Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combining Communication Technology Utilization and Organizational Innovation: Evidence from Canadian Healthcare Decision Makers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Organizational Innovation (OI) are seen as the miracle of post-modernity in organizations. In this way, they are supposed to resolve most organizational problems, efficiently and rapidly. OI is highly dependent on the capacity and the investment in knowledge management (internal and external) to support decision making process and to implement significant changes. We know what explains ICT utilization (ICTU) and what determines OI development (OID) in healthcare services. Moreover, the literature tends to link ICTU to OID and vice versa. However, this dependency has never been explored empirically through the lens of roles combination. To identify the existing combined roles profiles of ICTU and OID among healthcare decision makers and determine factors of the shift from a profile to another. We did the following: (1) a structured review of the literature on healthcare management by focusing on ICTU and OID which allowed us to build two indexes and a comprehensive framework; (2) a copula methodology to identify with high precision the thresholds for ICTU and OID; and (3) a cross-sectional study based on a survey done with a sample of 942 decision makers from Canadian healthcare organizations through a multinomial logit model to identify determinants of the shift. ICTU and OID are correlated at 22% (Kendal’s Tau). The joint distribution (combination) of ICTU and OID shows that four major profiles exist among decision makers in Canadian healthcare organizations: the traditional decision maker, the innovative decision maker, the technologic decision maker and the contemporary decision maker. We found out that classic factors act as barriers to the shift from one profile to the desired profile (from 1 to 4, from 2 to 4 and from 3 to 4). We have identified that the attitude toward research and relational capital are transversal barriers of shift. We have also found that some factors have a specific impact such as engaging in activities of research acquisition, the administrative position (being a manager), the preference for applied research results as source of information, the degree of novelty of research results, and the gender. Modern Canadian healthcare organizations need contemporary decision makers who use ICT and develop OI, if performance is the target. Our results let us suggest that the isolated administrative agents profile is no more effective in a dynamic and changing world. Contemporary decision makers need to be more active intellectually and to take risks in their decisions. Relying exclusively on research results and on their social network is no more helpful for a real shift. Moreover, the traditional factors, i.e. organization size, time, experience…are no more effective, especially when we consider combined roles. We propose some practical and theoretical recommendations to support these changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahire, S. L., and Devaray, S., An empirical comparison of statistical construct validation approaches. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 48:3319–329, 2001. doi:10.1109/17.946530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albury, D., Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money Manag. 25:51–56, 2005, January.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfred Li-Ping, C., ICT industry development strategies and the formation of industrial innovation systems on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 32:3/4264, 2005. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2005.007333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atun, R., Gurol-Uriganci, I., et al., Uptake and diffusion of pharmaceutical innovations in health systems. Int. J. Innov. Manage. 11:2299–321, 2007. doi:10.1142/S1363919607001709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atun, R. A., Kyratsis, I., et al., Diffusion of complex health innovations—implementation of primary health care reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Health Policy Plan. 22:128–39, 2007. doi:10.1093/heapol/czl031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basrak, B., Klaassen, C. A. J., et al., Copulas in QTL mapping. Behav. Genet. 34:161–171, 2004. doi:10.1023/B:BEGE.0000013730.63991.ba.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bessant, J., Enabling continuous and discontinuous innovation: Learning from the private sector. Public Money Manag. 25:135–42, 2005 January.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boonstra, J., and Vink, M., Technological and organizational innovation: A dilemma for fundamental change and participation. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 6:84–112, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bridges, J., Fitzgerald, L., et al., New workforce roles in health care: Exploring the longer-term journey of organisational innovations. J. Health Organ. Manag. 21:4–5381–392, 2007. doi:10.1108/14777260710778916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Broos, A., Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: male self-assurance and female hesitation. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8:121–31, 2005. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calista, D. J., and Melitski, J., E-Governement and E-governance: Converging constructs of public sector informations and communications technologies. Public Adm. Q. 31:187–120, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canadian Health Facilities Directory, http://www.canadianhealthfacilities.com/. Accessed on April 2001.

  13. Canadian Institute for Health Information, National Health Expenditure Trends, 1975–2007. http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page=AR_31_E, 2007.

