Abstract
Excessive amounts of resources in healthcare are wasted due to duplicated or unnecessary health screenings, especially in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP). Research shows that two-thirds of people will present with LBP at some point throughout their lifetime, but 20–50% of high-tech imaging procedures fail to provide information that improves the patient’s condition, representing unnecessary services. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existence of unnecessary imaging for low back pain throughout healthcare systems in Nebraska based on what was documented in the electronic health record. This study was a retrospective electronic health record analysis of a limited data set focused on procedures related to imaging for LBP extracted from Nebraska Health Information Exchange (HIE) managed by CyncHealth. The sample included 937 patient records with a diagnosis of LBP who received imaging in the state of Nebraska and whose health record was recorded in the Nebraska HIE. To determine necessity, records were categorized in three areas including necessary imaging, likely wasteful imaging, or wasteful imaging based on the criteria from the “First, Do No Harm” study conducted by the Washington Health Alliance. Results revealed a total of 51% of low back pain imaging considered wasteful, 35% likely wasteful, and 14% necessary. Based on these results, further research is warranted to determine specific demographics related to necessary, likely wasteful, and wasteful imaging and the purpose for performing these expensive imaging procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berwick, D, Hackbarth, AD. Eliminating waste in U. S. health care. The Journal of American Medical Association 2018; 307:1513–1516. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.362
Choi, S, Hoban, C, Michelson, J, Vichare, S. (2019). Special report: It’s time to drive impact. Oliver Wyman Health Innovation Journal 2019; 3. Retrieved from https://health.oliverwyman.com/2019/09/special-report--it-s-time-to-drive-impact.html
Washington Health Alliance. First, do no harm: calculating health care waste in Washington State 2018: Retrieved from https://wahealthalliance.org
Burke, L, Ryan, A. The complex relationship between cost and quality in US health care. Virtual Mentor 2014; 16:124-130. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.02.pfor1-1402
Kruse, C, Kristof, C, Jones, B, Mitchell, E, Martinez, A. Barriers to electronic health record adoption: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Systems 2016; 40(12): 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9
Campanella, P, Lovato, E, Marone, C, Fallacara, L, Mancuso, A, Ricciardi, W, Specchia, M. The impact of electronic health care records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The European Journal of Public Health 2016; 26(1): 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv122
King, J, Patel, V, Jamoom, E, Furukawa, M. Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: National findings. Health Service Research 2013; 49(1): 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12135d
Bailey, J.E., Pope, R.A., Elliott, E.C., Wan, J.Y., Waters, T.M. and Frisse, M.E., 2013. Health information exchange reduces repeated diagnostic imaging for back pain. Annals of emergency medicine, 62(1), pp.16-24.
Lammers, E. J., Adler-Milstein, J., & Kocher, K. E. (2014). Does health information exchange reduce redundant imaging? Evidence from emergency departments. Medical care, 227–234.
Sadoughi, F., Nasiri, S. and Ahmadi, H., 2018. The impact of health information exchange on healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 161, pp.209-232.
Yayac, M., Toci, G.R., Smith, E.B., Star, A.M., Parvizi, J. and Saxena, A., 2021. The Frequency, Reasoning, and Impact of Repeated Radiographs at the Initial Orthopedic Arthroplasty Visit. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 36(11), pp.3641-3645.
Yuan, Y., Price, M., Schmidt, D.F., Ward, M., Nebeker, J. and Pizer, S., 2022. Integrated Health Record Viewers and Reduction in Duplicate Medical Imaging: Retrospective Observational Analysis. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(5), p.e32168.
