Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combination of Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography and Fundus Images for Glaucoma Screening

  • Image & Signal Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glaucoma is an eye disease that damages the optic nerve and can lead to irreversible loss of peripheral vision gradually and even blindness without treatment. Thus, diagnosing glaucoma in the early stage is essential for treatment. In this paper, an automatic method for early glaucoma screening is proposed. The proposed method combines structural parameters and textural features extracted from enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) images and fundus images. The method first segments anterior the lamina cribrosa surface (ALCS) based on region-aware strategy and residual U-Net and then extracts structural features of the lamina cribrosa, such as lamina cribrosa depth and deformation of lamina cribrosa. In fundus images, scanning lines based on disc center and brightness reduction are used for optic disc segmentation and brightness compensation is utilized for segmenting the optic cup. Afterward, the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and textural features are extracted from fundus images. Hybrid features are used for training and classification to screen glaucoma by gcForest in the early stage. The proposed method has given exceptional results with 96.88% accuracy and 91.67% sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bourne, R. R., Stevens, G. A., White, R. A. et al., Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health. 1(6):e339–e349, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70113-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens, G. A., White, R. A., Flaxman, S. R. et al., Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: Magnitude and temporal trends, 1990-2010. Ophthalmology. 120(12):2377–2384, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tham, Y. C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y. et al., Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 121(11):2081, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quigley, H. A., and Broman, A. T., The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British journal of ophthalmology. 90(3):262–267, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Z. L., Mo, Y. F., Ouyang, P. B. et al., Retinal vessel optical coherence tomography images for Anemia screening. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing., 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1927-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Z. L., Li, D. B., Shen, H. L. et al., Automated retinal layer segmentation in OCT images of age-related macular degeneration. IET Image Processing., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.5304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tian, H., Li, L., and Song, F., Study on the deformations of the lamina cribrosa during glaucoma. Acta Biomaterialia. 55:340–348, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chien, J. L., Ghassibi, M. P., Mahadeshwar, P. et al., A novel method for assessing Lamina Cribrosa structure ex vivo using anterior segment enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Journal of Glaucoma. 26(7):626–632, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiumehr, S., Park, S. C., Dorairaj, S. et al., In vivo evaluation of focal lamina cribrosa defects in glaucoma. Archives of ophthalmology. 130(5):552–559, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopthalmol.2011.1309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park, H. Y., and Park, C. K., Diagnostic capability of lamina cribrosa thickness by enhanced depth imaging and factors affecting thickness in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 120(4):745–752, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, Y. W., Kim, D. W., Jeoung, J. W. et al., Peripheral lamina cribrosa depth in primary open-angle glaucoma: A swept-source optical coherence tomography study of lamina cribrosa. Eye. 29(10):1368–1374, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sawada, Y., Hangai, M., Murata, K. et al., Lamina Cribrosa depth variation measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography within and between four glaucomatous optic disc phenotypes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(10):5777–5784, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, Z. L., Peng, P., Zou, B. J. et al., Automatic anterior Lamina Cribrosa surface depth measurement based on active contour and energy constraint. Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 32(6):1214–1221, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-017-1795-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Belghith, A., Bowd, C., Medeiros, F. A., et al., Automated segmentation of anterior lamina cribrosa surface: How the lamina cribrosa responds to intraocular pressure change in glaucoma eyes? 2015 12th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2015.7163854.

  15. Haleem, M. S., Han, L., Hemert, J. et al., A novel adaptive deformable model for automated optic disc and cup segmentation to aid Glaucoma diagnosis. Journal of Medical Systems. 42(20), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0859-4.

  16. Noronha, K. P., Acharya, U., Nayak, K. P. et al., Automated classification of glaucoma stages using higher order cumulant features. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 10:174–183, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2013.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khalil, T., Akram, M. U., Khalid, S. et al., Improved automated detection of glaucoma from fundus image using hybrid structural and textural features. IET Image Processing. 11(9):693–700, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Issac, A., Sarathi, M. P., and Dutta, M. K., An adaptive threshold based image processing technique for improved glaucoma detection and classification. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 122(2):229–244, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maheshwari, S., Pachori, R. B., and Acharya, U. R., Automated screening of glaucoma using empirical wavelet transform and correntropy features extracted from fundus images. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 21(3):803–813, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2016.2544961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Soltani, A., Battikh, T., Jabri, I. et al., A new expert system based on fuzzy logic and image processing algorithms for early glaucoma screening. Biomedical Signal Processing & Control. 40:366–377, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2017.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soorya, M., Issac, A., and Dutta, M. K., An automated and robust image processing algorithm for glaucoma screening from fundus images using novel blood vessel tracking and bend point detection. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 110:52–70, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raghavendra, U., Fujita, H., Bhandary, S. V. et al., Deep convolution neural network for accurate diagnosis of Glaucoma using digital fundus images. Information Sciences. 441:41–49, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.01.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niwas, S. I., Lin, W., Bai, X. et al., Automated anterior segment OCT image analysis for angle closure Glaucoma mechanisms classification. Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine. 130:65–75, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gopinath, K., Sivaswamy, J., Mansoori, T., Automatic glaucoma assessment from angio-OCT images. 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2016.7493242.

  25. Zhou, Z.H., Feng, J., Deep Forest: Towards An Alternative to Deep Neural Networks. 2017 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2017. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/497.

  26. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T., U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. 2015 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Drozdzal, M., Vorontsov, E., Chartrand, G., et al., The importance of skip connections in biomedical image segmentation. 2016 2nd Workshop on Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications (DLMIA), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_19.

    Google Scholar 

  28. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., et al., Deep residual learning for image recognition. 2016 29th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.

  29. Mari, J. M., Strouthidis, N. G., Park, S. C. et al., Enhancement of lamina cribrosa visibility in optical coherence tomography images using adaptive compensation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 54(3):2238–2247, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-11327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Girard, M. J., Tun, T. A., Husain, R. et al., Lamina cribrosa visibility using optical coherence tomography: Comparison of devices and effects of image enhancement techniques. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 56(2):865–874, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G., ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. 2012 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., and Harwood, D., A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Pattern Recognition. 29(1):51–59, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(95)00067-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rhodes, L. A., Huisingh, C. E., Quinn, A. E. et al., Comparison of Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim width among those with Normal ocular health by race. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 174:113–118, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.10.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nannini, D. R., Kim, H., Fan, F. et al., Genetic risk score is associated with vertical cup-to-disc ratio and improves prediction of primary open-angle Glaucoma in Latinos. Ophthalmology. 125(6):815–821, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Eleyan, A., Demirel, H., Co-occurrence based statistical approach for face recognition. 2009 24th IEEE International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (ISCIS), 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCIS.2009.5291895.

  36. Xian, G. M., An identification method of malignant and benign liver tumors from ultrasonography based on GLCM texture features and fuzzy SVM. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(10):6737–6741, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gunduz, A., and Principe, J. C., Correntropy as a novel measure for nonlinearity tests. Signal Processing. 89(1):14–23, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gilles, J., Empirical wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 61(16):3999–4010, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2265222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61672542.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China

    Zailiang Chen, Xianxian Zheng, Hailan Shen, Ziyang Zeng & Qing Liu

  2. The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China

    Zhuo Li

Authors
  1. Zailiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xianxian Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hailan Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ziyang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhuo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hailan Shen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image & Signal Processing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Zheng, X., Shen, H. et al. Combination of Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography and Fundus Images for Glaucoma Screening. J Med Syst 43, 163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1303-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1303-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation