Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to Effectively Implement an Indicator System to Improve Performance from a Management Perspective: The Case of Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses the Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) system as an example to examine which determinants would improve performance by sharing indicators from a management perspective. This study population included all 227 hospitals participating in the THIS system in 2006. A structured questionnaire was sent to the director who was responsible for the THIS system via electronic mail. A total of 111 responses were returned by February 10, 2006. Questions included current implementation and impacts of the system. Hierarchical regression models were performed to identify which variables were significantly associated with performance improvement, adjusted for hospital characteristics. Four variables significantly associated with implementing the THIS system to improve performance were ‘senior management support,’ ‘benchmarking,’ ‘making departments improve the underperforming indicators and report the improvement results in performance management meetings,’ and ‘integration with the National Health Insurance payment regulations’. This study contributes substantially to the evidence base about what works to improve performance by information sharing. Although information sharing is the basis of efforts to improve performance, senior management support and how to effectively apply the information are the most important determinants of performance enhancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mainz, J., Krog, B. R., Bjørnshave, B., and Bartels, P., Nationwide continuous quality improvement using clinical indicators: the Danish National Indicator Project. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 16:Suppl 1i45–i50, 2004. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginsburg, S. L., Factors that influence line managers’ perceptions of hospital performance data. Health Serv. Res. 38:1261–286, 2003. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.00115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kazandjian, V. A., Matthes, N., and Wicker, K. G., Are performance indicators generic? The international experience of the Quality Indicator Project. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 9:2265–276, 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00374.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mattke, S., Epstein, A. M., and Leatherman, S., The OECD health care Quality Indicators Project: history and background. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 18:suppl 11–4, 2006. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiu, W. T., Yang, C. M., Lin, H. W., and Chu, T. B., Development and implementation of a nationwide health care quality indicator system in Taiwan. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 19:121–28, 2007. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenstein, A. H., Cost-effective health care: tools for improvement. Health Care Manage. Rev. 19:253–61, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lagoe, R. J., Noetscher, C. M., and Murphy, M. E., Combined benchmarking of hospital outcomes and utilization. Nurs. Econ. 18:263–70, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Love, D. E., Paita, L. M., and Custer, W. S., Data sharing and dissemination strategies for fostering competition in health care. Health Serv. Res. 36:1 Pt 2277–290, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lagoe, R. J., and Westert, G. P., Improving outcomes with community-wide distribution of health care data. Health Care Manag. (Frederick). 29:167–76, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kazandjian, V. A., and Lied, T. R., Caesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 24:187–196, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, M. C., and Tung, Y. C., Using path analysis to examine causal relationships among balanced scorecard performance indicators for general hospitals: the case of a public hospital system in Taiwan. Health Care Manag. (Frederick). 31:4280–288, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hamilton, L. C., Regression with graphics: A second course in applied statistics. Wadsworth, CA, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor, G. T., Plume, S. K., Olmstead, E. M., Morton, J. R., and Maloney, C. T., A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 275:11841–846, 1996. doi:10.1001/jama.275.11.841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eddy, D. M., Performance measurement: problems and solutions. Health Aff. 17:47, 1998. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.17.4.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiner, B. J., Alexander, J. A., Shortell, S. M., Baker, L. C., Becker, M., and Geppert, J. J., Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators. Health Serv. Res. 41:2307–334, 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00483.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies, H. T., Public release of performance data and quality improvement: Internal responses to external data by US health care providers. Qual. Health Care. 10:2104–110, 2001. doi:10.1136/qhc.10.2.104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bentler, P. M., and Chou, C. P., Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. 16:178–117, 1987. doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Chi Tung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tung, YC., Yang, MC. How to Effectively Implement an Indicator System to Improve Performance from a Management Perspective: The Case of Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) System. J Med Syst 33, 215–221 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9182-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9182-4

Keywords

Navigation