American Academy of Family Physicians. Imaging for low back pain. No date. Retrieved from https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/cw-back-pain.htm
Hendee, W, Becker, G, Borgstede, J, Bosma, J, Casarella, W, Erickson, B, et al. Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiological society of North America 2010; 257(1): 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100063
Wáng, Y, Wu, A, Ruiz-Santiago, F, Nogueira-Barbosa, M. Informed appropriate imaging for low back pain management: A narrative review. Journal of orthopaedic translation 2018; 15: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2018.07.009
Chou, R, Qaseem, A, Owens, D, Shekelle, P. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011; 154(3): 181–189. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00008
Sears, E, Caverly, T, & Kullgren, J. Clincians’ perceptions of barriers to avoiding inappropriate imaging for low back pain- knowing is not enough. Journal of the American Medical Association 2016; 176(12): 1866-1868. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6364
Hooten, W, Cohen, S. Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: a clinically focused review for primary care specialists. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2015; 90(12): 1699–1718. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.009
Downie, A, Hancock, M, Jenkins, H, Buchbinder, R, Harris, I, Underwood, M, et, al. How common is imaging for low back pain in primary and emergency care? Systematic review and meta-analysis of over 4 million imaging requests across 21 years. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2019; 12: 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100087
Reed, S, Pearson, S. Imaging for nonspecific low back pain. 2015: Retrieved from http://www.choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ICER_Low-Back-Pain.pdf
Papanicolas, I, Woskie, L, & Jha, A. Health-care spending in the United States and other high-income countries. JAMA, 2018; 319(10): 1024-1039. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1150
Lyu, H, Xu, T, Mayer-Blackwell, B, Cooper, M, Wick, E, Saini, V, Brownlee, S, Makary, M. Overtreatment in the United States. PLOS One 2017; 12(9): e0181970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181970
Cola, C, Morden, N, Sequist, T, Schpero, W, Rosenthal, M. Choosing wisely: Prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2014; 30: 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3420-5
Andel, C, Davidrow, S, Hollander, M., & Moreno, D. A. The economics of health care quality and medical errors. Journal of Health Care Finance, 39(1). Retrieved from http://www.ctcps.org/pdfs/JHCF_Fall12_Andel_etal.pdf
Weinstein, M, Skinner, J. Comparative effectiveness and health care spending – implications for reform. New England Journal of Medicine 2010; 362(5): 460-465. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb0911104
Balu, S. Estimated annual direct expenditures in the united states as a result of inappropriate hypertension treatment according to national treatment guidelines. Clinical Therapeutics 2009; 31(7): 1581-1594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.010
Casalino, L, Nicholson, S, Gans, D, Hammons, T, Morra, D, Karrison, T, Levinson, W. What does it cost physician practices to interact with health insurance plans? Health Affairs 2009; 28(1): 534-543. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w533
Bentley, T, Effros, R, Palar, K, Keeler, M. Waste in the U.S. health care system: A conceptual framework. The Milbank Quarterly 2008; 86(4): 629–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00537.x
Ray, M, Tallman, G, Bearden, D, Elman, M, McGregor, J. Antibiotic prescribing without documented indication in ambulatory care clinics: national cross sectional study. BMJ 2019; 367: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6461 31.
New England Healthcare Institute. Waste and Inefficiency in the U.S. healthcare system. 2008. Retrieved from https://media.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/nation/pdf/healthreport_092909.pdf
Wani, D, Malhorta, M. Does the meaningful use of electronic health records improve patient outcomes? Journal of Operations Management 2018; 60: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.06.003
Kazley, A, Simpson, A, Simpson, K, Teufel, R. Association of electronic health records with cost savings in a national sample. Am J Manag Care 2014; 20(6): e183-e190. Retrieved from https://www.ajmc.com/journals/issue/2014
Adler-Milstein, J, Everson, J, Lee, S. EHR adoption and hospital performance: Time-related effects. Health Services Research 2015; 50(6): 1751-1771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12406 34.
Kern, L, Barron, Y, Dhopeshwarker, R, Edwards, A, Kaushal, R. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2013; 28(4): 496-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2237-8
Sharma, S., Traeger, A.C., Tcharkhedian, E., Harrison, J., Hersch, J.K., Pickles, K., Harris, I.A. and Maher, C.G., 2021. “I would not go to him”: Focus groups exploring community responses to a public health campaign aimed at reducing unnecessary diagnostic imaging of low back pain. Health Expectations, 24(2), pp.648-658.
Hall, A.M., Aubrey-Bassler, K., Thorne, B. and Maher, C.G., 2021. Do not routinely offer imaging for uncomplicated low back pain. bmj, 372.
To, D., De Carvalho, D., Pike, A., Etchegary, H., Patey, A., Toomey, E. and Hall, A., 2021. Exploring perceived barriers and enablers to fidelity of training and delivery of an intervention to reduce imaging for low back pain: a qualitative interview study protocol. HRB Open Research, 4(49), p.49.
Boyle, E.M., Fary, R.E., Kang, K., Evans, K., Rebbeck, T. and Beales, D.J., 2021. A systematic scoping review of patient health outcomes and perceptions following management of low back pain via care pathways in primary health care.
Braeuninger-Weimer, K., Anjarwalla, N., McGregor, A., Roberts, L., Sell, P. and Pincus, T., 2021. Improving consultations for persistent musculoskeletal low back pain in orthopaedic spine settings: an intervention development. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22(1), pp.1-11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest in the project.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Implementation Science & Operations Management
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doll, J., Kreikemeier, M., Maddigan, C. et al. Analyzing Unnecessary Imaging for Low Back Pain in Nebraska from a Statewide Health Information Exchange. J Med Syst 46, 51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01838-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01838-8