Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-Automated Operational Modal Analysis Methodology to Optimize Modal Parameter Estimation

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 13 July 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Nowadays, long-term monitoring systems rely on the efficient implementation of automated methodologies to extract the modal parameters of buildings and bridges to assess their structural integrity. However, modal parameter estimation, usually, requires a certain level of user interaction, mainly when parametric system identification methods are used. Such procedures generally depend on the selection of a set of parameters, defined according to heuristic criteria, and kept constant during long monitoring campaigns. The main objective of this paper is to prove the necessity of abandoning identification approaches based on a single set of parameters for long-term monitoring campaigns and to propose a semi-automated modal identification tool, where the user-defined parameters vary within an established range of values, that can be set independently of the user’s expertise. The proposed method is validated with an application in the operational modal analysis of a historic civic tower, and its excellent results demonstrate the importance of considering multiple sets of parameters, mainly when dealing with complex structures and challenging monitoring conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Peeters, B., De Roeck, G., Pollet, T., Schueremans, L.: Stochastic subspace techniques applied to parameter identification of civil engineering structures. In: Proceedings of New Advances in Modal Synthesis of Large Structures: Nonlinear, Damped and Nondeterministic Cases, pp. 151–162 (1995)

  2. Reynders, E., De Roeck, G.: Reference-based combined deterministic-stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22, 617–637 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Magalhães, F., Caetano, E., Cunha, A.: Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 316–329 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pridham, B., Wilson, J.: An application example illustrating the practical issues of subspace identification. In: Proceedings of the 21th International Modal Analysis Conference, Kissimmee, USA (2003)

  5. Reynders, E., Maes, K., Lombaert, G., De Roeck, G.: Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: validation and applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 66–67, 13–30 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rainieri, C., Fabbrocino, G.: Influence of model order and number of block rows on accuracy and precision of modal parameter estimates in stochastic subspace identification. Int. J. Lifecycle Perform. Eng. 1(4), 317–334 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Priori, C., De Angelis, M., Betti, R.: On the selection of user-defined parameters in data-driven stochastic subspace identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 100, 501–523 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Verboven, P., Parloo, E., Guillaume, P., Van Overmeire, M.: Autonomous structural health monitoring part i: modal parameter estimation and tracking. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 16(4), 637–657 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pappa, R.S., James, G.H., Zimmerman, D.C.: Autonomous modal identification of the space shuttle tail rudder. J. Spacecr. Rockets 35(2), 163–169 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, D.L., Allemang, R.J., Phillips, A. W.: Survey of Modal Techniques Applicable to Autonomous/Semi-Autonomous Parameter Identification (2010)

  11. Reynders, E., Houbrechts, J., De Roeck, G.: Fully automated (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 29, 228–250 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ubertini, F., Gentile, C., Materazzi, A.L.: Automated modal identification in operational conditions and its application to bridges. Eng. Struct. 46, 264–278 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong, A.: Weighting Matrices and Model Order Determination in Stochastic System Identification for Civil Infrastructure Systems (Ph.D. thesis). Columbia University, New York (2010)

  14. Mahalanobis, P.C.: On the Generalized Distance in Statistics. National Institute of Science of India, Bengaluru (1936)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tronci E.M.: Damage Sensitive Features. From Classic Parameters to New Indicators (Ph.D. thesis). Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (2019)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maurizio De Angelis, Raimondo Betti or Vittorio Altomare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: The conversion error occurred during the production process in usage of Greek characters has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tronci, E.M., De Angelis, M., Betti, R. et al. Semi-Automated Operational Modal Analysis Methodology to Optimize Modal Parameter Estimation. J Optim Theory Appl 187, 842–854 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01694-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-020-01694-x

Keywords

Navigation