Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Antenatal Care Services on Birthweight: Importance of Model Specification and Empirical Procedure Used in Estimating the Marginal Productivity of Health Inputs

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to examine the effects of antenatal care (ANC) utilization on birthweight. The analysis is based on the data collected from ever-married women by Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 1998 (TDHS). Cost-effectiveness based health sector reform requires careful estimation of costs and productivity of health interventions as well as the substitution possibility among health inputs. If the parameters of production function are known, policy makers can estimate the health outcome effects of various input-mix. Two-stage least squares (TSLS) and ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation procedures are used in this paper to estimate the effect of health care input, namely antenatal care visits, on birthweight. Since the utilization of medical care itself may be dependent on women's expectation about the pregnancy outcome, the parameters estimated through OLS may underestimate the true productivity of the input. The estimated functions indicate that antenatal care, woman's health status, and birth order are significant determinants in birthweight. The TSLS estimate of marginal productivity of ANC visits was about four times the marginal productivity estimate in the OLS model. The sensitivity of the parameter estimates to model specifications and empirical procedures followed demonstrates the importance of selecting the right model from both theoretical and empirical point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hakkinen, U., The production of health and the demand for health care in Finland. Soc. Sci. Med. 33(3):225–237, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldstein, P. J., Health Care Economics, 4th Edn., Delmar Publishers Inc., Irvine, California, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Over, M., The Health Sector in a Developing Country. Economics for Health Sector Analysis: Concepts and Cases, World Bank, pp. 5–25, 1991.

  4. Rosenzweig, M. R., and Schultz, T. P., Consumer demand and household production: The relationship between fertility and child mortality. Am. Econ. Rev. 73:38–42, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joyce, T., The impact of induced abortion on black and white birth outcomes in the United States. Demography 24(2):229–244, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ministry of Health, Health Statistics, Ankara, 1997b.

  7. State Institute of Statistics, Turkey in Statistics 1998. Publication Number: 2191, Ankara, 1999

  8. Corman, H., Joyce, T. J., and Grossman, M., Birth outcome production function in the United States. J. Hum. Resour. XXII(3):339–360, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joyce, T., Self selection, prenatal care, and birth weight among blacks, whites, and hispanics in New York City. J. Hum. Resour. 29(3):762–794, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Panis, C. W. A., and Lillard, L. A., Health inputs and child mortality: Malaysia. J. Health Econ. 13:455–589, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenzweig, M. R., and Schultz, T. P., Estimating a household production function: Heterogeneity, The demand for health inputs, and their effects on birth weight. J. Pol. Econ. 91(5):723–747, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cebu Study Team, A child health production function estimated from longitudinal data. J. Dev. Econ. 38:323–351, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. UNICEF, Guidelines for Monitoring the Availability and Use of Obstetrics Services, UNFPA, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bollen, K. A., Guilkey, D. K., and Mroz, T. A., Binary outcomes and endogenous explanatory variables: Tests and solutions with an application to the demand for contraceptive use in Tunisia. Demography 32(1):111–131, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grossman, M., and Joyce, T., Unobservables, pregnancy resolutions, and birth weight production functions in New York City. J. Pol. Econ. 98(5):983–1007, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grossman, M., On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J. Pol. Econ. 80:223–255, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  17. World Bank, World Development Report 1993: Investing Health, pp. 1–36, 1993.

  18. Abel-Smith, B., An Introduction to Health Policy, Planning and Financing, Longman Group Limited, New York, pp. 106–120, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ministry of Health, Health Sector Reforms in Turkey, Ankara, 1997a.

  20. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Turkiye Nufus ve Saglik Arastirmasi 1998 (Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 1998), Macro International Inc., Ankara, Turkey, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tuncbilek, E., Infant Mortality in Turkey: Basic Factors. Semih Ofset Matbaacilik, Ankara, 1988.

  22. Celik, Y., The socio-economic determinants of alternative sources of antenatal care in Turkey. Int. J. Health Plann. Mgmt. 15:221–235, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Celik, Y., and Hotchkiss, D. R., The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Turkey. Soc. Sci. Med. 50(12):1797–1806, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Z. Younis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Celik, Y., Younis, M.Z. Effects of Antenatal Care Services on Birthweight: Importance of Model Specification and Empirical Procedure Used in Estimating the Marginal Productivity of Health Inputs. J Med Syst 31, 197–204 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9055-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9055-2

Keywords

Navigation