Skip to main content
Log in

An Evaluation of the Hybrid Model for Predicting Surgery Duration

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The degree of accuracy in surgery duration estimation directly impacts on the quality of planned surgical lists. Model selection for the prediction of surgery duration requires technical expertise and significant time and effort. The result is often a collection of viable models, the performance of which varies across different strata of the surgical population. This paper proposes a prediction framework to be used after a comprehensive model selection process has been completed for surgery duration prediction. The framework produces a partition of the surgical cases and a “hybrid model” that allocates different predictors from the collection of viable models to different parts of the surgical population. The intention is a flexible prediction process that can reassign models and adapt as surgical processes change. The framework is tested via a simulation study, and its utility is demonstrated by predicting surgery durations for Ear, Nose and Throat surgeries in a New Zealand hospital. The results indicate that the hybrid model is effective, performing better than standard model selection in two of the three simulation studies, and marginally worse when the selected model was the true underlying process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Graue, R. M.: Prediction and optimization techniques to streamline surgical scheduling, Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology United States, 2013

  2. Devi, S. P., Rao, K. S., and Sangeetha, S. S., Prediction of surgery times and scheduling of operation theaters in optholmology department. J. Med. Sys. 36(2):415–430, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9486-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dexter, F., Epstein, R. H., Bayman, E. O., and Ledolter, J., Estimating surgical case durations and making comparisons among facilities: identifying facilities with lower anesthesia professional fees. Anesth. Analg. 116 (5):1103–1115, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828b3813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. ShahabiKargar, Z., Khanna, S., Good, N., Sattar, A., Lind, J., and O’Dwyer, J.: Predicting procedure duration to improve scheduling of elective surgery. In: Pham, D.-N., and Park, S.-B. (Eds.) PRICAI 2014: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-13560-1, 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13560-1_86, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hosseini, N., Sir, M. Y., Jankowski, C. J., and Pasupathy, K.: Surgical duration estimation via data mining and predictive modeling: a case study, AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 640–648, 2015

  6. Edelman, E. R., van Kuijk, S. M. J., Hamaekers, A. E. W., de Korte, M. J. M., van Merode, G. G., and Buhre, W. F. F. A., Improving the prediction of total surgical procedure time using linear regression modeling. Frontiers in Medicine 4:85, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00085.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. ShahabiKargar, Z., Khanna, S., Sattar, A., and Lind, J.: Improved prediction of procedure duration for elective surgery. In: Ryan, A., Schaper, L. K., and Whetton, S. (Eds.) Integrating and Connecting Care, vol. 239 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, IOS Press Ebooks, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-783-2-133, 2017.

  8. Green, S. B., How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behav. Res. 26(3): 499–510, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrell, F, Regression modeling strategies. 1 ed. New York: Springer, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt, F. L., The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 31(3):699–714, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447103100310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Austin, P. C., and Steyerberg, E. W., The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 68(6):627–636, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen, B. E., and Racine, J. S., Jackknife model averaging. J. Econom. 167(1):38–46, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.06.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolpert, D. H., Stacked generalization. Neural Netw. 5(2):241–259, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Allen, D. M., The relationship between variable selection and data augmentation and a method for prediction. Technometrics 16:125–127, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seber, G. A. F., and Lee, A. J., Linear regression analysis. 2 ed. New York: Wiley, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Khanmohammadi, N., Rezaie, H., Montaseri, M., and Behmanesh, J., The application of multiple linear regression method in reference evapotranspiration trend calculation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 32(3):661–673, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1378-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Theobald, R., and Freeman, S., Is it the intervention or the students? Using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research. CBE Life Sciences Education 13(1):41–48, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-07-0136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. R Core Team, R.: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/, 2018

  19. Alpaydin, E., Introduction to machine learning. 2 ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2010. ISBN 9780262012430.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. Soh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soh, K.W., Walker, C., O’Sullivan, M. et al. An Evaluation of the Hybrid Model for Predicting Surgery Duration. J Med Syst 44, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1501-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1501-4

Keywords

Navigation