Abstract
Call an argument a ‘happy sorites’ if it is a sorites argument with true premises and a false conclusion. It is a striking fact that although most philosophers working on the sorites paradox find it at prima facie highly compelling that the premises of the sorites paradox are true and its conclusion false, few (if any) of the standard theories on the issue ultimately allow for happy sorites arguments. There is one philosophical view, however, that appears to allow for at least some happy sorites arguments: strict finitism in the philosophy of mathematics. My aim in this paper is to explore to what extent this appearance is accurate. As we shall see, this question is far from trivial. In particular, I will discuss two arguments that threaten to show that strict finitism cannot consistently accept happy sorites arguments, but I will argue that (given reasonable assumptions on strict finitistic logic) these arguments can ultimately be avoided, and the view can indeed allow for happy sorites arguments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boolos, G. (1984). Don’t eliminate cut. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 13, 373–378.
Boolos, G. (1991). Zooming down the slippery slope. Nous, 25, 695–706.
Buss, S. (1998a). An introduction to proof theory. In Buss, S. (ed.), Handbook of Proof Theory. Elsevier.
Buss, S. (1998b). First-order proof theory of arithmetic. In Buss, S. (ed.), Handbook of Proof Theory, Elsevier.
Dedekind, R. (1963) Essays on the Theory of Numbers, translated by Beman, W. Dover Publications.
Dummett, M. (1975). Wang’s paradox. Synthese, 30, 301–324.
Dummett, M. (1977). Elements of Intuitionism. Oxford University Press.
Fara, D. (2001). Phenomenal Continua and the Sorites. Mind, 110, 905–935 (Originally published under ‘Delia Graff’).
Frege, G. (1974). The Foundations of Arithmetic, translated by Austin, J.L. Oxford University Press.
Magidor, O. (2007). Strict finitism refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, CVII, 403–411.
Read, S., & Wright, C. (1985). Hairier than Putnam thought. Analysis, 45, 56–58.
Tennant, N. (1997). The Taming of the True, Oxford University Press.
Wright, C. (1982). Strict Finitism. Synthese, 51, 203–282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magidor, O. Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites. J Philos Logic 41, 471–491 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9180-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9180-8