Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Survey of Localization Systems in Internet of Things

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid development in wireless technologies and the Internet, the Internet of Things (IoT) is envisioned to be an integral part of our daily lives. Localization-based services are among the most attractive applications related to the IoT. They are actually, thanks to the deployment of networks of sensors, able to collect and transmit data in order to determine the targets position. A plethora of localization systems are proposed in the literature. These localization systems are based on different positioning approaches, different techniques and different technologies, making them appropriate for some applications and inappropriate for other applications. This survey provides a general overview of the localization in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and surveys technical details related to approaches and algorithms of various important localization techniques using different technologies. Based on the localization approaches, we propose to classify the localization systems to centralized, distributed and interactive. Considering the techniques of localization, we classify them to distance measurement, angle measurement, arear measurement and hop-count measurement based. Finally, Depending on the manner of the wireless devices interaction with the target, we classify the localization systems to two categories: device-based and device-free systems. In device-based techniques, localization is linked to the target, and localization is determined thanks to the cooperation with other deployed wireless devices. Whereas in the device-free systems, the target does not include any wireless device according to the localization. We compare exhaustively each system in terms of precision, cost, evolution and energy efficiency. Furthermore, we show the importance of localization in modern IoT application such as smart city, smart transportation and mobility. In this concern, we provide an overview of the main challenges of localization in IoT exposed recently in the literature. Finally, we suggest in this paper some future directions in localization studies. This paper intends to help new researchers in the field of localization and IoT by providing a comprehensive survey on recent advances in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halder S, Ghosal A (2016) A survey on mobility-assisted localization techniques in wireless sensor networks. J Netw Comput Appl 60:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noel A, Abdaoui A, Badawy A, Elfouly T, Ahmed M, Shehata M (2017). Structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials

  3. Qin J, Sun S, Deng Q, Liu L, Tian Y (2017) Indoor trajectory tracking scheme based on Delaunay triangulation and heuristic information in wireless sensor networks. Sensors 17(6):1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li J, Yue X, Chen J, Deng F (2017) A novel robust trilateration method applied to ultra-wide bandwidth location systems. Sensors 17(4):795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira A, Fernandes D, Catarino A, Monteiro J (2017) Localization and positioning systems for emergency responders: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials

  6. Stoleru R, He T, Stankovic JA (2004) Walking GPS: a practical solution for localization in manually deployed wireless sensor networks. In: Local Computer Networks, 2004. 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, p 480–489

  7. Fox D, Burgard W, Dellaert F, Thrun S (1999) Monte Carlo localization: efficient position estimation for mobile robots. AAAI/IAAI 1999(343–349):2–2

  8. Chen D, Liu Z, Wang L, Dou M, Chen J, Li H (2013) Natural disaster monitoring with wireless sensor networks: a case study of data-intensive applications upon low-cost scalable systems. Mobile Netw Appl 18(5):651–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shang Y, Ruml W, Zhang Y, Fromherz MP (2003) Localization from mere connectivity. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing. ACM, p 201–212

  10. Zhang S, Zhang B, Er MJ, Guan Z (2016) A novel node localization algorithm for anisotropic wireless sensor networks with holes based on MDS-MAP and EKF. In: Region 10 Conference (TENCON), 2016 IEEE. IEEE, p 3022–3025

  11. Di Franco C, Melani A, Marinoni M (2015). Solving ambiguities in MDS relative localization. In: Advanced Robotics (ICAR), 2015 International Conference on. IEEE, p 230–236

  12. Liu J, Zhang Y, Zhao F (2006) Robust distributed node localization with error management. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing. ACM, p 250–261

  13. Maung NAM, Kawai M (2014) Experimental evaluations of RSS threshold-based optimised DV-HOP localisation for wireless ad-hoc networks. Electron Lett 50(17):1246–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Jia H, Chen F, Wen F, Liu X (2010) An improved DV-Distance localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: Advanced Computer Control (ICACC), 2010 2nd International Conference on (Vol. 5). IEEE, p 472–476

