Abstract
Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) has grown and continues to expand as a proportion of all anesthesia practice in the United States [1, 2]. While many management processes have been adapted for NORA from the traditional operating room, it is still unclear what scheduling paradigm will maximize efficiency of resource utilization in this arena. In this study, we investigate the impact of tactical a shift from a shared group to individual, provider-specific block allocations for available anesthesia time in an endoscopy suite for adult patients undergoing elective endoscopy procedures at an academic hospital. Using a retrospective and prospective analysis, we measured elective time-in-block; elective time out-of-block; under-utilized (opportunity and non-opportunity unused) time; over-utilized time; and case tardiness to determine operational efficiency and clinical productivity. Over the study period, the monthly caseload remained constant. Elective time in block increased by 156% (p < 0.0001) and elective time out of block decreased by 38% (p < 0.0001). Opportunity unused time decreased by 28% (p < 0.0001) and productivity increased by 51% (p < 0.0001). Neither over-utilized time nor case tardiness showed a significant change after the intervention. Despite the evidence base supporting traditional approaches to anesthesia block allocation involving group block allocation and non-sequential case scheduling, we have demonstrated an advantage to individual block allocation in a GI endoscopy setting. This sequential case scheduling highlights how tactical decisions in NORA environments may require a rethinking of many practices that anesthesiologists have brought with them from the traditional OR. Using these efficiency and productivity metrics, further adjustments to scheduling practices should be investigated, and connecting these metrics to other systems outcomes, such as financial productivity, is an important next step as NORA services expand into the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nagrebetsky, A., Gabriel, R. A., Dutton, R. P., and Urman, R. D., Growth of nonoperating room anesthesia care in the United States: A contemporary trends analysis. Anesth Analg 124(4):1261–1267, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001734.
Wong, T., Tsai, M. H., and Urman, R. D., The expansion of non-operating room anesthesia services. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag 9(October):39–42, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2017.11.008.
Al-Awabdy, B., and Wilcox, C. M., Use of anesthesia on the rise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5(1):1–5, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.1.
Bhavani, S., Non–Operating Room Anesthesia in the Endoscopy Unit. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 26(3):471–483, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2016.02.007.
Tsai, M. H., Cipri, L. A., O’Donnell, S. E., Matthew Fisher, J., and Andritsos, D. A., Scheduling non-operating room anesthesia cases in endoscopy: Using the sandbox analogy. J Clin Anesth 40:1–6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.03.010.
Macario, A., Implementing operating room management science: From the bench to the scheduling office. Eur J Anaesthesiol 31(7):355–360, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000026.
Dexter, F., Macario, A., and Cowen, D. S., Staffing and case scheduling for anesthesia in geographically dispersed locations outside of operating rooms. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19(4):453–458, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aco.0000236149.90988.7f.
Hudson, M. E., and Lebovitz, E. E., Measuring Clinical Productivity. Anesthesiol Clin 36(2):143–160, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2018.01.001.
Dexter, F., Xiao, Y., Dow, A. J., Strader, M. M., Ho, D., and Wachtel, R. E., Coordination of appointments for anesthesia care outside of operating rooms using an enterprise-wide scheduling system. Anesth Analg 105(6):1701–1710, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000287686.23187.3f.
Sarraf, E., Breidenstein, M. W., Carlson, R. E., O’Donnell, S. E., and Tsai, M. H., Nonoperating room anesthesia tardiness. Anesth Analg Prac 11(10):285–287, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000814.
Van Houdenhoven, M., Van Oostrum, J. M., Hans, E. W., Wullink, G., and Kazemier, G., Improving operating room efficiency by applying bin-packing and portfolio techniques to surgical case scheduling. Anesth Analg 105(3):707–714, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000277492.90805.0f.
Shi, P., Dexter, F., and Epstein, R. H., Comparing policies for case scheduling within 1 day of surgery by Markov chain models. Anesth Analg 122(2):526–538, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001074.
Carey, R. G., Constructing powerful control charts. J Ambul Care Manage 25(4):64–70, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004479-200210000-00010.
Carey, R. G., How do you know that your care is improving? Part I: Basic concepts in statistical thinking. J Ambul Care Manage 25(1):80–87, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004479-200201000-00011.
Carey RG. How Do You Know That Your Care Is Improving? Part II: Using Control Charts To Learn from Your Data. J Ambul Care Manage. 2002;25(1): 80-87. papers2://publication/uuid/69EEDE90-F29F-41D2-89BA-04DE346B35BA.
Dexter, F., and Wachtel, R. E., Scheduling for anesthesia at geographic locations remote from the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 27(4):426–430, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000085.
Perrow, C., Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies-Updated edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
Al-Mubarak F, Khumawala, BM, Canel, C. Focused cellular manufacturing: an alternative to cellular manufacturing. Int J Operations Production Manage 2003; 23(3): 277-299. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01443
Rathmell, J. P., and Sandberg, W. S., Anesthesiologists and health care redesign: Time to team up with the experts. Anesthesiology 125(4):618–621, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001277.
Wu, A., Sanford, J. A., Tsai, M. H., O’Donnell, S. E., Tran, B. K., and Urman, R. D., Analysis to establish differences in efficiency metrics between operating room and non-operating room anesthesia cases. J Med Syst 1(8):4–9, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0765-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mitchell H. Tsai, MD, MMM, helped design the study, collect the data, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Michael A. Hall, MD, helped design the study, collect the data, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Melanie S. Cardinal, MSN, CGRN, helped design the study, conduct the study, collect the data, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Max W. Breidenstein helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Michael J. Abajian, MD, MPH, helped design the study, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Richard S. Zubarik, MD, helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Mitchell H. Tsai, MD, MMM, declares no conflict of interest. Michael A. Hall, MD declares no conflict of interest. Melanie S. Cardinal, MSN, CGRN, declares no conflict of interest. Max W. Breidenstein declares no conflict of interest. Michael J. Abajian, MD, MPH, declares no conflict of interest. Richard S. Zubarik, MD, declares no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Previous Presentation:
Hall MA, Cardinal MS, Breidenstein MW, Abajian MJ, Zubarik RS, Tsai MH. Single provider block time improves utilization and productivity in the endoscopy suite. Digestive Disease Week, San Diego, CA, May 2019.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsai, M.H., Hall, M.A., Cardinal, M.S. et al. Changing Anesthesia Block Allocations Improves Endoscopy Suite Efficiency. J Med Syst 44, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1451-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1451-x