Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome Prediction in Clinical Treatment Processes

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical outcome prediction, as strong implications for health service delivery of clinical treatment processes (CTPs), is important for both patients and healthcare providers. Prior studies typically use a priori knowledge, such as demographics or patient physical factors, to estimate clinical outcomes at early stages of CTPs (e.g., admission). They lack the ability to deal with temporal evolution of CTPs. In addition, most of the existing studies employ data mining or machine learning methods to generate a prediction model for a specific type of clinical outcome, however, a mathematical model that predicts multiple clinical outcomes simultaneously, has not yet been established. In this study, a hybrid approach is proposed to provide a continuous predictive monitoring service on multiple clinical outcomes. More specifically, a probabilistic topic model is applied to discover underlying treatment patterns of CTPs from electronic medical records. Then, the learned treatment patterns, as low-dimensional features of CTPs, are exploited for clinical outcome prediction across various stages of CTPs based on multi-label classification. The proposal is evaluated to predict three typical classes of clinical outcomes, i.e., length of stay, readmission time, and the type of discharge, using 3492 pieces of patients’ medical records of the unstable angina CTP, extracted from a Chinese hospital. The stable model was characterized by 84.9% accuracy and 6.4% hamming-loss with 3 latent treatment patterns discovered from data, which outperforms the benchmark multi-label classification algorithms for clinical outcome prediction. Our study indicates the proposed approach can potentially improve the quality of clinical outcome prediction, and assist physicians to understand the patient conditions, treatment inventions, and clinical outcomes in an integrated view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 4
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang, Z., Juarze, J. M., Duan, H., and Li, H., Length of stay prediction for clinical treatment process using temporal similarity. Expert Sys Appli 40(16):6330–6339, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang, Z., Lu, X., Duan, H., and Fan, W., Summarizing clinical pathways from event logs. J Biomed Inform 46(1):111–127, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, Z., Dong, W., Ji, L., Gan, C., Lu, X., and Duan, H., Discovery of clinical pathway patterns from event logs using probabilistic topic models. J Biomed Inform 47:39–57, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gang, D., Zhibin, J., Xiaodi, D., and Yang, Y., Intelligent ensemble T–S fuzzy neural networks with RCDPSO_DM optimization for effective handling of complex clinical pathway variances. Comput Biol Med 43(6):613–634, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhengxing Huang, Xudong Lu, Chenxi Gan, and Huilong Duan. Variation prediction in clinical processes. In M. Peleg, N. Lavrac, & C. Combi (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Lecture notes in computer science (vol. 6747, pp. 286–295). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer

  6. Yang, C.-S., Wei, C.-P., Yuan, C.-C., and Schoung, J.-Y., Predicting the length of hospital stay of burn patients: comparisons of prediction accuracy among different clinical stages. Decis Support Syst 50(1):325–335, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng, S.-K., McLachlan, G. J., and Lee, A. H., An incremental EM-based learning approach for on-line prediction of hospital resource utilization. Artif Intell Med 36(3):257–267, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tu, J. V., and Michael, R. J. G., Use of a neural network as a predictive instrument for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery. Comput Biomed Res 26(3):220–229, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, D., Shin, H., Young, S. S., and Ju Han, K., Synergistic effect of different levels of genomic data for cancer clinical outcome prediction. J Biomed Inform 45(6):1191–1198, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adeyemi, S., Demir, E., and Chaussalet, T., Towards an evidence-based decision making healthcare system management: modelling patient pathways to improve clinical outcomes. Decis Support Syst 55(1):117–125, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Charlene, R., Staggers, W. N., and Tamara, L., Reviewing the impact of computerized provider order entry on clinical outcomes: the quality of systematic reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics 81(4):219–231, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhengxing Huang, Xudong Lu, Huilong Duan. Anomaly detection for clinical processes, AIMA2012

  13. Stefania Montani, Giorgio Leonardi: Retrieval and clustering for supporting business process adjustment and analysis. Inf. Syst. 40: 128–141, 2014.

  14. Lu, X., Zhengxing, H., and Huilong, D., Supporting adaptive clinical treatment processes through recommendations. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 107(3):413–424, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Z., Lu, X., and Duan, H., Latent treatment pattern discovery for clinical processes. J Med Syst 37(2):1–10, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsoumakas, G., and Katakis, I., Multi-label classification: an overview. Int J Data Ware Min 3(3):1–13, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehman, L., Adams, R., Mayaud, L., Moody, G., Malhotra, A., Mark, R., Nemati, S. A Physiological Time Series Dynamics-Based Approach to Patient Monitoring and Outcome Prediction, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2330827.

  18. Gang, D., Jiang, Z., Yang, Y., and Diao, X., Clinical pathways scheduling using hybrid genetic algorithm. J Med Syst 37:9945, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., and Jordan, M. I., Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(4–5):993–1022, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jesse Read, Bernhard Pfahringer, Geoff Holmes, and Eibe Frank. 2009. Classifier Chains for Multi-label Classification. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Part II (ECML PKDD '09), pp:254–269, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.

  21. Elisseeff, A., and Weston, J., A kernel method for multi-labelled classification. In Advances in Neural Inform Proc Syst 14:681–687, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, M.-L., and Zhou, Z.-H., A k-nearest neighbor based algorithm for multi-label classification, 2005 I.E. international conference on granular computing, 2:718–721, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Catherwood, E., and O’Rourke, D. J., Critical pathway management of unstable angina. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 3(3):121–148, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 2012ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update). Circulation, 126(7):875–910, 2012.

  25. Wei Dong, Zhengxing Huang, Lei Ji, Huilong Duan. A genetic fuzzy system for unstable angina risk assessment, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14:12, 2014

  26. MEKA, http://meka.sourceforge.net/. Last access on 2014-4-30.

  27. Madjarov, G., Kocev, D., Gjorgjevikj, D., and Džeroski, S., An extensive experimental comparison of methods for multi-label learning. Pattern Recogn 45(9):3084–3104, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gultepe, E., Green, J. P., Hien, N., Jason, A., Timothy, A., and Ilias, T., From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: a machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21(2):315–325, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Traber Davis Giardina, Shailaja Menon, Danielle E Parrish, Dean F Sittig, Hardeep Singh. Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review, J Am Med Inform Assoc, Published Online First: 23 October 2013, doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002239.

  30. Zifang Huang, Mei-Ling Shyu, Tien, J.M., Vigoda, M.M., Birnbach, D.J. Knowledge-Assisted Sequential Pattern Analysis With Heuristic Parameter Tuning for Labor Contraction Prediction, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics,18(2):492–499, 2014.

  31. Huang, Z., Dong, W., Ji, L., Bath, P., and Duan, H., On mining latent treatment patterns from electronic medical records. Data Min Knowl Disc 29(4):914–949, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant No 81101126 and 61562088, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No 2014QNA5014. The author would like to give special thanks to all experts who cooperate in the evaluation of the proposed method.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengxing Huang.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Dong, W., Ji, L. et al. Outcome Prediction in Clinical Treatment Processes. J Med Syst 40, 8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0380-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0380-6

Keywords

Navigation