  15. Das SK, Wang J, Ghosh RK, Reiger R (2011) Algorithmic aspects of sensor localization. In: Theoretical aspects of distributed computing in sensor networks. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 257–291

  16. Xu S, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang J (2010) Iterative cooperation DV-hop localization algorithm in wireless sensor networks. In: Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2010-Spring), 2010 IEEE 71st. IEEE, p 1–5

  17. Mandal A, Lopes CV, Givargis T, Haghighat A, Jurdak R, Baldi P (2005) Beep: 3D indoor positioning using audible sound. In: Consumer communications and networking conference, 2005. CCNC. 2005 Second IEEE. IEEE, p 348–353

  18. Harter A, Hopper A, Steggles P, Ward A, Webster P (2002) The anatomy of a context-aware application. Wirel Netw 8(2/3):187–197

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Active Bat (2015) http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/bat

  20. Priyantha NB, Chakraborty A, Balakrishnan H (2000) The cricket location-support system. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, p 32–43

  21. Luo C, Li W, Yang H, Fan M, Yang X (2014) Mobile target positioning using refining distance measurements with inaccurate anchor nodes in chain-type wireless sensor networks. Mobile Netw Appl 19(3):363–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zebra technologies https://www.zebra.com/gb/en/products/location-solutions/wherenet.html

  23. Tsui AW, Chuang YH, Chu HH (2009) Unsupervised learning for solving RSS hardware variance problem in Wi-Fi localization. Mobile Netw Appl 14(5):677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumarasiri R, Alshamaileh K, Tran NH, Devabhaktuni V (2016) An improved hybrid RSS/TDOA wireless sensors localization technique utilizing Wi-Fi networks. Mobile Netw Appl 21(2):286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benson M (1819) Thoughts on education. Richard Baynes

  26. Kułakowski P, Vales-Alonso J, Egea-López E, Ludwin W, García-Haro J (2010) Angle-of-arrival localization based on antenna arrays for wireless sensor networks. Comput Electr Eng 36(6):1181–1186

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Steggles P, Gschwind S (2005) The Ubisense smart space platform

  28. Zeng Wang J, Jin H (2009) Improvement on APIT localization algorithms for wireless sensor networks. In: Networks Security, Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing, 2009. NSWCTC'09. International Conference on (Vol. 1). IEEE, p 719–723

  29. Liu J, Wang Z, Yao M, Qiu Z (2016) VN-APIT: virtual nodes-based range-free APIT localization scheme for WSN. Wirel Netw 22(3):867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. El Assaf A, Zaidi S, Affes S, Kandil N (2013). Hop-count based localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: Microwave Symposium (MMS), 2013 13th Mediterranean. IEEE, p 1–6

  31. Tseng CL, Liu FY, Lin CH, Lee CY (2016) A hop-count localization method with boundary improvement for wireless sensor networks. In: Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C), 2016 International Symposium on. IEEE, p 18–21

  32. Ruiz-Ruiz AJ, Canovas O, Lopez-de-Teruel PE (2013) A multisensor architecture providing location-based services for smartphones. Mobile Netw Appl 18(3):310–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Y, Shu L, Ortiz AM, Crespi N, Lv L (2014) Locating in crowdsourcing-based dataspace: wireless indoor localization without special devices. Mobile Netw Appl 19(4):534–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhuang Y, Syed Z, Georgy J, El-Sheimy N (2015) Autonomous smartphone-based Wi-fi positioning system by using access points localization and crowdsourcing. Pervasive Mob Comput 18:118–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang P, Zhang Y, Fu W, Liu H, Su X (2015) Indoor mobile localization based on Wi-Fi fingerprint's important access point. Int J Distrib Sens N

  36. Li WWL, Iltis RA, Win MZ (2013) A smartphone localization algorithm using RSSI and inertial sensor measurement fusion. In: Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2013 IEEE. IEEE, p 3335–3340

  37. Werner M, Kessel M, Marouane C (2011). Indoor positioning using smartphone camera. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, p 1–6

  38. Chen W, Wang W, Li Q, Chang Q, Hou H (2016) A crowd-sourcing indoor localization algorithm via optical camera on a smartphone assisted by wi-fi fingerprint RSSI. Sensors, 16(3):410.

  39. Song J, Hur S, Park Y (2015) Fingerprint-based user positioning method using image data of single camera. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, Banff, AB, Canada, p 13–16

  40. Lopes SI, Vieira JM, Reis J, Albuquerque D, Carvalho NB (2015) Accurate smartphone indoor positioning using a WSN infrastructure and non-invasive audio for TDoA estimation. PervasiveMob Comput 20:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu K, Liu X, Xie L, Li X (2013) Towards accurate acoustic localization on a smartphone. In: INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE. IEEE, p 495–499

  42. Estel M, Fischer L (2015) Feasibility of bluetooth iBeacons for indoor localization. Digital Enterprise Computing (DEC 2015)-GI-Edition: Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI). P-244. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik, printed by Köllen Druck+ Verlag GmbH, p 97–108

  43. Kriz P, Maly F, Kozel T (2016) Improving indoor localization using bluetooth low energy beacons. Mob Inf Syst

  44. Garrigós J, Molina JM, Alarcón M, Chazarra J, Ruiz-Canales A, Martínez JJ (2017) Platform for the management of hydraulic chambers based on mobile devices and Bluetooth low-energy motes. Agric Water Manag 183:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yan W, Jing Z, Nailong Z (2015) The designing of indoor localization system based on self-organized WSN using PulsON UWB sensors. In: Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), 2015 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, p 965–969

  46. Zhang C, Kuhn MJ, Merkl BC, Fathy AE, Mahfouz MR (2010) Real-time noncoherent UWB positioning radar with millimeter range accuracy: theory and experiment. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 58(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang D, Li H, Zhang Z, Peterson GD (2013) Compressive sensing based sub-mm accuracy UWB positioning systems: a space–time approach. Digital Signal Process 23(1):340–354

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Itagaki Y, Suzuki A, Iyota T (2012) Indoor positioning for moving objects using a hardware device with spread spectrum ultrasonic waves. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE, p 1–6

  49. Li J, Han G, Zhu C, Sun G (2016) An indoor ultrasonic positioning system based on TOA for internet of things. Mob Inf Syst

  50. De Angelis A, Moschitta A, Carbone P, Calderini M, Neri S, Borgna R, Peppucci M (2015) Design and characterization of a portable ultrasonic indoor 3-D positioning system. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 64(10):2616–2625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Brandl M, Posnicek T, Kellner K (2016) Position estimation of RFID-based sensors using SAW compressive receivers. Sensors Actuators A Phys 244:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Son Y, Joung M, Lee YW, Kwon OH, Song HJ (2016) Tag localization in a two-dimensional RFID tag matrix. Futur Gener Comput Syst

  53. Saab SS, Nakad ZS (2011) A standalone RFID indoor positioning system using passive tags. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(5):1961–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gao Z, Ma Y, Liu K, Miao X, Zhao Y (2017) An indoor multi-tag cooperative localization algorithm based on NMDS for RFID. IEEE Sensors J 17(7):2120–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nakamura Y, Namimatsu Y, Miyazaki N, Matsuo Y, Nishimura T (2007) A method for estimating position and orientation with a topological approach using multiple infrared tags. In: Networked Sensing Systems, 2007. INSS'07. Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, p 187–195

  56. Want R, Hopper A, Falcao V, Gibbons J (1992) The active badge location system. ACM Trans Inf Syst 10(1):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yang B, Wei Q, Zhang M (2017) Multiple human location in a distributed binary pyroelectric infrared sensor network. Infrared Phys Technol

  58. Tao S, Kudo M, Pei BN, Nonaka H, Toyama J (2015) Multiperson locating and their soft tracking in a binary infrared sensor network. IEEE Trans Hum-Mach Syst 45(5):550–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Djuric PM, Vemula M, Bugallo MF (2008) Target tracking by particle filtering in binary sensor networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 56(6):2229–2238

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. de Miguel-Bilbao S, Roldan J, Garcia J, Lopez F, Garcia-Sagredo P, Ramos V (2013) Comparative analysis of indoor location technologies for monitoring of elderly. In: e-Health Networking, Applications & Services (Healthcom), 2013 IEEE 15th International Conference on. IEEE, p 320–323

  61. Sobhani B, Mazzotti M, Paolini E, Giorgetti A, Chiani M (2013) Effect of state space partitioning on Bayesian tracking for UWB radar sensor networks. In: Ultra-Wideband (ICUWB), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, p 120–125

  62. Mrazovac B, Bjelica MZ, Kukolj D, Todorovic BM, Samardzija D (2012) A human detection method for residential smart energy systems based on ZigBee RSSI changes. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 58(3)

  63. Caicedo D, Pandharipande A (2014) Distributed ultrasonic zoned presence sensing system. IEEE Sensors J 14(1):234–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mokhtari G, Zhang Q, Nourbakhsh G, Ball S, Karunanithi M (2017) BLUESOUND: a new resident identification sensor—using ultrasound Array and BLE Technology for Smart Home Platform. IEEE Sensors J 17(5):1503–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hnat TW, Griffiths E, Dawson R, Whitehouse K (2012) Doorjamb: unobtrusive room-level tracking of people in homes using doorway sensors. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, p 309–322

  66. Shu Y, Huang Y, Zhang J, Coué P, Cheng P, Chen J, Shin KG (2016) Gradient-based fingerprinting for indoor localization and tracking. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(4):2424–2433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Gong L, Yang W, Xiang C, Man D, Yu M, Yin Z (2016) WiSal: Ubiquitous Wi-Fi-Based Device-Free Passive Subarea Localization without Intensive Site-Survey. In: Trustcom/BigDataSE/I SPA, 2016 IEEE. IEEE, p 1129–1136

  68. Pirzada N, Nayan MY, Hassan MF, Subhan F, Sakidin H (2016). WLAN location fingerprinting technique for device-free indoor localization system. In: Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS), 2016 3rd International Conference on (pp. 650–655). IEEE

  69. Xiao J, Wu K, Yi Y, Wang L, Ni LM (2013) Pilot: passive device-free indoor localization using channel state information. In: Distributed computing systems (ICDCS), 2013 IEEE 33rd international conference on. IEEE, p 236–245

  70. Yang L, Lin Q, Li X, Liu T, Liu Y (2015) See through walls with cots rfid system!. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, p 487–499

  71. Wagner B, Timmermann D (2013) Approaches for device-free multi-user localization with passive RFID. In: Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, p 1–6

  72. Ruan W, Sheng QZ, Yao L, Gu T, Ruta M, Shangguan L (2016) Device-free indoor localization and tracking through human-object interactions. In: World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A. IEEE, p 1–9

  73. Sun Z, Wang P, Vuran MC, Al-Rodhaan MA, Al-Dhelaan AM, Akyildiz IF (2011) MISE-PIPE: magnetic induction-based wireless sensor networks for underground pipeline monitoring. Ad Hoc Netw 9(3):218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Haverinen J, Kemppainen A (2009) Global indoor self-localization based on the ambient magnetic field. Robot Auton Syst 57(10):1028–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Suksakulchai S, Thongchai S, Wilkes DM, Kawamura K (2000) Mobile robot localization using an electronic compass for corridor environment. In: Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000 IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 5). IEEE, p 3354–3359

  76. Sun Y, Meng W, Li C, Zhao N, Zhao K, Zhang N (2017) Human localization using multi-source heterogeneous data in indoor environments. IEEE Access 5:812–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sun Y, Zhao K, Wang J, Li W, Bai G, Zhang N (2016) Device-free human localization using panoramic camera and indoor map. In: Consumer Electronics-China (ICCE-China), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, p 1–5

