Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Evaluation of Patients’ Opinions of Primary Care Physicians: the Use of EUROPEP in Gaza Strip-Palestine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify the level of patients’ satisfaction with primary care physicians. Data were gathered from an exit interview using a standardized questionnaire (EUROPEP) and background variables. A total of 956 patients in fifteen primary health care clinics in Gaza Strip participated. Outcome measures is positive patient satisfaction (good and excellent ratings in the EUROPEP Index). As a results, the mean percentage of positive satisfaction with medical services was poor (41.8%). The poorest performance was recorded for: getting through to the clinic on the phone, being able to speak to physician on the telephone, time spent in waiting rooms and helping the patient deal with emotional problems. The comparison between clinical behaviour dimension and organization of care showed that clinical behaviour was evaluated higher. In conclusion, Palestinian patients expressed overall dissatisfaction with services provided by primary care physicians. These findings present a real challenge for Palestinian authority policy makers and administrators in terms of designing appropriate quality improvement strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu Mourad, T., Palestinian refugee conditions associated with intestinal parasites and diarrhoea: Nuseirat refugee camp as a case study. Public Health 118:131–142, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS). Small area population–population projections: revised estimates 2004–2006. Ramalla-PNA, 2005.

  3. Ministry of Health. National Strategic Health Plan (1999–2003). MOH-PNA, 1994.

  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Primary health care: Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care; Alma Ata. USSR, September 6–12, WHO, Geneva, 1978.

  5. Ministry of Health—Health Management Information System. Health Status in Palestine 1998. Palestinian National Authority. MOH-PNA, 1999.

  6. Gonzalez Lujan, L., Costa Alcaraz, A., Timoneda Aguilar, C., Alfonso Sanchez J. L., and Cortina Greus P., Survey of satisfaction among health center users. Gaceta Sanit. 7:86–94, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aguado Mingorance, J.A., Gaston Morata, J.L., Lopez Gigosos, R.M., Bueno Cavanillas, A., and Rodriguez-Contreras Pelayo, R., A survey on the satisfaction of the users of the Zaidin-Sur de Granada Health Center (1989). Rev. Sanid. Hig. Publica. (3–4):225–231, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez, M., Pico, J. A., Frau, M. J., Orozco, D., Amazarray, R., Fernandez, A., and Moreno, J., The satisfaction of the primary care consumer: a comparison between distinct models of care. Aten. Primaria. 286:288–292, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katic, M., Budak, A., Ivankovic, D., Mastilica, M., Lazic, D., Babic-Banaszak, A., and Matkovic, V., Patients’ views on the professional behaviour of family physicians. Fam. Pract. 18:42-7, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, R., Characteristics of practices, general practitioners and patients related to levels of patients’ satisfaction with consultations. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 46:601–605, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sahin, B., Yilmaz, F., and Hyung Lee, K., Factors affecting inpatient satisfaction: structural equation modeling. J. Med. Sys. 31:9–16, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Woodring, S., Polomano, R. C., Haagen, B. F., Haack, M. M., Nunn, R. R., Miller, G. I., Zarefoss, M. A., and Tan, L., Development and testing patient satisfaction measure for inpatient psychiatry care. J. Nurs. Care Qual. 19:137–147, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Donabedian, A., The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Volume 1: Exploration in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.

  14. Donabedian, A., The quality of care: how can it be assessed? J.Am. Med. Assoc. 260:1743–1748, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grol, R., Wensing, M., Mainz, J., Ferreira, P., Hearnshaw, H., Hjortdahl, P., Olesen, F., Ribacke, M., Spenser, T., and Szecsenyi, J., Patients’ priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP). Fam. Pract. 16:4–11, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abu Mourad, T., Radi, S., Shashaa, S., Lionis, C., and Philalithis, A., Palestinian primary health care in light of the National Strategic Health Plan 1999–2003. Public Health, 2007 DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.017

  17. Ware, J. E., and Hays, R. D., Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med. Care 26:393–402, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abu Mourad, T. A., Shashaa, S., Alegakis, A., Lionis, C., and Philalithis, A., Translating and validating an instrument for measuring patients’ satisfaction with primary care physicians in Palestine: the case of EUROPEP. Submitted to EJGP 2007.

