts: How to evaluate health information on the internet: Questions and answers. Available at: http://cancer.gov/. Last accessed on January 28, 2005.

  37. The Health on the Net Foundation. HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. Available at: www.hon.ch/HONcode. Last accessed on January 27, 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Policy and Administration and The School of Information Science and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, 114 Henderson HHD, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802

    Daniel Lorence & Joanna Abraham

Authors
  1. Daniel Lorence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanna Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Lorence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorence, D., Abraham, J. Comparative Analysis of Medical Web Search Using Generalized vs. Niche Technologies. J Med Syst 30, 211–219 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-7990-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-7990-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation