Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Use of eHealth Applications in Hong Kong: Results of a Random-Digit Dialing Survey

  • Mobile & Wireless Health
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

eHealth has become popular worldwide, and it is transforming health care. However, studies examining  the use of eHealth applications in the Chinese population are scarce. The study reports on the characteristics of eHealth applications in Hong Kong information and communication technology (ICT) users, their attitudes towards eHealth, and their reasons for not using eHealth applications. A cross-sectional random-digit dialing survey targeting adults using ICT was conducted in Hong Kong to elicit information on respondents’ use of and attitudes towards eHealth. A total of 495 ICT users completed the survey, of whom 353 (71.3%) were eHealth users. A smartphone was the most frequent way of performing eHealth activities (71.7%). The most prevalent eHealth activity was reading about health/illness (86.4%), with 93.5% indicating that eHealth applications improved their understanding of health care issues. People with less education were less likely to use eHealth applications. Non-eHealth users indicated that the main reasons for not using eHealth applications were lack of interest in health information (49.3%) and lack of confidence in the reliability of online information (45.1%). Quality monitoring of health information available on ICTs and tailoring the design and readability are recommended to meet the needs of those seeking health resources and to promote eHealth. Evidence from the study demonstrates the potential of eHealth to improve the dissemination of health information in Hong Kong, and it provides a basis for improving eHealth integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global difusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable. Report of the third global survey on eHealth. Geneva: 2016.

  2. European Commission. eHealth Action Plan 2012–2020 - Innovative healthcare for the 21st century 2012. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/ehealth/docs/com_2012_736_en.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018

  3. Iverson, S. A., Howard, K. B., and Penney, B. K., Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: a survey-based study and review. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 108(12):699–711, 2008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Free, C., Phillips, G., Watson, L., Galli, L., Felix, L., and Petal, E., The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 10(1):e1001363, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McDermott, M., and While, A., Maximizing the healthcare environment: a systematic review exploring the potential of computer technology to promote self-management of chronic illness in healthcare settings. Patient Education and Counseling 1:13–22, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, L., Wagner, T., Singer, S., and Bundorf, M., Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 289(18):2400–2406, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson, N., Saperstein, S., and Pleis, J., Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. Journal of Medical Internet Research 11(1):e4, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kontos, E., Blake, K. D., Chou, W. Y., and Prestin, A., Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16(7), 2014. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Amante, D. J., Hogan, T. P., Pagoto, S. L., English, T. M., and Lapane, K. L., Access to Care and Use of the Internet to Search for Health Information: Results From the US National Health Interview Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 17(4):e106, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Andreassen, H., Bujnowska-Fedak, M., Chronaki, C., Dumitru, R., Pudule, I., Santana, S. et al., European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 7:53, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Koo, M., Lu, M. C., and Lin, S. C., Predictors of Internet use for health information among male and female Internet users: Findings from the 2009 Taiwan National Health Interview Survey. Int J Med Inform 94:155–163. Epub 2016/08/31, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, J. H. Y., Adams, I. F., Pasick, R. J., Gomez, S. L., Allen, L., Ma, G. X. et al., Perceptions, Expectations, and Attitudes about Communication with Physicians among Chinese American and non-Hispanic White Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 21(12):3315–3325, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1902-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Office of the Communications Authority (2017) Information technology usage and penetration. Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. https://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11302622017XXXXB0100.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2018.

  14. Norman, C., and Skinner, H., eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. Journal of Medical Internet Research 8(4):e27, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynn, M. R., Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research 35(6):382–385, 1986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Polit, D. F., and Beck, C. T., The Content Validity Index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critiques and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health 29:489–497, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sousa, V. D., and Rojjanasrirat, W., Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17:268–274, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, Y. Y., Online health information seeking behavior in Hong Kong: an exploratory study. Journal of Medical Systems 34(2):147–153, 2010 Epub 2010/05/04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, P., Xiao, L., Gou, Z., Xiang, L., Zhang, X., and Feng, P., Telehealth attitudes and use among medical professionals, medical students and patients in China: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Medical Informatics 108:13–21, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kakihara M. Grasping a Global View of Smartphone Diffusion: An Analysis from a Global Smartphone Study. 13th International Conference on Mobile Business 2014.

  21. Godara B, Nikore V. What are health informatics, eHealth and mHealth? In: Celi LAG, Fraser HSF, Nikore V, Osorio JS, Paik K, editors. Global Health Informatics: Principles of EHealth and MHealth to Improve Quality of Care. United States: MIT Press; 2017.

  22. WHO Global Observatory for eHealth, mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies: second global survey on eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boulos, M. N. K., Wheeler, S., Tavares, C., and Jones, R., How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 10:24, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fiksdal, A. S., Kumbamu, A., Jadhav, A. S., Cocos, C., Nelsen, L. A., Pathak, J. et al., Evaluating the Process of Online Health Information Searching: A Qualitative Approach to Exploring Consumer Perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16(10):e224, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tonsaker, T., Bartlett, G., and Trpkov, C., Health information on the Internet Gold mine or minefield? Canadian Family Physician 60(5):407–408, 2014.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hardiker, N. R., and Grant, M. J., Factors that influence public engagement with eHealth: A literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80(1):1–12. Epub 2010/11/30, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chu, T. W. J., Wang, P. M., Shen, C., Viswanath, K., Lam, H. T., and Chan, C. S. S., How, When and Why People Seek Health Information Online: Qualitative Study in Hong Kong. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 6(2):e24, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.7000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Policy 21 for data collection assistance and all participants who took part in the study.

Funding

This work was funded by the Small Project Funding, The University of Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation and design of the study: DSTC, CKLO, MKPS, KH, AT. Data collection and analysis: DSTC, CKLO, MKPS. Preparation of the manuscript: DSTC, CKLO, MKPS, KH, AT. Reviewing of the manuscript: DSTC, CKLO, MKPS, KH, AT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calvin Kalun Or.

Ethics declarations

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mobile & Wireless Health

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheung, D.S.T., Or, C., So, M.K.P. et al. The Use of eHealth Applications in Hong Kong: Results of a Random-Digit Dialing Survey. J Med Syst 43, 293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1422-2

Keywords

Navigation