Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Critical Factors Influencing Hospitals’ Adoption of HL7 Version 2 Standards: An Empirical Investigation

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industry predictions focus on future e-hospitals that will integrate all stakeholders into a seamless network, allowing data to be shared. The Health Level Seven (HL7) is a standard for the interchange of data within the healthcare industry. It simplifies communication interfaces and allows the interoperability among heterogeneous applications. Although the benefits of adopting HL7 are well known, only a few hospitals in Taiwan have actually adopted it. What are the reasons behind the hospitals’ lack of intention to adopt HL7? Most prior studies on HL7 have focused on technical issues and general overlooked the managerial side. This has caused a lack of understanding of factors influencing hospitals’ decision on HL7 adoption. In fact, main reasons behind a hospital’s decision on whether to adopt an innovative technology are more often related to organizational than purely technical issues. Hence, we pay our attention to these organizational considerations over HL7 adoption. Based on the Innovation Diffusion Theory, we proposed a research model to explore the critical factors influencing Taiwan hospitals’ adoption intention of HL7. 472 questionnaires were distributed to all accredited hospitals in Taiwan and 122 were returned. The valid response rate was 25.21% (119). Factor analysis, logistic regression and Pearson Chi-square test were conducted to verify the research model. The results showed that environmental pressure, top management attitude towards HL7, staff’s technology capability, system integrity, and hospital’s scale were critical factors influencing hospitals’ intention on whether to adopt HL7. The research findings provided the government, the healthcare industry, the hospital administrators and the academia with practical and theoretical references. These factors should be considered in planning promotion plan to encourage hospital adoption of HL7. This study also opens up a new research direction as well as a new viewpoint, and consequentially improves the completeness of related researches in the medical informatics discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Randeree, E., and Rao, H. R., E-health and assurance: Curing hospital websites. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 1(1):33–46, 2004. doi:10.1504/IJEH.2004.004653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin, I. C., Hsu, H. M., and Liu, C. T., A HL7 transformer application for vaccination data report. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 2(2):117–131, 2006. doi:10.1504/IJEH.2006.008827.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bates, D. W., Ebell, M., Gotlieb, E., Zapp, J., and Mullins, H. C., A proposal for electronic medical records in US primary care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(1):1–10, 2003. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, J., and Du, H., Setting up a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) for a healthcare system. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 1(3):335–348, 2005. doi:10.1504/IJEH.2005.006479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wickramasinghe, N., and Misra, S. K., A wireless trust model for healthcare. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 1(1):60–77, 2004. doi:10.1504/IJEH.2004.004658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demiris, G., Electronic home healthcare: Concepts and challenges. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 1(1):4–16, 2004. doi:10.1504/IJEH.2004.004655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ptochos, D., Panopoulos, D., Metaxiotis, K., Askounis, D., and Psarras, J., Using internet GIS technology for early warning, response and controlling the quality of the public health sector. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 1(1):78–101, 2004. doi:10.1504/IJEH.2004.004661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olsen, P. S., Aspects of integration in HIS. Int. J. Med. Inform. 39(1):53–57, 1995. doi:10.1016/0020-7101(94)01079-GDOI:dx.doi.org.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Blobel, B., and Holena, M., Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 45:40–47, 1997. PubMed ID 10175370.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, E. W., Hsiao, S. H., and Liou, D. M., Design and implementation of a web-based HL7 message generation and validation system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 70(1):49–58, 2003. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00006-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blobel, B., Object-oriented middleware architectures-trends for distributed health information systems. Bulletin SSIM-SGMI 34:4–8, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Witte, C. L., Grunhagen, M., and Clarke, R. L., The integration of EDI and the internet. Inf. Syst. Manage. 20(4):58–65, 2003. doi:10.1201/1078/43647.20.4.20030901/77294.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiasson, M. W., and Davidson, E., Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research. Inf. Organ. 14(3):155–188, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, I. C., Hou, Y. H., Huang, H. L., Chu, T. P., and Chang, R. E., Managing nursing assistants with a web-based system: An empirical investigation of the mixed-staff strategy. J. Med. Syst. 34:341–348, 2010. doi:10.1007/s10916-008-9246-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vest, J. R., Healthcare information exchange and healthcare utilization. J. Med. Syst. 33(3):223–231, 2009. doi:10.1007/s10916-008-9183-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hammond, W. E., The status of healthcare standards in the United States. Int. J. Med. Inform. 39(1):87–92, 1995. doi:10.1016/0020-7101(94)01084-E.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fichman, R. G., Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts and methods. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 5(8):314–355, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kimberly, J. R., and Evanisko, M. J., Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad. Manage. J. 24(4):689–713, 1981. PubMed ID 10253688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thong, J. Y. L., An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 15(4):187–214, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovations. Free, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J., The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis. Sci. 28(3):557–582, 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovations (5th ed). Free, New York, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper, R. B., and Zmud, R. W., Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Manage. Sci. 36(2):123–139, 1990. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grover, V., and Goslar, M. D., The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in U.S. organizations. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 10(1):141–163, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I., Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3):192–222, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chau, P. Y. K., and Tam, K. Y., Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: an exploratory study. MIS Q 21(1):1–24, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A. S., Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Q 19(4):465–485, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuan, K. K. Y., and Chau, P. Y. K., A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Inf. Manage. 38(8):507–521, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00073-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tornatzky, L. G., and Klein, K. J., Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 29(1):28–45, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  30. O’Callaghan, R., Kaufmann, P. J., and Konsynski, B. R., Adoption correlates and share effects of electronic data interchange systems in marketing channels. J. Mark. 56(2):45–56, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Crum, M., Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 6(2):107–121, 1997. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moon, M. J., and Bretschneider, S., Can state government actions affect innovation and its diffusion?: An extended communication model and empirical test. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 54(1):57–77, 1997. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00121-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Soliman, K. S., and Janz, B. D., An exploratory study to identify the critical factors affecting the decision to establish Internet-based interorganizational information systems. Inf. Manage. 41(6):697–706, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ratnasingham, P., and Swatman, P., EDI Security: A model of EDI risks and associated controls. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 5(2):63–71, 1997. doi:10.1108/09685229710182848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Premkumar, G., and Ramamurthy, K., The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decis. Sci. 26(3):303–336, 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01431.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Premkumar, G., and Roberts, M., Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega-Int. J. Manag. Sci. 27(4):467–484, 1999. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00071-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thong, J. Y. L., and Yap, C. S., CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses. Omega-Int. J. Manag. Sci. 23(4):429–442, 1995. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00017-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiménez-Martine, J., and Polo-Redondo, Y., Key variables in the EDI adoption by retail firms. Technovation 21(6):385–394, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00035-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Raymond, L., and Blili, S., Adopting EDI in a network enterprise: The case of subcontracting SMEs. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 3(3):165–175, 1997. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(97)00008-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Nilakanta, S., Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 11:157–187, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Johnston, H. R., and Vitale, M. R., Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Q 12(2):153–165, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Angeles, R., Corritore, C. L., Basu, S. C., and Nath, R., Success factors for domestic and international electronic data interchange (EDI) implementation for US firms. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 21:329–347, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(01)00028-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Susarla, A., Barua, A., and Whinston, A. B., Understanding the service component of application service provision: An empirical analysis of satisfaction with ASP services. MIS Q 27(1):91–123, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Department of Health, Taiwan (DOH), 2008 report, Number and list of hospitals by accreditation, http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DisplayStatisticFile.aspx?d=68616, Accessed on 2008.

