Skip to main content
Log in

A Bidding Game with Heterogeneous Players

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A one-sided limit order book is modeled as a noncooperative game for several players. Agents offer various quantities of an asset at different prices, competing to fulfill an incoming order, whose size is not known a priori. Players can have different payoff functions, reflecting different beliefs about the fundamental value of the asset and probability distribution of the random incoming order. In a previous paper, the existence of a Nash equilibrium was established by means of a fixed point argument. The main issue discussed in the present paper is whether this equilibrium can be obtained from the unique solution to a two-point boundary value problem, for a suitable system of discontinuous ordinary differential equations. Some additional assumptions are introduced, which yield a positive answer. In particular, this is true when there are exactly two players, or when all players assign the same exponential probability distribution to the incoming order. In both of these cases, we also prove that the Nash equilibrium is unique. A counterexample shows that these assumptions cannot be removed, in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bach, K., Baruch, S.: Strategic liquidity provision in limit order markets. Econometrica 81, 363–392 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cont, R., Stoikov, S., Talreja, R.: A stochastic model for order book dynamics. Oper. Res. 58, 549–563 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Obizhaeva, A., Wang, J.: Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics, J. Financ. Markets 16, 1–32 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Predoiu, S., Shaikhet, G., Shreve, S.: Optimal execution in a general one-sided limit-order book. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 2, 183–212 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Preis, T., Golke, S., Paul, W., Schneider, J.J.: Multi-agent-based order book model of financial markets. Europhys. Lett. 75, 510–516 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosu, I.: A dynamic model of the limit order book. Rev. Financ. Stud. 22, 4601–4641 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bressan, A., Facchi, G.: A bidding game in a continuum limit order book. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51, 3459–3485 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bressan, A., Facchi, G.: Discrete bidding strategies for a random buying order. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 5, 50–70 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bressan, A.: Noncooperative differential games. Milan J. Math. 79, 357–427 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dockner, E.J., Jorgensen, S., Long, N.V., Sorger, G.: Differential Games in Economics and Management Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, J.: The Theory of Games. Oxford University Press, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamke, E.: Zur Theorie der Systeme gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen II. Acta Math. 58, 57–85 (1932)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by NSF, with Grant DMS-1108702: “Problems of Nonlinear Control”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deling Wei.

Additional information

Communicated by Moawia Alghalith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bressan, A., Wei, D. A Bidding Game with Heterogeneous Players. J Optim Theory Appl 163, 1018–1048 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0551-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0551-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classiffication

Navigation