Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Evaluation of a Power Management Scheme for Disruption Tolerant Network

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disruption tolerant network (DTN) is characterized by frequent partitions and intermittent connectivity. Power management issue in such networks is challenging. Existing power management schemes for wireless networks cannot be directly applied to DTNs because they assume the networks are well-connected. Since the network connectivity opportunities are rare, any power management scheme deployed in DTNs should not worsen the existing network connectivity. In this paper, we design a power management scheme called context-aware power management scheme (CAPM) for DTNs. Our CAPM scheme has an adaptive on period feature that allows it to achieve high delivery ratio and low delivery latency when used with Prophet, a recently proposed DTN routing scheme. Via simulations, we evaluate the performance of the CAPM scheme when used with the Prophet routing scheme in different scenarios e.g. different traffic load, node speeds and sleep patterns. Our evaluation results indicate that the CAPM scheme is very promising in providing energy saving (as high as 80%) without degrading much the data delivery performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fall K (2003) A delay-tolerant network architecture for chanllenged internets. In: Proceedings of ACM Sigcomm, Karlsruhe, 25–29 August 2003

  2. Burgess J, Gallagher B, Jensen D, Levine BL (2006) Maxprop: routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, Barcelona, 23–29 April 2006

  3. Jain S, Fall K, Patra R (2004) Routing in a delay tolerant network. In: Proceedings of ACM Sigcomm, Portland, 30 August–3 September 2004

  4. Tariq MMB, Ammar M, Zegura E (2006) Message ferry route design for sparse ad hoc networks with mobile nodes. In: ACM MobiHoc, Florence, 22–25 May 2006

  5. Lindgren A, Doria A, Scheln O (2004) Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks. In: Proc. Workshop on Service Assurance with partial and intermittent resources, Fortaleza, 1–6 August 2004

  6. Jun H, Ammar MH, Zegura EW (2005) Power management in delay tolerant networks: a framework and knowledge-based mechanisms. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Santa Clara, 26–29 September 2005

  7. Jun H, Ammar M, Corner M, Zegura E (2006) Hierarchical power management in disruption tolerant networks with traffic-aware optimization. In: ACM Sigcomm Workshop on Challenged Networks (CHANTS), Pisa, 15 September 2006

  8. Armstrong T (2005) Wake-up based power management in multi-hop wireless networks. Term Survey Paper, University of Toronto

  9. Zheng R, Hou JC, Sha L (2003) Asynchronous wakeup for ad hoc networks. In: MobiHoc’03, Annapolis, 1–3 June 2003

  10. Feeney LM, Nilsson M (2001) Investigating the energy consumption of a wireless network interface in an ad hoc network. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, 22–26 April 2001

  11. Internet Engineering Task Force (2003) Power Saving in 802.11. http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg03227.html

  12. NS (2008) The network simulator ns-2, [Online]. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

  13. Tseng Yu, Hsu C, Hsieh T (2002) Power-saving protocols for IEEE 802.11-based multi-hop ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, New York, 23–27 June 2002

  14. Chen B et al (2001) Span: an energy efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks. In: Proceedings of 7th ACM, Mobicom, Rome, 16–21 July 2001

  15. Awerbuch B et al (2004) The pulse protocol: energy efficient infrastructure access. In: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, Hong Kong, 7–11 March 2004

  16. Shih E, Bahl P, Sincalir MJ (2002) Wake on wireless: an event driven energy saving strategy for battery operated devices. In: Proceedings of ACM Mobicom, Atlanta, 23–28 September 2002

  17. Miller MJ, Vaidya NH (2004) Power save mechanisms for multihop wireless networks. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Broadband Networks, San Jose, 25–29 October 2004

  18. Spyropoulos T et al (2006) Performance analysis of mobility-assisted routing. In: Proceedings of ACM Mobihoc, Florence, 22–25 May 2006

  19. Carvalho M, Garcia-Luna-Aceves JJ (2003) Delay analysis of IEEE 802.11 in single-hop networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, Atlanta, 4–7 November 2003

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by DARPA under Contract W15P7T-06-C-P430. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Chuah.

Additional information

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.

Appendix

Appendix

Average taccess:

$$t_{access} = \overline T _B + t_s $$
(5)

\(\overline {T_B } \) is the average backoff time, ts is the average time the channel is sensed busy because of a successful transmission.

\(\overline {T_B } \) can be computed as follows:

$$\overline T _B = \frac{{\alpha \left( {W_{\min } \beta - 1} \right)}}{{2q}} + \frac{{1 - q}}{q}t_c $$
(6)
q:

the success probability that a packet experiences when it is transmitted.

t c :

the average time the channel is sensed busy due to a collision in the channel.

Wmin is the minimum contention window size, and α, β are defined in Eqns (8) and (9).

t s : can be computed as

$$\begin{aligned} t_s = RTS + SIFS + \tau + CTS + SIFS + \tau + H + E\left\{ P \right\} \\ + SIFS + \tau + ACK + DIFS + \tau \\ \end{aligned} $$
(7)

where τ is the probability that a node transmits in a randomly chosen slot time, H is the packet header transmission time, E{P} is the average packet transmission time. RTS, CTS, SIFS, DIFS, ACK are parameters related to the 802.11 MAC protocol [13].

Equation for computing each variable:

$$\alpha = \sigma p_i + t_c p_c + t_s p_s $$
(8)
$$\beta = \frac{{q - 2^m \left( {1 - q} \right)^{m + 1} }}{{1 - 2\left( {1 - q} \right)}}$$
(9)
$$q \approx \frac{{\left( {W_{\min } + 1} \right)^2 }}{{\left( {W_{\min } + 1} \right)^2 + 2W_{\min } \left( {n - 1} \right)}}$$
(10)
$$t_c = RTS + DIFS + \tau $$
(11)
$$P_{tr} = 1 - \left( {1 - \tau } \right)^{n - 1} $$
(12)
$$P_{suc} = \frac{{\left( {n - 1} \right)\tau \left( {1 - \tau } \right)^{n - 2} }}{{1 - \left( {1 - \tau } \right)^{n - 1} }}$$
(13)
$$p_s = P_{tr} P_{suc} $$
(14)
$$p_i = 1 - P_{tr} $$
(15)
$$p_c = P_{tr} \left( {1 - P_{suc} } \right)$$
(16)

Equations [14],[15], and [16] are used in Eqn [8].

Equations [8]–[11] are used in Eqn [6].

$$p = \frac{{2W_{\min } \left( {n - 1} \right)}}{{\left( {W_{\min } + 1} \right)^2 + 2W_{\min } \left( {n - 1} \right)}}$$
(17)
$$\tau = \frac{{2\left( {1 - 2p} \right)}}{{\left( {1 - 2p} \right)\left( {W_{\min } + 1} \right) + pW_{\min } \left( {1 - \left( {2p} \right)^m } \right)}}$$
(18)

Eqn (17) is used in Eqn (18), and Eqn (18) is used in Eqn (7)

n :

number of nodes

σ :

slot size of the backoff timer

Using the parameter values in Table 4, we obtain taccess and hence obtain θ′ to be approximately 0.3 θ for medium traffic load.

Table 4 Physical layer parameters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xi, Y., Chuah, M. & Chang, K. Performance Evaluation of a Power Management Scheme for Disruption Tolerant Network. Mobile Netw Appl 12, 370–380 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-008-0046-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-008-0046-4

Keywords

Navigation