Skip to main content
Log in

Variable-Time-Domain Neighboring Optimal Guidance, Part 2: Application to Lunar Descent and Soft Landing

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, several countries have shown an increasing interest toward both manned and automatic lunar missions. The development of a safe and reliable guidance algorithm for lunar landing and soft touchdown represents a very relevant issue for establishing a real connection between the Earth and the Moon surface. This paper applies a new, general-purpose neighboring optimal guidance algorithm, proposed in a companion paper and capable of driving a dynamical system along a specified nominal, optimal path, to lunar descent and soft landing. This new closed-loop guidance, termed variable-time-domain neighboring optimal guidance, avoids the usual numerical difficulties related to the occurrence of singularities for the gain matrices, and is exempt from the main drawbacks of similar algorithms proposed in the past. For lunar descent, the nominal trajectory is represented by the minimum-time path departing from the periselenium of a given elliptic orbit and arriving at the Moon with no residual velocity. Perturbations arising from the imperfect knowledge of the propulsive parameters and from errors in the initial conditions are considered. At specified, equally spaced times the state displacements from the nominal flight conditions are evaluated, and the guidance algorithm yields the necessary control corrections. Extensive robustness and Monte Carlo tests are performed, and definitely prove the effectiveness, robustness, and accuracy of the new guidance scheme at hand, also in comparison with the well-established linear tangent steering law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klumpp A.R.: Apollo Guidance, Navigation and Control: Apollo Lunar Descent Guidance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Charles Stark Draper Lab., TR-R695, Cambridge, MA (1971).

  2. Chomel, C.T., Bishop, R.H.: Analytical lunar descent guidance algorithm. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 32(3), 915–926 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee A.Y.: Fuel-efficient Descent and Landing Guidance Logic for a Safe Lunar Touchdown. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Portland, OR (2011). AIAA Paper 2011–6499.

  4. Hull, D.G.: Optimal guidance for quasi-planar lunar descent with throttling. Adv. Astron. Sci. 140, 983–994 (2011). Paper AAS 11-169

    Google Scholar 

  5. Acikmese, B., Ploen, S.R.: Convex programming approach to powered descent guidance for mars landing. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 30(5), 1353–1366 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pontani M., Cecchetti G., Teofilatto P.: Variable-time-domain neighboring optimal guidance, Part 1: Algorithm structure. J. Optim. Theory. Appl. doi:10.1007/s10957-014-0676-6

  7. Vinh, N.X.: Optimal Space Trajectories in Atmospheric Flight, pp. 47–59. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hull, D.G.: Optimal Control Theory for Applications. Springer, New York (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Eberhart, R., Kennedy, J.: A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micromachine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan (1995)

  10. Pontani, M., Conway, B.A.: Particle swarm optimization applied to space trajectories. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 33(5), 1429–1441 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pontani, M., Conway, B.A.: Optimal low-thrust orbital maneuvers via indirect swarming method. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (2013)

  12. Pontani, M., Conway, B.A.: Optimal finite-thrust rendezvous trajectories found via particle swarm algorithm. J. Spacecr. Rock. 50(6), 1222–1234 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pontani, M., Conway, B.A.: Particle swarm optimization applied to impulsive orbital transfers. Acta Astron. 74, 141–155 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Townsend, G.E., Abbott, A.S., Palmer, R.R.: Guidance, Flight Mechanics and Trajectory Optimization, vol. VIII. Boost Guidance Equations. NASA Contractor Report, Washington, D.C. (1968)

  15. Smith I.E.: General Formulation of the Iterative Guidance Mode. Technical Memorandum X-53414, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL (1966)

  16. Fishman, G.S.: Monte Carlo Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ash, R.B.: Basic Probability Theory. Dover, Mineola (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro Pontani.

Additional information

Communicated by David G. Hull.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pontani, M., Cecchetti, G. & Teofilatto, P. Variable-Time-Domain Neighboring Optimal Guidance, Part 2: Application to Lunar Descent and Soft Landing. J Optim Theory Appl 166, 93–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0675-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0675-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation