Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Operating Room Metrics Score Card—Creating a Prototype for Individualized Feedback

  • Patient Facing Systems
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The balance between reducing costs and inefficiencies with that of patient safety is a challenging problem faced in the operating room suite. An ongoing challenge is the creation of effective strategies that reduce these inefficiencies and provide real-time personalized metrics and electronic feedback to anesthesia practitioners. We created a sample report card structure, utilizing existing informatics systems. This system allows to gather and analyze operating room metrics for each anesthesia provider and offer personalized feedback. To accomplish this task, we identified key metrics that represented time and quality parameters. We collected these data for individual anesthesiologists and compared performance to the overall group average. Data were presented as an electronic score card and made available to individual clinicians on a real-time basis in an effort to provide effective feedback. These metrics included number of cancelled cases, average turnover time, average time to operating room ready and patient in room, number of delayed first case starts, average induction time, average extubation time, average time to recovery room arrival to discharge, performance feedback from other providers, compliance to various protocols, and total anesthetic costs. The concept we propose can easily be generalized to a variety of operating room settings, types of facilities and OR health care professionals. Such a scorecard can be created using content that is important for operating room efficiency, research, and practice improvement for anesthesia providers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cima, R. R., Brown, M. J., Hebl, J. R., Moore, R., Rogers, J. C., Kollengode, A., et al., Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a high-volume tertiary-care academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 213(1):83–92, 2011. discussion 3–4. Epub 2011/03/23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krupka, D. C., and Sandberg, W. S., Operating room design and its impact on operating room economics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19(2):185–91, 2006. Epub 2006/03/23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kodali, B. S., Kim, D., Bleday, R., Flanagan, H., and Urman, R. D., Successful strategies for the reduction of operating room turnover times in a tertiary care academic medical center. J Surg Res 187(2):403–11, 2014. Epub 2014/01/01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman, D. M., Sokal, S. M., Chang, Y., and Berger, D. L., Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Ann Surg 243(1):10–4, 2006. Epub 2005/12/24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harders, M., Malangoni, M. A., Weight, S., and Sidhu, T., Improving operating room efficiency through process redesign. Surgery 140(4):509–14, 2006. discussion 14–6. Epub 2006/10/03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stahl, J. E., Sandberg, W. S., Daily, B., Wiklund, R., Egan, M. T., Goldman, J. M., et al., Reorganizing patient care and workflow in the operating room: a cost-effectiveness study. Surgery 139(6):717–28, 2006. Epub 2006/06/20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sokal, S. M., Craft, D. L., Chang, Y., Sandberg, W. S., and Berger, D. L., Maximizing operating room and recovery room capacity in an era of constrained resources. Arch Surg 141(4):389–93, 2006. discussion 93–5. Epub 2006/04/19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodali, B. S., Kim, K. D., Flanagan, H., Ehrenfeld, J. M., and Urman, R. D., Variability of subspecialty-specific anesthesia-controlled times at two academic institutions. J Med Syst 38(2):11, 2014. Epub 2014/01/29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Willig, J. H., Krawitz, M., Panjamapirom, A., Ray, M. N., Nevin, C. R., English, T. M., et al., Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings. Journal of medical systems 37(2):9905, 2013. Epub 2013/01/24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benn, J., Arnold, G., Wei, I., Riley, C., and Aleva, F., Using quality indicators in anaesthesia: feeding back data to improve care. Br J Anaesth 109(1):80–91, 2012. Epub 2012/06/05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Veer, S. N., de Keizer, N. F., Ravelli, A. C., Tenkink, S., and Jager, K. J., Improving quality of care. A systematic review on how medical registries provide information feedback to health care providers. Int J Med Inform. 79(5):305–23, 2010. Epub 2010/03/02.

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Vos, M., Graafmans, W., Kooistra, M., Meijboom, B., Van Der Voort, P., and Westert, G., Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care 21(2):119–29, 2009. Epub 2009/01/22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hysong, S. J., Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care 47(3):356–63, 2009. Epub 2009/02/06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jamtvedt, G., Young, J. M., Kristoffersen, D. T., O'Brien, M. A., and Oxman, A. D., Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 15(6):433–6, 2006. Epub 2006/12/05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Veloski, J., Boex, J. R., Grasberger, M. J., Evans, A., and Wolfson, D. B., Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 28(2):117–28, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mugford, M., Banfield, P., and O’Hanlon, M., Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. BMJ 303(6799):398–402, 1991. Epub 1991/08/17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaye, A. D., Okanlawon, O. J., and Urman, R. D., Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians. Adv Med Educ Pract. 5:115–23, 2014. Epub 2014/05/17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peccora, C. D., Gimlich, R., Cornell, R. P., Vacanti, C. A., Ehrenfeld, J. M., and Urman, R. D., Anesthesia report card - a customizable tool for performance improvement. Journal of medical systems 38(9):105, 2014. Epub 2014/07/21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glossary of times used for scheduling and monitoring of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. AORN Journal. 1997;66(4):601–6. Epub 1997/10/24.

  20. Kodali, B. S., Kim, K. D., Flanagan, H., Ehrenfeld, J. M., and Urman, R. D., Variability of subspecialty-specific anesthesia-controlled times at two academic institutions. Journal of Medical Systems 38(2):11, 2014. Epub 2014/01/29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Friedman, D. M., Sokal, S. M., Chang, Y., and Berger, D. L., Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Annals of Surgery 243(1):10–4, 2006. Epub 2005/12/24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sokal, S. M., Craft, D. L., Chang, Y., Sandberg, W. S., and Berger, D. L., Maximizing operating room and recovery room capacity in an era of constrained resources. Archives of Surgery 141(4):389–93, 2006. discussion 93–5. Epub 2006/04/19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heidegger, T., Husemann, Y., Nuebling, M., Morf, D., Sieber, T., Huth, A., et al., Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care: development of a psychometric questionnaire and benchmarking among six hospitals in Switzerland and Austria. British Journal of Anaesthesia 89(6):863–72, 2002. Epub 2002/11/28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard D. Urman.

Additional information

This work attributed to: Dept. of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Patient Facing Systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gabriel, R.A., Gimlich, R., Ehrenfeld, J.M. et al. Operating Room Metrics Score Card—Creating a Prototype for Individualized Feedback. J Med Syst 38, 144 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0144-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0144-8

Keywords

Navigation