Skip to main content
Log in

Variability Analysis of Therapeutic Movements using Wearable Inertial Sensors

  • Mobile & Wireless Health
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variability analysis of upper limb therapeutic movements using wearable inertial sensors is presented. Five healthy young adults were asked to perform a set of movements using two sensors placed on the upper arm and forearm. Reference data were obtained from three therapists. The goal of the study is to determine an intra and inter-group difference between a number of given movements performed by young people with respect to the movements of therapists. This effort is directed toward studying other groups characterized by motion impairments, and it is relevant to obtain a quantified measure of the quality of movement of a patient to follow his/her recovery. The sensor signals were processed by applying two approaches, time-domain features and similarity distance between each pair of signals. The data analysis was divided into classification and variability using features and distances calculated previously. The classification analysis was made to determine if the movements performed by the test subjects of both groups are distinguishable among them. The variability analysis was conducted to measure the similarity of the movements. According to the results, the flexion/extension movement had a high intra-group variability. In addition, meaningful information were provided in terms of change of velocity and rotational motions for each individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de los Reyes-Guzmán, A., Dimbwadyo-Terrer, I., Trincado-Alonso, F., Monasterio-Huelin, F., Torricelli, D., Gil-Agudo, A., Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: A review. Clin. Biomech. 29(7):719–7-27, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kostić, M. D., and Popović, M. D., The modified drawing test for assessment of arm movement quality. J. Autom. Control 21(1):49–53, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., et al., Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296(17):2095–2104, 2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gama, A. D., Chaves, T., Figueiredo, L., Teichrieb, V.: Guidance and movement correction based on therapeutics movements for motor rehabilitation support systems. In: 2012 14th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR), pp. 191–200 (2012)

  5. Houmanfar, R., Karg, M., Kulic, D., Movement analysis of rehabilitation exercises: Distance metrics for measuring patient progress. IEEE Systems Journal PP(99):1–12, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mancini, M., and Horak, F. B., The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur. J. Phys. Rehab. Med. 46(2):239–248, 2010.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guerra Filho, G. B.: A sensory-motor linguistic framework for human activity understanding. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD, USA (2007)

  8. Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., Van der Loos, M., Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 83(7):952–959, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kutner, N. G., Zhang, R., Butler, A. J., Wolf, S. L., Alberts, J. L., Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized clinical trial. Phys. Ther. 90(4):493–504, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lo, A. C., Guarino, P. D., Richards, L. G., Haselkorn, J. K., Wittenberg, G. F., Federman, D. G., Peduzzi, P., Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. New England J. Med. 362 (19):1772–1783, 2010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei, X. J., Tong, K. Y., Hu, X. L., The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer assessment, motor status scale, and the action research arm test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training. Int. J. Rehab. Res. 34(4):349–356, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Quintana, G. E., Sucar, L. E., Azcarate, G., Leder, R.: Qualification of arm gestures using hidden Markov models. In: 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, 2008. FG’08, pp. 1–6 (2008)

  13. van Andel, C. J., Wolterbeek, N., Doorenbosch, C. A., Veeger, D. H., Harlaar, J., Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. Gait Post. 27(1):120–127, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Butler, E. E., Ladd, A. L., Louie, S. A., LaMont, L. E., Wong, W., Rose, J., Three-dimensional kinematics of the upper limb during a reach and grasp cycle for children. Gait Post. 32(1):72–77, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaspers, E., Feys, H., Bruyninckx, H., Harlaar, J., Molenaers, G., Desloovere, K., Upper limb kinematics: Development and reliability of a clinical protocol for children. Gait Post. 33(2):279–285, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uswatte, G., Foo, W. L., Olmstead, H., Lopez, K., Holand, A., Simms, L. B., Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: An objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 86(7):1498–1501, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Pas, S. C., Verbunt, J. A., Breukelaar, D. E., van Woerden, R., Seelen, H. A., Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 92(9):1437–1442, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parnandi, A., Wade, E., Matari, M.: Motor function assessment using wearable inertial sensors. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 86–89 (2010)

  19. Zhang, M., Lange, B., Chang, C. Y., Sawchuk, A. A., Rizzo, A. A.: Beyond the standard clinical rating scales: Fine-grained assessment of post-stroke motor functionality using wearable inertial sensors. In: 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 6111–6115 (2012)

  20. Strohrmann, C., Labruyère, R., Gerber, C. N., van Hedel, H. J., Arnrich, B., Tröster, G., Monitoring motor capacity changes of children during rehabilitation using body-worn sensors. J. Neuroeng. Rehab. 10(83), 2013.

  21. Guneysu, A., Arnrich, B., Ersoy, C.: Children’s rehabilitation with humanoid robots and wearable inertial measurement units. In: 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 249–252 (2015)

  22. Muda, L., Begam, M., Elamvazuthi, I.: Voice recognition algorithms using mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) and dynamic time warping (DTW) techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:1003.4083 (2010)

  23. Keogh, E., and Ratanamahatana, C. A., Exact indexing of dynamic time warping. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 7(3): 358–386, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques: Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier (2011)

  25. Quinlan, J. R.: C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. Elsevier (2014)

  26. Agresti, A., and Kateri, M.: Categorical Data Analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 206–208 (2011)

  27. Brückner, H. P., Krüger, B., Blume, H., Reliable orientation estimation for mobile motion capturing in medical rehabilitation sessions based on inertial measurement units. Microelectron. J. 45(12):1603–1611, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wise, C.: Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy From Art to Evidence. F.A. Davis (2015)

  29. Zhang, Y., Qiu, M., Tsai, C., Hassan, M. M., Alamri, A., Health-CPS: Healthcare cyber-physical system assisted by cloud and big data. IEEE Syst. J. PP(99):1–8, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Hassan, M. M., Alamri, A., AIWAC: Affective interaction through wearable computing and cloud technology. IEEE Wire. Commun. 22(1):20–27, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology, CONACYT (grant number 271539/224405); and by the UBIHEALTH project, FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IRSES, European Commission (grant 316337).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irvin Hussein López-Nava.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mobile & Wireless Health.

Appendix: Time-domain features

Appendix: Time-domain features

The time-domain features are divided into two groups: central tendency (Eqs. 6 and 7) and dispersion (Eqs. 812), as described below.

In all the formulas detailed below: n is the size of the signal X, x is a value of X, th indicates the th-term of the ordered time serie X, and Q1 and Q3 are the lower and upper quartile of X.

  • Arithmetic mean (\(\bar {x}\)):

    $$ \bar{x}=\frac{x_{1}+x_{2}+...+x_{n}}{n} $$
    (6)
  • Median (f(x)):

    $$ f(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{llllllll} \left( \frac{n+1}{2}\right)^{th} term & \text{when}\, n\, \text{is odd}\\ \frac{\left( \frac{n}{2}\right)^{th} term+\left( \frac{n+1}{2}\right)^{th} term}{2} & \text{when}\, n\, \text{is even} \end{array}\right. $$
    (7)
  • Standard deviation (σ):

    $$ \sigma=\sqrt{\frac{1}{n}\left[\left( x_{1}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}+\left( x_{2}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}+...+\left( x_{n}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}\right]} $$
    (8)
  • Variance (σ 2):

    $$ \sigma^{2}=\frac{1}{n}\left[\left( x_{1}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}+\left( x_{2}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}+...+\left( x_{n}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}\right] $$
    (9)
  • Root mean square (rms):

    $$ rms=\sqrt{\frac{1}{n}\left( {x_{1}^{2}}+{x_{2}^{2}}+...+{x_{n}^{2}}\right)} $$
    (10)
  • Interquartile range (iqr):

    $$ iqr=Q_{3}-Q_{1} $$
    (11)
  • Mean absolute deviation (mad):

    $$ mad=\frac{1}{n}\left[\mid x_{1}-\bar{x} \mid +\mid x_{2}-\bar{x} \mid +...+\mid x_{n}-\bar{x} \mid \right] $$
    (12)
  • Minimum is the smallest value of the sample

  • Maximum is the largest value of the sample

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Nava, I.H., Arnrich, B., Muñoz-Meléndez, A. et al. Variability Analysis of Therapeutic Movements using Wearable Inertial Sensors. J Med Syst 41, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0645-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0645-8

Keywords

Navigation