Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is the Availability of Hospital IT Applications Associated with a Hospital’s Risk Adjusted Incidence Rate for Patient Safety Indicators: Results from 66 Georgia Hospitals

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the associations between the availability of IT applications in a hospital and that hospital’s risk adjusted incidence rate per 1,000 hospitalizations for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) 15 Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs). The study population consists of a convenience sample of 66 community hospitals in Georgia that completed a Hospital IT survey by December 2003 and provided data to Georgia Hospital Discharge Data Set during 2004. AHRQ’s PSI software was used to estimate risk adjusted incidence rates. Differences in means, Pearson correlation coefficients, and multivariate regression analysis were used to determine if the availability of IT applications were associated with better PSI outcomes. This study finds very little statistically significant correlation between the availability of IT applications and risk adjusted PSI incident rate per 1,000 hospitalizations. In the multivariate regression models, the overall availability of IT applications in a hospital was significantly and negatively associated with the risk adjusted incident rate for only postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma. The count of functional applications available was negatively associated with postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma and foreign body left during procedure, while the count of technological devices was only associated with postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma. This study finds that the overall number of functional applications and technological devices available in a hospital is not associated with improved risk adjusted PSI outcomes. Future research is needed to examine if specific IT applications in specific clinical areas of the hospital are associated with improved PSI outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine, To Err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy of Sciences: National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patient safety indicators, version 2.1, revision, 3a. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, 2005. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/psi-download.htm.

  3. Remus, D., and Fraser, I., Guidance for using the AHRQ quality indicators for hospital-level public reporting or payment. US Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, 2004.

  4. Gaba, D., Structural and organizational issues in patient safety: A comparison of health care to other high-hazard industries. Calif. Manag. Rev. 43(1):83–102, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birkmeyer, J., Birkmeyer, C., Wennberg, D., and Young, M., Leapfrog safety standards: potential benefits of universal adoption. The Leapfrog Group: Washington, DC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Massachusetts Technology Collaborative in partnership with New England Healthcare Institute. Advanced technologies to lower health care cost and improve quality. Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation, 2003.

  7. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century: National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bates, D., Cohen, M., Leape, L., Overhage, J., Shabot, M., Sheridan, T., Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8:299–308, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston, D., Pan, E., Walker, J., Bates, D. W., and Middleton, B., The value of computerized provider order entry in ambulatory settings: book & cd. Center for IT Leadership, 2003. http://www.citl.org.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bates, D., and Gawande, A., Patient safety: Improving safety with information technology. New Engl. J. Med. 348(25):2526–2534, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Potts, A., Barr, F., Gregory, D., Wright, L., Patel, N., Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit. Pediatrics 113(1):59–60, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oren, E., Shaffer, E., and Guglielmo, B., Impact of emerging technologies on medication errors and adverse drug events. Am. J. Health-Sys. Pharm. 60(14):1447–1458, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pare’, G., and Sicotte, C., Information technology sophistication in health care: An instrument validation study among Canadian hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics 63(3):205–233, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Culler, S. D., Atherly, A., Walczak, S., Davis, A., Hawley, J., Rask, K., Naylor, V., and Thorpe, K., A comparison of urban and rural differences in the availability of hospital IT applications: Results from a survey of Georgia hospitals. J. Rural Health 22(3):242–247, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Health grades quality study patient safety in American hospitals. Health Grades, Inc., 2004. http://www.healthgrades.com.

  16. Health grades second annual patient safety in American hospital report. Health Grades, Inc, 2005. http://www.healthgrades.com.

  17. Burke, D., Wang, B., Wang, T., and Diana, M., Exploring hospitals’ adoption of information technology. J. Med. Syst. 26(4):349–355, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brook, R., Menachemi, N., Burke, D., and Clawson, A., Patient safety-related information technology utilization in urban and rural hospitals. J. Med. Syst. 29(2):103–109, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Menachemi, N., Burke, D., Clawson, A., and Brook, R., Information technologies in Florida’s rural hospitals: Does system affiliation matter? J. Rural Health 21(3):263–268, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nebeker, J. R., Hoffman, J. M., Weir, C. R., Bennett, C. L., and Hurdle, J. F., High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. Arch. Intern. Med. 165:1111–1116, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shulman, R., Singer, M., Goldstone, J., and Bellingan, G., Medication errors: A prospective cohort study of hand-written and computerized physician order entry in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care 9:R516–R521, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Quan, H., Parson, G. A., and Ghali, W. A., Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD-9-CM administrative data. Med. Care 40:675–685, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Romano, P. S., Chan, B. K., Schembri, M. E., and Rainwater, G. A., Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals? Med. Care 40:856–867, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by Grant Number 290-00-0011 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Steven D. Culler & Kimberly J. Rask

  2. Emory Center on Health Outcomes and Quality, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Jonathan N. Hawley & Kimberly J. Rask

  3. Georgia Hospital Association, Marietta, GA, USA

    Vi Naylor

  4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Steven D. Culler

Authors
  1. Steven D. Culler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan N. Hawley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vi Naylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kimberly J. Rask
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Culler.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 List of the 97 possible IT applications by major domains for both functional activities and technological devices
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Culler, S.D., Hawley, J.N., Naylor, V. et al. Is the Availability of Hospital IT Applications Associated with a Hospital’s Risk Adjusted Incidence Rate for Patient Safety Indicators: Results from 66 Georgia Hospitals. J Med Syst 31, 319–327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9071-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9071-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation