Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Provider Access to Legacy Electronic Anesthesia Records Following Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many hospitals are in the process of replacing their legacy anesthesia information management system (AIMS) with an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system, within which the AIMS is integrated. Using the legacy AIMS security access log table, we studied the extent to which anesthesia providers were accessing historical anesthesia records (January 2006 – March 2017) following implementation of an EHR (April 2017). Statistical analysis was by segmented regression. At the time of implementation of the EHR, in 44.8% (SE = 0.3%) of cases, there was a prior anesthetic record for the patient that had been documented in the legacy AIMS. Following EHR implementation, the mean number of preoperative clinical views of all prior anesthetic records divided by the total number of cases performed decreased to 2.3% (0.3%) from the baseline of 25.1% (0.8%). The estimated ratio of the 2 means was 0.18 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.31, P < 0.00001). For views of unique records, the decrease was to 2.2% (0.3%) from the baseline of 18.3% (0.5%). The estimated ratio was 0.23 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.35, P < 0.00001). These results show that, following conversion to an integrated EHR, providing access to historical anesthesia records by maintaining the legacy AIMS is not an effective strategy to promote review of such records as part of the preoperative evaluation process. Because such records provide important information for many patients, providing linked access to such records within the EHR as part of the patient encounter may be a more effective approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Springman, S. R., Integration of the enterprise electronic health record and anesthesia information management systems. Anesthesiol. Clin. 29:455–483, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ehrenfeld, J. M., and Rehman, M. A., Anesthesia information management systems: a review of functionality and installation considerations. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 25:71–79, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edition. New York, NY: Free of Glencoe, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stol, I. S., Ehrenfeld, J. M., and Epstein, R. H., Technology diffusion of anesthesia information management systems into academic anesthesia departments in the United States. Anesth. Analg. 118:644–650, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Norton, J. A., and Bass, F. M., A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products. Manag. Sci. 33:1069–1086, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein, R. H., and Dexter, F., Database Quality and Access Issues Relevant to Research Using Anesthesia Information Management System Data. Anesth. Analg. 127(1):105–114, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wanderer, J. P., Gruss, C. L., and Ehrenfeld, J. M., Using visual Analytics to determine the utilization of preoperative anesthesia assessments. Appl. Clin. Inform. 6:629–637, 2015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dexter, F., Marcon, E., Epstein, R. H., and Ledolter, J., Validation of statistical methods to compare cancellation rates on the day of surgery. Anesth. Analg. 101:465–473, 2005. ​Erratum in Anesth. Analg. 114: 693, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dexter, F., Epstein, R. H., Marcon, E., and Ledolter, J., Estimating the incidence of prolonged turnover times and delays by time of day. Anesthesiology 102:1242–1248, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dexter, F., Witkowski, T. A., and Epstein, R. H., Forecasting preanesthesia clinic appointment duration from the electronic medical record medication list. Anesth. Analg. 114:670–673, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wax, D. B., McCormick, P. J., Joseph, T. T., and Levin, M. A., An automated critical event screening and notification system to facilitate preanesthesia record review. Anesth. Analg. 126:606–610, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Richard H. Epstein helped design the study, perform the statistical analyses, and write the manuscript. Franklin Dexter helped perform the statistical analyses and write the manuscript. Eric S. Schwenk secured approval from the Institutional Review Board and helped write the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard H. Epstein.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Thomas Jefferson University institutional review board with waiver of patient consent on November 26, 2018 (Control #18D.053).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 433 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 76 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Epstein, R.H., Dexter, F. & Schwenk, E.S. Provider Access to Legacy Electronic Anesthesia Records Following Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System. J Med Syst 43, 105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1232-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1232-6

Keywords

Navigation