Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Hospital EMR Adoption: A National Study

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent focus on health care quality improvement and cost containment has led some policymakers and practitioners to advocate the adoption of health information technology. One such technology is the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), which is predicted to change and improve health care in the USA. Little is known about factors that influence hospital adoption of this relatively new technology. The purpose of this paper is to determine the national prevalence of EMR adoption in acute care hospitals while examining the organizational and environmental correlates using a Resource Dependence Theoretical Perspective. Significant predictors of hospital EMR use may indicate barriers to use for some hospitals and can be used to guide policy. This study uses a non-experimental cross sectional design to examine hospital EMR use in 2004. A logistic regression approach is used to determine the correlations between hospital EMR use and organizational and environmental characteristics. Hospital EMR use was identified using the HIMSS Analytics data. Organizational and environmental variables were measured using data from the AHA, CMS (financial and case mix) and ARF. Hospital EMR adoption is significantly associated with environmental uncertainty, type of system affiliation, size, and urban-ness. The effects of competition, munificence, ownership, teaching status, public payer mix, and operating margin were not statistically significant. Significant predictors of hospital EMR adoption represent barriers that may prevent certain hospitals from obtaining and using EMRs. These hospitals include those that are smaller, more rural, non-system affiliated, and in areas of low environmental uncertainty. Since EMR adoption may be an organizational survival strategy for hospitals to improve quality and efficiency, hospitals that are at risk of missing the wave of implementation should be offered services and incentives to enable them to implement and maintain EMR systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Farsi, M., and West, D., Use of electronic medical records in Oman and Physician satisfaction. J. Med. Syst. 30(1):17–22, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Hospital Association., Continued Progress Hospital Use of Informational Technology. American Hospital Association: Washington, DC, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ash, J., and Bates, D., Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report on a 2004 ACMI discussion. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12:8–12, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balotsky, E., Is it resources, habit, or both: Interpreting twenty years of hospital strategic response to prospective payment. Health Care Manage. Rev. 30(4):337–346, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baron, R., Fabens, E., Schiffman, M., and Wolf, E., Electronic health records: Just around the corner? Or over the cliff? Ann. Intern. Med. 143(3):222–226, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bates, D., Ebell, M., Gotlieb, E., Zapp, F., and Mullins, H., A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(1):1–10, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bazzoli, G., Shortell, S., Dubbs, N., Chan, C., and Kravolec, P., A taxonomy of health networks and systems: Bringing order out of chaos. Health Serv. Res. 33(6):1683–1717, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berner, E., Detmer, D., and Simborg, D., Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(1):3–7, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burgess, J., Carey, K., and Young, G., The effect of network arrangements on hospital pricing behavior. J. Health Econ. 24(2):391–405, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burt, C., and Hing, E., Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001–03. Advance Data. (353):1–8, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control Website. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nehis/tab18.pdf Retrieved In November 2005.

  12. Clement, J., and Grazier, K., HMO penetration: Has it hurt public hospitals? J. Health Care Finance. 28(1):25–38, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cutler, D., Feldman, N., and Horwitz, J., U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry system. Health Aff. 24(6):1654–1663, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Demiris, G., Patrick, T., and Boren, S., Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one U.S. state. Informatics in Primary Care. 12(3):157–162, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fonkych, K., and Taylor, R., The state and pattern of health information technology. RAND Corporation: California, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ginn, G., and Young, G., Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital strategy. Hosp. Health Serv. Adm. 37(3):291–302, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ginn, G., Young, G., and Beekum, R., Business strategy and financial structure: An empirical analysis of acute care hospitals. Hosp. Health Serv. Adm. 40(2):191–209, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hannan, T., Variation in health care—The roles of the electronic medical record. Int. J. Med. Informatics. 54(2):127–136, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatch, M.J., Organizational theory modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1997.

  20. Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., Bower, A., Girosi, F., Meili, R., Scoville, R., and Taylor, R., Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff. 24(5):1103–1117, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jha, A., Ferris, T., Donelan, K., DesRoches, C., Shields, A., Rosenbaum, S., and Blumenthal, D., How common are electronic health records in the United States? a summary of the evidence. Health Affairs Web Exclusive, 2006.

  22. Lee, S., and Alexander, J., Managing hospitals in turbulent times: Do organizational changes improve hospital survival? Health Serv. Res. 34(4):923–946, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lejbkowicz, I., Denekamp, Y., Reis, S., and Goldenberg, D., Electronic medical records systems in Israel’s public hospitals. The Israel Medical Association Journal. 6(10):583–587, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lucas, J., Avi-Itshak, T., Robinson, J., Morris, C., Koren, M., and Reinhard, S., Continuous quality Improvement as an innovation: Which nursing facilities adopt it? Gerontologist. 45(1):68–77, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, R., and Sim, I., Physicians’ Use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Aff. 23(2):116–126, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Neill, L., and Klepack, W., Electronic medical Records for a rural family practice: A case Study in systems development. J. Med. Syst. 31:25–33, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pestotnik, S., Classen, D., Evans, R., and Burke, J., Implementing antibiotic practice guidelines through computer-assisted decision support. Ann. Intern. Med. 124(10):884–890, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Poon, E., Jha, A., Christino, M., Honour, M., Fernandopulle, R., Middleton, B., Newhouse, J., Leape, L., Bates, D., Blumenthal, D., and Kaushal, R., Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: A snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decision Making. 6(1), 2006.

  29. Proenca, E., Rosko, M., and Zinn, J., Correlates of hospital provision of prevention and health promotion services. Med. Care Res. Rev. 60(1):58–78, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rash, M. Privacy concerns Hinder electronic medical records. The Business Journal of the Greater Triad Area. www.bizjournals.com/industries/health_care/physician_practices/2005/04/04/triad_fo, 2005.

  31. Retchin, S., and Wenzel, R., Electronic medical Record systems at academic health centers: Advantages and implementation issues. Acad. Med. 74(5):493–498, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Scott, W., Organizations rational, natural and open systems fifth edition. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle, NJ, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shortell, S., and Kaluzny, A., health Care management organizational designand behavior, 4th edition. Delmar: New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shortliffe, E., The evolution of electronic medical records. Acad. Med. 74(4):414–419, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, T., and Brailer, D., The decade of health information technology: delivering consumer-centric and information-rich health care. Framework for strategic action, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. US Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tierney, W., Overhage, J., and McDonald, C., Demonstrating the effects of an IAIMS on health care quality and cost. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4(S41–S46), 1997.

  37. White, K., Cochran, C., and Patel, U., Hospital provision of end-of-life services: Who, what, and where? Med. Care. 40(1):17–25, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Williams, S., Essentials of Health services, 3rd edition. Delmar: New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Williams, S., and Torrens, P., Introduction to health Services, 6th edition. Delmar: New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zinn, J., Proenca, J., and Rosko, M., Organizational and environmental factors in a hospital alliance membership and contract management: A resource-dependence perspective. Hosp. Health Serv. Adm. 42(1):67–86, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  41. HIMSS Data and Handbook. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. Available at www.himss.org, 2004.

  42. American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database Documentation. Prepared by Health Forum, L.L.C. Chicago, IL, 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Administration, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, 151 Rutledge Avenue Building B Room 412, P.O. Box 250961, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA

    Abby Swanson Kazley

  2. Department of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Yasar A. Ozcan

Authors
  1. Abby Swanson Kazley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yasar A. Ozcan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abby Swanson Kazley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kazley, A.S., Ozcan, Y.A. Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Hospital EMR Adoption: A National Study. J Med Syst 31, 375–384 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9079-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9079-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation