Abstract
This paper reports the process by which a personalized cancer treatment system was built, following a user-centered approach. We give some background on personalized cancer treatment, the particular tumor chemosensitivity assay supported by the system, as well as some quality and legal issues related to such health systems. We describe how Contextual Design was applied when building the system. Contextual design is a user-centered design technique involving seven steps. We also provide some details about the system implementation. Finally, we explain how the Think-Aloud protocol and Heuristic Evaluation methods were used to evaluate the system and report its results. A qualitative assessment from the users perspective is also provided. Results from the heuristic evaluation indicate that only one of ten heuristics was missing from the system, while five were partially covered and four were fully covered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
1 The HCI expert states that there is no conflict of interest since he did not participate in the design of the system nor in its implementation.
References
Lippert, T., Ruoff, H.-J., Volm, M., Intrinsic and acquired drug resistance in Malignant tumors. the main reason for therapeutic failure. Arzneimittelforschung 58(6):261–264, 2008.
Kitano, H., Cancer as a robust system: implications for anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4(3):227–235, 2004. 03.
Lippert, T., Ruoff, H.-J., Volm, M., Intrinsic and acquired drug resistance in Malignant tumors. the main reason for therapeutic failure. Arzneimittelforschung 58(6):261–264, 2008.
Kurbacher, C. M., and Cree, I. A., Chemosensitivity testing using microplate adenosine triphosphate-based luminescence measurements. Methods Mol. Med. 110:101–120, 2005.
Doern, G., and Brecher, S., The clinical predictive value (or lack thereof) of the results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:S11–S14, 2011.
Potti, A., Dressman, H., Bild, A., Riedel, R., Chan, G., Sayer, R., Cragun, J., Cottrill, H., Kelley, M., Petersen, R., Harpole, D., Marks, J., Berchuck, A., Ginsburg, G., Febbo, P., Lancaster, J., Nevins, J., Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat. Med. 12:1294–1300, 2006.
Kolata, G.: How bright promise in cancer testing fell apart. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/08/health/research/08genes.html (2011)
Potti, A., Dressman, H. K., Bild, A., Riedel, R. F., Chan, G., Sayer, R., Cragun, J., Cottrill, H., Kelley, M. J., Petersen, R., Harpole, D., Marks, J., Berchuck, A., Ginsburg, G. S., Febbo, P., Lancaster, J., Nevins, J. R., Retraction: Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat. Med. 17(1):135–135, 2011.
Baggerly, K., and Coombes, K., Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology. Ann. Appl. Stat. 3(4):1309–1334 , 2009.
Potti, A., Dressman, H. K., Bild, A., Riedel, R. F., Chan, G., Sayer, R., Cragun, J., Cottrill, H., Kelley, M. J., Petersen, R., Harpole, D., Marks, J., Berchuck, A., Ginsburg, G. S., Febbo, P., Lancaster, J., Retraction, J. R. N., Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat. Med. 17(1):135–135, 2011.
Institute of Medicine, Statement on Quality of Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1998.
Carter, J. L, Coletti, R. J, Harris, R. P: Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods. BMJ, 350 (2015)
Dickinson, R., Hall, S., Sinclair, J., Bond, C., Murchie, P., Using technology to deliver cancer follow-up: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 14(1):1–16, 2014.
Melnikow, J., Fenton, J. J., Whitlock, E. P., Miglioretti, D. L., Weyrich, M. S., Thompson, J. H., Kunal, S., Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts A systematic review for the u.s. preventive services task forcesupplemental breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts. Ann. Intern. Med. 164(4):268–278, 2016.
Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Shinyi, W., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S., Shekelle, P., Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144(10):742–752, 2006.
Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.
Tseng, W.-T., Chiang, W.-F., Liu, S.-Y., Roan, J., Lin, C.-N., The application of data mining techniques to oral cancer prognosis. J. Med. Syst. 39(5):1–7, 2015.
Aytac Korkmaz, S., and Poyraz, M., A new method based for diagnosis of breast cancer cells from microscopic images Dwee—jht. J. Med. Syst. 38(9):1–9, 2014.
Chao, C.-M., Ya-Wen, Y., Cheng, B.-W., Kuo, Y.-L., Construction the model on the breast cancer survival analysis use support vector machine, logistic regression and decision tree. J. Med. Syst. 38(10):1–7, 2014.
Tsai, M.-H., Wang, H.-C., Lee, G.-W., Lin, Y.-C., Chiu, S.-H., A decision tree based classifier to analyze human ovarian cancer cdna microarray datasets. J. Med. Syst. 40(1):1–8, 2015.
Cai, K., Yang, R., Chen, H., Ning, H., Ma, A., Zhou, J., Huang, W., Shanxing, O., Simulation and visualization of liver cancer ablation focus in optical surgical navigation. J. Med. Syst. 40(1):1–7, 2015.
Tourassi, G., Yoon, H.-J., Songhua, X., A novel web informatics approach for automated surveillance of cancer mortality trends. J. Biomed. Inform. 61:110–118, 2016.
Defossez, G., Rollet, A., Dameron, O., Ingrand, P., Temporal representation of care trajectories of cancer patients using data from a regional information system: an application in breast cancer. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 14(1):1–15, 2014.
Jacko, J. A.: The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press (2012)
Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K., Contextual design. Interactions 6(1):32–42, 1999.
Yen, P.-Y., and Suzanne, B., A comparison of usability evaluation methods Heuristic evaluation versus end-user think-aloud protocol –an example from a web-based communication tool for nurse scheduling. AMIA Ann. Symp. Proc. 2009:714–718, 2009.
Jaspers, M. W. M., A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(5):340–353 , 2009.
Nielsen, J., and Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’90, pages 249–256, New York NY, USA, ACM (1990)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Research Center on Information and Communication Technologies (CITIC) and the Department of Computer and Information Science (ECCI) at the University of Costa Rica, under grant No. 834-B3-174. It was also partially supported by the Research Center on Tropical Diseases (CIET) and the Costa Rican Ministry of Science, Technology and Telecommunications. The HCI researchers that collaborated in this project were also supported by CITIC under grant No. 834-B4-159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Transactional Processing Systems
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinez, A., López, G., Bola nos, C. et al. Building a Personalized Cancer Treatment System. J Med Syst 41, 28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0678-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0678-z