Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-Category Classification of Magnetic Resonance Hearing Loss Images Based on Deep Autoencoder

  • Image & Signal Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Author Correction to this article was published on 03 January 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Hearing loss, a partial or total inability to hear, is known as hearing impairment. Untreated hearing loss can have a bad effect on normal social communication, and it can cause psychological problems in patients. Therefore, we design a three-category classification system to detect the specific category of hearing loss, which is beneficial to be treated in time for patients. Before the training and test stages, we use the technology of data augmentation to produce a balanced dataset. Then we use deep autoencoder neural network to classify the magnetic resonance brain images. In the stage of deep autoencoder, we use stacked sparse autoencoder to generate visual features, and softmax layer to classify the different brain images into three categories of hearing loss. Our method can obtain good experimental results. The overall accuracy of our method is 99.5%, and the time consuming is 0.078 s per brain image. Our proposed method based on stacked sparse autoencoder works well in classification of hearing loss images. The overall accuracy of our method is 4% higher than the best of state-of-the-art approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 03 January 2018

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The reference #27 in the reference list is incorrect in that the individual chapter should be cited instead of the whole book.

References

  1. Patel, N.S., Hunter, J.B., O'Connell, B.P., et al., Risk of progressive hearing loss in untreated superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope. 127(5):1181–1186, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurabi, A., Keithley, E.M., Housley, G.D., et al., Cellular mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss. Hear. Res. 349:129–137, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhaus, C., Lang-Roth, R., Zimmermann, U., et al., Extension of the clinical and molecular phenotype of DIAPH1-associated autosomal dominant hearing loss (DFNA1). Clin. Genet. 91(6):892–901, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Etminan, M., Westerberg, B.D., Kozak, F.K., et al., Risk of sensorineural hearing loss with macrolide antibiotics: A nested case-control study. Laryngoscope. 127(1):229–232, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brecht, E.J., Barsz, K., Gross, B., et al., Increasing GABA reverses age-related alterations in excitatory receptive fields and intensity coding of auditory midbrain neurons in aged mice. Neurobiol. Aging. 56:87–99, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shao, H., Jiang, H., Zhao, H., et al., A novel deep autoencoder feature learning method for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. Mech. Syst.Signal Process. 95:187–204, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, J., Detection of left-sided and right-sided hearing loss via fractional fourier transform. Entropy 18(5):Article ID: 194, 2016.

  8. Nayak, D.R., Detection of unilateral hearing loss by stationary wavelet entropy. CNS Neurol. Disord. - Drug Targets. 16(2):122–128, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y., and Chen, X.-Q, Sensorineural hearing loss detection via discrete wavelet transform and principal component analysis combined with generalized eigenvalue proximal support vector machine and Tikhonov regularization. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2016 doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4087-6

  10. Li, J., Texture analysis method based on fractional Fourier entropy and fitness-scaling adaptive genetic algorithm for detecting left-sided and right-sided sensorineural hearing loss. Fundam. Inf. 151(1–4):505–521, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, H. Hearing loss detection in medical multimedia data by discrete wavelet packet entropy and single-hidden layer neural network trained by adaptive learning-rate back propagation. In 14th International Symposium on Neural Networks (ISNN). Sapporo, Japan: Springer. pp 541–549, 2017.

  12. Gao, X., Sun, Q., and Xu, H., Multiple-rank supervised canonical correlation analysis for feature extraction, fusion and recognition. Expert Syst. Appl. 84:171–185, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kovrlija, R., and Rondeau-Mouro, C., Multi-scale NMR and MRI approaches to characterize starchy products. Food Chem. 236:2–14, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cortés, J.C., Navarro-Quiles, A., Romero, J.V., et al., Randomizing the parameters of a Markov chain to model the stroke disease: A technical generalization of established computational methodologies towards improving real applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 324:225–240, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan, Z., Bi, D., He, L., et al., Low-level structure feature extraction for image processing via stacked sparse denoising autoencoder. Neurocomputing. 243:12–20, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrei, N., Accelerated adaptive Perry conjugate gradient algorithms based on the self-scaling memoryless BFGS update. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 325:149–164, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Le, M. H., Chen, J., Wang, L., et al., Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI based on multimodal convolutional neural networks. Phys. Med. Biol. 62(16):6497–6514, 2017.

  18. March, W.B., and Biros, G., Far-field compression for fast kernel summation methods in high dimensions. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 43(1):39–75, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi, H., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y., Context-dependent word representation for neural machine translation. Comput. Speech Lang. 45:149–160, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sankaran, A., Vatsa, M., Singh, R., et al., Group sparse autoencoder. Image Vis. Comput. 60:64–74, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghosh, A.K., and Chakraborty, A., Use of EM algorithm for data reduction under sparsity assumption. Comput. Stat. 32(2):387–407, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, L., Cheng, D., Tian, F., et al., Active contour driven by multi-scale local binary fitting and Kullback-Leibler divergence for image segmentation. Multimed. Tools Appl. 76(7):10149–10168, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, B., Wang, Q., Zhang, J., et al., Stable prediction in high-dimensional linear models. Stat. Comput. 27(5):1401–1412, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y.B., You, Z.H., Li, X., et al., Predicting protein-protein interactions from protein sequences by a stacked sparse autoencoder deep neural network. Mol. Biosyst. 13(7):1336–1344, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hong, C., Yu, J., Jane, Y., et al., Three-dimensional image-based human pose recovery with hypergraph regularized autoencoders. Multimed. Tools Appl. 76(8):10919–10937, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng, S., Gou, J., and Deng, L., An antinoise sparse representation method for robust face recognition via joint l 1 and l 2 regularization. Expert Syst. Appl. 82:1–9, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Iliadis, L., and Maglogiannis I. (Eds.), Scaled conjugate gradient based adaptive ANN control for SVM-DTC inductionmotor drive. Artif. Intell. Appl. Innov. 384–395, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44944-933.

  28. Gholami, A., Honarvar, F., and Moghaddam, H.A., Modeling the ultrasonic testing echoes by a combination of particle swarm optimization and Levenberg–Marquardt algorithms. Meas. Sci. Technol. 28(6):065001, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, N., Ding, S., and Zhang, J., Multi layer ELM-RBF for multi-label learning. Appl. Soft Comput. 43:535–545, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, L.N., Improved image filter based on SPCNN. Sci. China Ser. F-Inf. Sci. 51(12):2115–2125, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu, L., Optimal multi-level thresholding based on maximum Tsallis entropy via an artificial bee Colony approach. Entropy. 13(4):841–859, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (61602250), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20150983, BK20150982).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ming Yang or Shui-Hua Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approve

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest with regards to the submission of this paper.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image & Signal Processing.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0884-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, W., Yang, M. & Wang, SH. Three-Category Classification of Magnetic Resonance Hearing Loss Images Based on Deep Autoencoder. J Med Syst 41, 165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0814-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0814-4

Keywords

Navigation