Skip to main content
Log in

Common Best Proximity Points: Global Optimal Solutions

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let S:AB and T:AB be given non-self mappings, where A and B are non-empty subsets of a metric space. As S and T are non-self mappings, the equations Sx=x and Tx=x do not necessarily have a common solution, called a common fixed point of the mappings S and T. Therefore, in such cases of non-existence of a common solution, it is attempted to find an element x that is closest to both Sx and Tx in some sense. Indeed, common best proximity point theorems explore the existence of such optimal solutions, known as common best proximity points, to the equations Sx=x and Tx=x when there is no common solution. It is remarked that the functions xd(x,Sx) and xd(x,Tx) gauge the error involved for an approximate solution of the equations Sx=x and Tx=x. In view of the fact that, for any element x in A, the distance between x and Sx, and the distance between x and Tx are at least the distance between the sets A and B, a common best proximity point theorem achieves global minimum of both functions xd(x,Sx) and xd(x,Tx) by stipulating a common approximate solution of the equations Sx=x and Tx=x to fulfill the condition that d(x,Sx)=d(x,Tx)=d(A,B). The purpose of this article is to elicit common best proximity point theorems for pairs of contractive non-self mappings and for pairs of contraction non-self mappings, yielding common optimal approximate solutions of certain fixed point equations. Besides establishing the existence of common best proximity points, iterative algorithms are also furnished to determine such optimal approximate solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Thagafi, M.A., Shahzad, N.: Convergence and existence results for best proximity points. Nonlinear Anal. 70(10), 3665–3671 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Eldred, A.A., Veeramani, P.: Existence and Convergence of best proximity points. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 323, 1001–1006 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Bari, C., Suzuki, T., Vetro, C.: Best proximity points for cyclic Meir-Keeler contractions. Nonlinear Anal. 69(11), 3790–3794 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Karpagam, S., Agrawal, S.: Best proximity point theorems for p-cyclic Meir-Keeler contractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 197308 (2009)

  5. Sadiq Basha, S.: Best proximity points: global optimal approximate solution. J. Glob. Optim. (2010). doi:10.1007/s10898-009-9521-0

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Thagafi, M.A., Shahzad, N.: Best proximity pairs and equilibrium pairs for Kakutani multimaps. Nonlinear Anal. 70(3), 1209–1216 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Thagafi, M.A., Shahzad, N.: Best proximity sets and equilibrium pairs for a finite family of multimaps. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 457069 (2008)

  8. Kim, W.K., Kum, S., Lee, K.H.: On general best proximity pairs and equilibrium pairs in free abstract economies. Nonlinear Anal. 68(8), 2216–2227 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirk, W.A., Reich, S., Veeramani, P.: Proximinal retracts and best proximity pair theorems. Numer. Func. Anal. Optim. 24, 851–862 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadiq Basha, S., Veeramani, P.: Best approximations and best proximity pairs. Acta. Sci. Math. (Szeged) 63, 289–300 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadiq Basha, S., Veeramani, P.: Best proximity pair theorems for multifunctions with open fibres. J. Approx. Theory 103, 119–129 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadiq Basha, S., Veeramani, P., Pai, D.V.: Best proximity pair theorems. Ind. J. Pure Appl. Math. 32, 1237–1246 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivasan, P.S.: Best proximity pair theorems. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 67, 421–429 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wlodarczyk, K., Plebaniak, R., Banach, A.: Best proximity points for cyclic and noncyclic set-valued relatively quasi-asymptotic contractions in uniform spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 70(9), 3332–3341 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Eldred, A.A., Kirk, W.A., Veeramani, P.: Proximinal normal structure and relatively nonexpansive mappings. Stud. Math. 171(3), 283–293 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sankar Raj, V., Veeramani, P.: Best proximity pair theorems for relatively nonexpansive mappings. Appl. Gen. Topol. 10(1), 21–28 (2009)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Anuradha, J., Veeramani, P.: Proximal pointwise contraction. Topol. Its Appl. 156(18), 2942–2948 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Edelstein, M.: On fixed and periodic points under contractive mappings. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 37, 74–79 (1962)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sadiq Basha.

Additional information

Communicated by J.-C. Yao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shahzad, N., Sadiq Basha, S. & Jeyaraj, R. Common Best Proximity Points: Global Optimal Solutions. J Optim Theory Appl 148, 69–78 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-010-9745-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-010-9745-7

Keywords

Navigation