  19. Kersnik, J., Svab, I., and Vegnuti, M., Frequent attenders in general practice: quality of life, patient satisfaction, use of medical services and GP characteristics. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 19:174–177, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grol, R., and Wensing, M., Patients evaluate general/family practice—The EUROPEP Instrument, Center for Quality of Care Research. Nijmegen. 9–70, 2000.

  21. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 15.0). Chicago IL-USA 2006.

  22. Epidemiological Program Office (EPI-INFO, Version 3.3.2). WHO-CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 2005.

  23. Grol, R., Wensing, M., Mainz, J., Jung, H.P., Ferreira, P., Hearnshaw, H, Hjortdahl, P., Olesen, F., Reis, S., Ribacke, M., and Szecsenyi, J.; European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care (EUROPEP). Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 50:882–887, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gadalla, M., Zaki, B., Rady, M., Anwer, W., and Sallem, I., Patient satisfaction with primary health care services in two districts in lower and Upper Egypt. East. Mediterr. Health J. 9:422–430, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuzma, W. J., Basic statistics for the health science, 2nd edn. Mountain View, CA: Mayfiled Publishing, 1992, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kirkwood, B. R., Essential for medical statistics. London: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1988, 94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bertakis, K. D., Azari, R, Helms, L. J., Callahan, E. J., and Robbins J. A., Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J. Fam. Prac. 49:147–152, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lionis, C., Tsiraki, M., Bardis, V., and Philalithis, A., Seeking quality improvement in primary care in Crete, Greece: the First Actions. Croat. Med. J. 45:599–603, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Milasauskiene, Z., Juodryte, I., Miseviciene, I., Boerma, W., and Rezgiene, R., Opinion of patients on accessibility of primary health care center in Siauliai region. Medicina (Kaunas) 42:231–237, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klingenberg, A., Bahrs, O., and Szecsenyi, J., How do patients evaluate general practice? German results from the European Project on Patients Evaluation of General Practice Care (EUROPEP). Z. Arztl. Fortbild Qualitassich 93:437–445, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Afana, A.H, Dalgard, O.S., Bjertness, E., and Grunfeld, B., The ability of general practitioners to detect mental disorders among primary care patients in a stressful environment: Gaza Strip. J. Public Health Med. 24:326–331, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wensing, M., Vedsted, P., Kersnik, J., Peerman, W., Klingenberg, A., Hearnshawa, H., Hjortdahl, P., Paulus, D., Kunzi, B., and Mendive, J., Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 14:111–118, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wensing, M., Mainz, J., Ferreira, P., Hearnshawa, H., Hjortdahl, P., Olesen, F., Reis, S., Ribacke, M., Szecsenyi, J., and Grol, R., General practice care and patients priorities in Europe: an international comparison. Health Policy 45:175–186, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kersnik, J., An evaluation of patient satisfaction with family practice care in Slovenia. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 12:143–147, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dagdeviren, N., and Akturk, Z., An evaluation of patient satisfaction in Turkey with the EUROPEP instrument. Yonsei Med. J. 45:23–28, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dansky, K.H., and Miles, J., Patient satisfaction with ambulatory health care services: waiting time and filling time. Hospital & health services administration 42:165–177, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge and thank the Palestinian American Research Center (PARC) for funding this study (which is a part of PhD Thesis for Tayser Abu Mourad). Also, many thanks to the staff of the Department of Social Medicine at the University of Crete for their continuous encouragement and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Lionis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abu Mourad, T., Shashaa, S., Markaki, A. et al. An Evaluation of Patients’ Opinions of Primary Care Physicians: the Use of EUROPEP in Gaza Strip-Palestine. J Med Syst 31, 497–503 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9090-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9090-z

Keywords

Navigation