Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Association between Computer Literacy and Training on Clinical Productivity and User Satisfaction in Using the Electronic Medical Record in Saudi Arabia

  • Education & Training
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The association of computer literacy, training on clinical productivity and satisfaction of a recently implemented Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system in Prince Sultan Medical Military City ((PSMMC)) was investigated. The scope of this study was to explore the association between age, occupation and computer literacy and clinical productivity and users’ satisfaction of the newly implemented EMR at PSMMC as well as the association of user satisfaction with age and position. A self-administrated questionnaire was distributed to all doctors and nurses working in Alwazarat Family and Community Center (a Health center in PSMMC). A convenience sample size of 112 healthcare providers (65 Nurses and 47 physicians) completed the questionnaire. A combination of correlation, One Way ANOVA and t-tests were used to answer the research questions. Participants had high levels of self-reported literacy on computers and satisfaction of the system. Both levels were higher among physicians than among nurses. A moderate but significant (at p < 0.01 level) correlation was found between computer literacy and users’ satisfaction towards the system (R = 0.343). Age was weakly, but significantly (at p < 0.05), positively correlated with satisfaction with the system (R = 0.29). Self-reported system productivity and satisfaction was statistically correlated at p < 0.01 (R = 0.509). High level of satisfaction with training on using the system was not positively correlated with overall satisfaction of using the system. This study demonstrated that EMR users with high computer literacy skills were more satisfied with using the EMR than users with low computer literacy skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garets, D., and Davis, M., Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Health Records: yes, there is a difference. A HIMSS AnalyticsTM White Paper. 2006.

  2. Satinsky, M., Electronic Medical Records. Satinsky Consulting, LLC. 2003.

  3. Miller, R., and Sim, I., Physicians’ use of Electronic Medical Records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff. J. 23(2):116–126, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., Bardon, C. G., Spurr, C. D., Carchidi, P. J., Kittler, A. F. et al., A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am. J. Med. 114(5):397–403, 2003.

  5. Jhon, O., Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies. Health Policy 84(2, 3):181–190, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morton, M., Use and Acceptance of an Electronic Health Record: Factors Affecting Physician Attitudes. PHD’s. Thesis, Drexel University, 2008.

  7. Chisolm, D., et al., Clinician perceptions of an electronic medical record during the first year of implementation in emergency services. Pediatr Emerg Care 26(2):107–110, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boonstra, A., and Broekhuis, M., Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC 10:231, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raman, S., Harris, I. B., Connelly, D. P., Speedie, S. M., and Daniels, B., Evaluation of the implementation of an electronic medical record. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2003, p. 979. American Medical Informatics Association, 2003.

  10. Grams, R., The “New” America Electronic Medical Record (EMR)—design criteria and challenge. J Med Syst 33:409–411, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Terry, A., et al., Implementing electronic health records Key factors in primary care. CFP 54(5):730–736, 2008.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dansky, K., et al., Electronic medical records: are physicians ready? J Healthc Manag 44(6):440–445, 1999.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nour-Eldin, M., Physicians’ use of and attitudes toward Electronic Medical Record System implemented at a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia. EPHA 82(5–6):348–364, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. AL-nassar, B., et al., Overcoming challenges to use Electronic Medical Records System (EMRs) in Jordan Hospitals. IJCSNS 11(8):51–58, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alanazy, S., Factors associated with implementation of electronic health records in Saudi Arabia. PHD’s thesis. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 2006.

  16. Paton, C., Househ, M., and Malik, M., The challenges of publishing on health informatics in developing countries. Appl. Clin. Inform. 4:428–433, 2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aldabbagh, D., Alsharif, K., and Househ, M., Health information in the Arab World. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 190:297–299, 2013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kushniruk, A. W., Bates, D. W., Bainbridge, M., Househ, M. S., and Borycki, E. M., National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform 82(5):e149–e160, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ababtain, A. F., Almulhim, D. A., and Househ, M. S., The state of mobile health in the developing world and the Middle East. Stud. Health Technol. Inform 190:300–2, 2013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alajmi, D., Almansour, S., and Househ, M., Recommendations for implementing telemedicine in the developing world. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 190:118–120, 2013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Househ, M., The use of social media in healthcare: organizational, clinical, and patient perspectives. Stud. Health Technol Inform 183:244–8, 2013.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Borycki, E. M., Househ, M. S., Kushniruk, A. W., Nohr, C., and Takeda, H., Empowering patients: making health information and systems safer for patients and the public contribution of the IMIA Health Informatics for Patient Safety Working Group. Yearb. Med. Inform. 7(1):56–64, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Almutairi, M. S., Alseghayyir, R. M., Al-Alshikh, A. A., Arafah, H. M., and Househ, M. S., Implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) features in Riyadh Hospitals to improve quality of information. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 180:776–780, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Househ, M., Ahmad, A., Alshaikh, A., and Alsuweed, F., Patient safety perspectives: the impact of CPOE on nursing workflow. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 183:367–371, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Househ, M. S., and Al-Tuwaijri, M., Early development of an enterprise health data warehouse. Stud. Health Inf. Technol. 164:122–126, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Househ, M., Al-Tuwaijri, M., and Al-Dosari, B., Establishing an Electronic Health Center of Research Excellence (E-CoRE) within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Health Inform. Dev. Countries 4(1):41–45, 2010.

  27. Laerum, H., Ellingsen, G., and Faxvaag, A., Doctors use of Electronic Medical Records systems in hospitals - cross sectional survey. BMJ 323(7325):1344–1348, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grams, R., and Morgan, G., Medical record innovations that can improve physician productivity. J Med Syst 26(6):529–543, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohammed, B, and El-naif, M., Physicians’, Nurses’ and Patients’ perception with hospital medical records at a military hospital in Riyadh. SSFCM. 12(1):49–53, 2005.

  30. Bizagi and eMedServe. RMH delivers high quality patient care with a collaborative and interdisciplinary BPM system built on Bizagi. Saudi Arabia. 2012. http://www.bizagi.com/docs/RMH-CaseStudy-Eng.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2014.

  31. Rosemann, M., and Bruin, T., Towards a business process management maturity model. ECIS, 37, 2005.

  32. Reynaldo, J., Cronbach’s Alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. JOE 37:2, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nunnaly, J., and Bernstein, I., Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Alharbi, A., Healthcare providers’ perceptions towards health information applications at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Saudi Arabia. IJACSA 2(10):10–13, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ash, J., and Bates, D., Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. JAMIA 12:8–12, 2005.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Almujaini, A., et al., Satisfaction and perceived quality of an Electronic Medical Record System in a tertiary hospital in Oman. Oman J. Med. Syst. 26(5):324–328, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Hisham Alkhashan, who helped us in coordination within PSMMC hospital, the help from all MedIcen team in PSMMCis highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mowafa Househ.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Education & Training

Appendix

Appendix

figure afigure afigure afigure afigure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alasmary, M., El Metwally, A. & Househ, M. The Association between Computer Literacy and Training on Clinical Productivity and User Satisfaction in Using the Electronic Medical Record in Saudi Arabia. J Med Syst 38, 69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0069-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0069-2

Keywords

Navigation