Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Development of Human Expertise in a Complex Environment

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce an innovative technique that quantifies human expertise development in such a way that humans and artificial systems can be directly compared. Using this technique we are able to highlight certain fundamental difficulties associated with the learning of a complex task that humans are still exceptionally better at than their computer counterparts. We demonstrate that expertise goes through significant developmental transitions that have previously been predicted but never explicated. The first signals the onset of a steady increase in global awareness that begins surprisingly late in expertise acquisition. The second transition, reached by only a very few experts in the world, shows a major reorganisation of global contextual knowledge resulting in a relatively minor gain in skill. We are able to show that these empirical findings have consequences for our understanding of the way in which expertise acquisition may be modelled by learning in artificial intelligence systems. This point is emphasised with a novel theoretical result showing explicitly how our findings imply a non-trivial hurdle for learning for suitably complex tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There is a great deal of information regarding Go available at: http://senseis.xmp.net.

  2. We will only use log2 so the information measured is always in bits.

  3. Note that we make the usual assumptions of 0 log(0) = 0 and 0 log(0/0) = 0.

  4. From the GoGod collection: http://www.gogod.co.uk.

  5. From the KGS Go server: http://www.gokgs.com.

References

  • Atherton, M., Zhuang, J., Bart, W., Hu, X., & He, S. (2003). A functional MRI study of high-level cognition. I. The game of chess. Cognitive Brain Research 16(1), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. (1990). Elephants don’t play chess. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 6(1–2), 3–15, designing Autonomous Agents.

  • Burmeister, J., & Wiles, J. (1995). The challenge of Go as a domain for AI research: A comparison between Go and chess. In: Proceedings of the third Australian and New Zealand conference on intelligent information systems.

  • Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S., Hutchison, S., Perrig-Chiello, P., Däpp, C., Müller, M., et al. (2008). Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults. Psychology and Aging 23(4), 743–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., Hoane, A., Jr., & Hsu, F. (2002). Deep blue. Artificial Intelligence, 134(1–2), 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W., & Simon, H. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Zhang, D., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Meng, X., He, S., et al. (2003). A functional MRI study of high-level cognition:: II. The game of GO. Cognitive Brain Research 16(1), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., & Kenning, P. (2005). Nonlinear responses within the medial prefrontal cortex reveal when specific implicit information influences economic decision making. Journal of Neuroimaging, 15(2), 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1992). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, S. (2007). Why expert systems do not exhibit expertise. IEEE Expert 1(2), 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekbia, H. (2008). Artificial dreams: The quest for non-biological intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R., Tuholski, S., Laughlin, J., & Conway, A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist 49, 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K., & Lehmann, A. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology 47, 273–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review—New York 100, 363–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamez, D. (2008). Progress in machine consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 17(3), 887–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F. (1998). Expert memory: A comparison of four theories. Cognition 66(2), 115–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F. (2005). Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F., & Simon, H. (1996). Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3(2), 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A., & Gobet, F. (1996). Perception and memory in chess. Assen: Van Gorcum and Co.

  • Jaeggi, S., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(19), 6829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. (1951). On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1), 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, B., Yeh, Y., Chen, D., Liang, K., & Chen, J. (2008). The capacity constraint in the prefrontal and parietal regions for coordinating dual arithmetic tasks. Brain Research, 1199, 100–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. (1991). Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information theory 37(1), 145–151.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L., & Polk, T. (2008). The computational cognitive neuroscience of learning and memory: Principles and models. Advances in Psychology, 139, 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, J. (1976). Skilled perception in Go: Deducing memory structures from inter-response times. Cognitive Psychology 8(3), 336–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. (2006). The expert mind. Scientific American, 295(2), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulston, M. (1999). Estimating the errors on measured entropy and mutual information. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 125(3–4), 285–294.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial intelligence 4(3–4), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D., Herbrich, R., & Graepel, T. (2006). Bayesian pattern ranking for move prediction in the game of go. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning (Vol. 148, pp 873–880).

  • Tromp, J., & Farnebäck, G. (2006). Combinatorics of Go. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on computers and games (pp 84–99). Berlin: Springer.

  • Wang, P. (2007). Three fundamental misconceptions of artificial intelligence. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 19, 249–268.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Gelly, S. (2007). Modifications of UCT and sequence-like simulations for Monte-Carlo Go. In: IEEE symposium on computational intelligence and games (pp. 175–182). Honolulu, Hawaii.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Harré.

Additional information

This work was supported by ARC grant DP0881829 and by US Air Force grant AOARD 09094.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harré, M., Bossomaier, T. & Snyder, A. The Development of Human Expertise in a Complex Environment. Minds & Machines 21, 449–464 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9247-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9247-x

Keywords

Navigation