  45. Armstrong, J. S., and Overton, T. S., Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 14(3):396–402, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., and Sheng, O. R. L., Adoption of telemedicine technology by health care organizations: An exploratory study. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 12(3):197–221, 2002. doi:10.1207/S15327744JOCE120301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L., Multivariate data analysis (6th ed). Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2006.

  48. Sobol, M. G., Alverson, M., and Lei, D., Barriers to the adoption of computerized technology in health care systems. Top. Health Inf. Manage. 19(4):1–19, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gable, G. G., Consultant engagement for computer system selection: A pro-active client role in small businesses. Inf. Manage. 20(2):83–93, 1991. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(91)90046-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schadow, G., Russler, D. C., and McDonald, C. J., Conceptual alignment of electronic health record data with guideline and workflow knowledge. Int. J. Med. Inform. 64(2–3):259–274, 2001. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00196-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Coyle, J. F., Mori, A. R., and Huff, S. M., Standards for detailed clinical models as the basis for medical data exchange and decision support. Int. J. Med. Inform. 69(2–3):157–174, 2003. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00103-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Chun Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, CH., Lin, IC., Roan, JS. et al. Critical Factors Influencing Hospitals’ Adoption of HL7 Version 2 Standards: An Empirical Investigation. J Med Syst 36, 1183–1192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9580-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9580-2

Keywords

Navigation