  14. Damanpour, F., and Schneider, M., Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. Br. J. Manage. 17:3215–236, 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Djellal, F., and Gallouj, F., Innovation in hospitals: A survey of the literature. Eur. J. Health Econ. 8:3181–193, 2007. doi:10.1007/s10198-006-0016-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dobrow, M. J., Goel, V., et al., Evidence-based health policy: Context and utilisation. Soc. Sci. Med. 58:1207–217, 2004. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00166-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. England, I., and Stewart, D., Executive management and IT innovation in health: Identifying the barriers to adoption. Health Informatics J. 13:275–87, 2007. doi:10.1177/1460458207076462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fenton, S. H., and Gamm, L. D., Evaluation and management documentation and coding technology adoption. Perspect. Health Inf. Manag. 4:7, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gagliardini, P., and Gouriéroux, C., An efficient nonparametric estimator for models with nonlinear dependence. J. Econom. 137:189–229, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hankivsky, O., and Blackwood, E., Gender, diversity and evidence-based decision-making. Health Law Can. 28:11–15, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen, M. T., and Birkinshaw, J., The innovation value chain. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85:6121–30, 2007142.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Helfrich, C. D., Weiner, B. J., et al., Determinants of implementation effectiveness: Adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med. Care Res. Rev. 64:3279–303, 2007. doi:10.1177/1077558707299887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurley, A. C., Bane, A., et al., Nurses’ satisfaction with medication administration point-of-care technology. J. Nurs. Adm. 37:7–8343–349, 2007. doi:10.1097/01.NNA.0000285114.60689.02.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Iakovidis, I., and Purcarea, O., eHealth in Europe: From vision to reality. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 134:163–168, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jbilou, J., and Amara, N., Research-based-decision-making in Canadian health organizations: a behavioural approach. J. Med. Syst. 31:3185–196, 2007. doi:10.1007/s10916-007-9054-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kern, L. M., and Kaushal, R., Health information technology and health information exchange in New York State: New initiatives in implementation and evaluation. J. Biomed. Inform. 40:6S17–S20, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirigia, J. M., and Seddoh, A., E-health: determinants, opportunities, challenges and the way forward for countries in the WHO African Region. BMC Public Health. 5:137, 2005. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McInnes, D., Ladon, B., et al., The impact of a quality improvement program on systems, processes, and structures in medical clinics. Med. Care 45(5):463–71, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer, L. D., Hodgkinson, A. R., et al., Graduate capabilities for health service managers: Reconfiguring health management education @UNSW. Aust. Health Rev. 31:3379–384, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Millward, L. J., and Freeman, H., Role expectations as constraints to innovation: The case of female managers. Creativity Res. J. 14:193–109, 2002. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nelsen, R. B., An introduction to Copulas. Springer, New York, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Neumann, E., and Prusak, L., Knowledge networks in the age of the semantic Web. Brief. Bioinform. 8:3141–1419, 2007. doi:10.1093/bib/bbm013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Orton, S., Umble, K., et al., Management academy for public health: Creating entrepreneurial managers. Am. J. Public Health. 97:4601–605, 2007. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.082263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reid, J., A telemedicine primer: Understanding the issues. Artcraft Printers, Billings, MT, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scott’s Government, Index Scott’s Government Index. Southam Information Products Group. Ontario, CA, Don Mills, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sklar, A., Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris. 8:229–231, 1959.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Solomon, M. R., Regional health information organizations: A vehicle for transforming health care delivery? J. Med. Syst. 31:135–47, 2007. doi:10.1007/s10916-006-9041-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Syvajarvi, A., and Stenvall, J., et al., The impact of information technology on human capacity, interprofessional practice and management. Probl Perspectives Manag. 1:82–95, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tamburis, O., The specific role of ICT: different perspectives between traditional healthcare service and e-healthcare service. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 2:3250–262, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tyrrell, S., Using information and communication technology in healthcare. Radcliffe Medical Press, London, UK, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Viney, M. A., and Rivers, N., Frontline managers lead an innovative improvement model. Nurs. Manage. 38:610, 14, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weiss, C. H., The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm. Rev. 39:5426–431, 1979. doi:10.2307/3109916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Williams, D., Hammes, P., Real options reasoning in healthcare: an integrative approach and synopsis. J. Healthc. Manag. 52(3):170–186, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wolfe, R. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique, and suggested research directions. J. Manage. Stud. 31(3):405–31, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, C. W., and Fang, S. C., Isomorphic pressures, institutional strategies, and knowledge creation in the health care sector. Health Care Manage. Rev. 32:3263–270, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

    Jalila Jbilou, Réjean Landry & Nabil Amara

  2. Université du Québec, INRS-ETE, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

    Salaheddine El Adlouni

Authors
  1. Jalila Jbilou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Réjean Landry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nabil Amara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salaheddine El Adlouni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jalila Jbilou.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 3 Correlations between continuous explanatory variables
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 4 Measure of explanatory variables
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jbilou, J., Landry, R., Amara, N. et al. Combining Communication Technology Utilization and Organizational Innovation: Evidence from Canadian Healthcare Decision Makers. J Med Syst 33, 275–286 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9188-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9188-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation