Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Context Based Error Modeling for Lossless Compression of EEG Signals Using Neural Networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-stage lossless data compression methods involving predictors and encoders are well known. This paper discusses the application of context based error modeling techniques for neural network predictors used for the compression of EEG signals. Error modeling improves the performance of a compression algorithm by removing the statistical redundancy that exists among the error signals after the prediction stage. In this paper experiments are carried out by using human EEG signals recorded under various physiological conditions to evaluate the effect of context based error modeling in the EEG compression. It is found that the compression efficiency of the neural network based predictive techniques is significantly improved by using the error modeling schemes. It is shown that the bits per sample required for EEG compression with error modeling and entropy coding lie in the range of 2.92 to 6.62 which indicates a saving of 0.3 to 0.7 bits compared to the compression scheme without error modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antoniol, G., and Tonella, P., EEG data compression techniques. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44(2):105–114, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Magotra, N., Mandyam, G., Sun, M., and McCoy, J. W., Lossless compression of electroencephalographic data, ISCAS 96. Proc. IEEE 2:313–315, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sriraam, N., Kannan, R., and Eswaran, C., Lossless compression of EEG data using neural network predictors, ICONNIP 2002. Proc. IEEE 4:2046–2048, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sriraam, N., and Eswaran, C., Performance analysis of perceptron predictors for EEG signal compression, IEEE TENCON 2003. Proc. IEEE 4:1600–1603, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sriraam, N., and Eswaran, C., EEG signal compression using optimally configured neural network predictors. IEE/IEEE Int. Conf. Med. Signal Inf. Process. 378–382, 2004.

  6. Sriraam, N., and Eswaran, C., Performance evaluation of two-stage lossless compression of EEG signals. Int. J. Signal Process. 1(2):89–92, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, X., Efficient and effective lossless compression of continuous-tone images via context selection and quantization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6:656–664, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, X., and Memon, N. D., Context-based adaptive lossless image coding. IEEE Trans. Commun. 45(4):437–444, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, X., Lossless compression of continuous-tone images via context selection, quantization, and modeling. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6(5):656–664, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Memon, N. N., Kong, X., Cinkler, J., Context-based lossless and near-lossless compression of EEG signals. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 3(3):231–238, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kong, X., Goel, V., and Thakor, N., Quantification of injury-related EEG signal changes using Itakura distance measure. Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 2947–2950, 1995.

  12. Dony, D., and Haykin, S., Neural network approaches to image compression. Proc. IEEE 83(2):288–303, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Howard, P., and Vitter, J. S., Error modeling for hierarchical lossless image compression. Data Compression Conf. Proc. IEEE 269–278, 1992.

  14. Biopac Owners Guide, 2001.

  15. Andrzejak, R. G., Lehnertz, K., Mormann, F., Rieke, F. C., David, P., and Elger, C. E., Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite-dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity: Dependence on recording region and brain state. Phys. Rev. E 64:1–8, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krkic, M., Roberts, S. J., Rezek, I. A., and Jordan, C., EEG based assessment of anesthetic-depth using neural network. Proc. Inst. Elect Eng. AI Methods Biosignal Anal. 10:991–996, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gersho, A., and Gray, R. M., Vector Quantization and Signal Compression. Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Logeswaran, R., and Eswaran, C., Neural network based lossless coding schemes for telemetry data. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Geosci. Remote Sensing 4:2057–2059, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work has been partly funded by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (MOSTE), Malaysia (IRPA Project number: 04-99-01-0052-EA04815).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Sriraam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sriraam, N., Eswaran, C. Context Based Error Modeling for Lossless Compression of EEG Signals Using Neural Networks. J Med Syst 30, 439–448 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-006-9025-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-006-9025-0

Keywords

Navigation