Skip to main content
Log in

Radical Semantics: A New Theory of Meaning

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends Parikh’s earlier work in semantics with games of partial information and attempts to derive and represent the full content of an utterance from first principles. It also discusses various ways in which this content may be indeterminate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akman, V. (2002): Context and the indexical ‘I’. Powerpoint presentation at http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/∼akman/papers.html, presented at NASSLLI, Stanford University.

  2. Austin, J. L. (1975): in J. O. Urmson and M. Sbisa, How To Do Things With Words, (eds.), 2nd edn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Austin, J. L. (1979): How to talk – some simple ways, in J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Austin, J. L. (1979): Performative utterances, in J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Austin, J. L. (1979): Truth, in J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barwise, J. (1989): Information and circumstance, in The Situation in Logic, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983): Situations and Attitudes, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blutner, R. and Zeevat, H. (2004): Editors' introduction: Pragmatics in optimality theory, in R. Blutner and H. Zeevat (eds.), Optimality Theory and Pragmatics, Palgrave Macmillan, UK, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blutner, R. and Zeevat, H. (eds.) (2004): Optimality Theory and Pragmatics, Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition, Palgrave Macmillan, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. (2004): Radical and moderate pragmatics: Does meaning determine truth conditions? Unpublished.

  11. Carston, R. (2004): Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction, in L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chierchia, G. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1996): Meaning and Grammar, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grice, H. P. (1957): Meaning, Philos. Rev. 66, 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grice, H. P. (1969): Utterer's meaning and intentions, Philos. Rev. 78, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grice, H. P. (1989): Logic and conversation, in Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grice, H. P. (1989): Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horn, L. R. and Ward, G. (2004): The Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Merin, A. (1999): Information, relevance, and social decision making, in L. Moss, J. Ginzburg, and M. de Rijke (eds.), Logic, Language, and Computation, Vol. 2, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Osborne, M. J. and Rubinstein, A. (1994): A Course in Game Theory, The MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parikh, P. (1987): Language and Strategic Inference, PhD thesis, Stanford University.

  21. Parikh, P. (1990): Situations, games, and ambiguity, in R. Cooper, K. Mukai and J. Perry (eds.), Situation Theory and Its Applications, I, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parikh, P. (1992): A game-theoretic account of implicature, in Y. Moses (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann, California.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parikh, P. (2001): The Use of Language, CSLI Publications, Stanford University.

  24. Parikh, P. (2004): Pragmatics and games of partial information: Some aspects of literal content. Forthcoming.

  25. Parikh, P. (2005): Situations, rules, and conventional meaning: Some uses of games of partial information. Forthcoming.

  26. Parikh, P. (April 2000): Communication, meaning, and interpretation, Linguist. Philos. 23, 185–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parikh, P. (October 1991): Communication and strategic inference, Linguist. Philos. 14, 473–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Recanati, F. (2004): Literal Meaning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Recanati, F. (2004): Pragmatics and semantics, in L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ross, I. (2004): Games interlocutors play: The unification of implicature. Unpublished dissertation proposal.

  31. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986): Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell.

  32. Strawson, P. F. (1964): Intention and convention in speech acts, Philos. Rev. 73, 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Travis, C. (1996): Meaning's role in truth, Mind 105, 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. van Rooy, R. (2004): Signaling games select Horn strategies, Linguist. Philos. 27, 493–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Rooy, R. (2004): Utility, informativity and protocols, J. Philos. Logic 33, 389–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1986): On defining relevance, in R. Grandy and R. Warner (eds.), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004): Relevance theory, in L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Parikh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parikh, P. Radical Semantics: A New Theory of Meaning. J Philos Logic 35, 349–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-005-9017-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-005-9017-4

Keywords

Navigation