  78. Liu S, Yin L, Ho WK, Ling KV, Schiavon S (2017) A tracking cooling fan using geofence and camera-based indoor localization. Build Environ 114:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Books, Internet of Things (IOT) and Its Applications in Electrical Power Industry, July 4th, 2017 https://www.electricaltechnology.org/2016/07/internet-of-things-iot-and-its-applications-in-electrical-power-industry.html

  80. Hui TK, Sherratt RS, Sánchez DD (2016). Major requirements for building Smart Homes in Smart Cities based on Internet of Things technologies. Futur Gener Comput Syst

  81. Schiller J, Voisard A (eds) (2004) Location-based services. Elsevier

  82. Čelan V, Stančić I, Musić J (2016). Cleaning up smart cities—localization of semi-autonomous floor scrubber. In: Computer and Energy Science (SpliTech), International Multidisciplinary Conference on. IEEE, p 1–6

  83. Zhabelova G, Vyatkin V (2012) Multiagent smart grid automation architecture based on IEC 61850/61499 intelligent logical nodes. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 59(5):2351–2362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Holenderski M, Verhoeven R, Ozcelebi T, Lukkien JJ (2014) Light pole localization in a smart city. In: Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2014 IEEE. IEEE, p 1–4

  85. Wu FJ, Luo T (2015) Infrastructureless signal source localization using crowdsourced data for smart-city applications. In: Communications (ICC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, p 586–591

  86. Chen M, Yang J, Zhu X, Wang X, Liu M, Song J (2017) Smart home 2.0: innovative smart home system powered by botanical IoT and emotion detection. Mobile Networks and Applications, p 1–11

  87. Jeong JP, Yeon S, Kim T, Lee H, Kim SM, Kim SC SALA: Smartphone-Assisted Localization Algorithm for Positioning Indoor IoT devices. Wireless Netw 1–21

  88. Mohammadi M, Al-Fuqaha A, Guizani M, Oh JS (2017) Semi-supervised deep reinforcement learning in support of IoT and smart city services. IEEE Internet of Things Journal

  89. Baek SH, Choi EC, Huh JD, Park KR (2007) Sensor information management mechanism for context-aware service in ubiquitous home. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 53(4)

  90. Yang Q, He Z, Zhao K, Gao T (2016) A time localization system in smart home using hierarchical structure and dynamic frequency. In: High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS), 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on. IEEE, p 831–838

  91. Gu Y, Ren F (2015) Energy-efficient indoor localization of smart hand-held devices using Bluetooth. IEEE Access 3:1450–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wan J, Tang S, Shu Z, Li D, Wang S, Imran M, Vasilakos AV (2016) Software-defined industrial internet of things in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Sensors J 16(20):7373–7380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lin K, Wang W, Bi Y, Qiu M, Hassan MM (2016) Human localization based on inertial sensors and fingerprints in the industrial internet of things. Comput Netw 101:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhai C, Zou Z, Zhou Q, Mao J, Chen Q, Tenhunen H et al (2017) A 2.4-GHz ISM RF and UWB hybrid RFID real-time locating system for industrial enterprise internet of things. Enterprise. Inf Syst 11(6):909–926

    Google Scholar 

  95. Zuehlke D (2010) Smart factory towards a factory-of-things. Annu Rev Control 34(1):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Görlich D, Stephan P, Quadflieg J (2007) Demonstrating remote operation of industrial devices using mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mobile technology, applications, and systems and the 1st international symposium on Computer human interaction in mobile technology. ACM, p 474–477

  97. Ha YG, Byun YC (2012). A ubiquitous homecare service system using a wearable user interface device. In: Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2012 IEEE/ACIS 11th International Conference on. IEEE, p 649–650

  98. Rahman T, Adams AT, Zhang M, Cherry E, Choudhury T (2015) BodyBeat: eavesdropping on our body using a wearable microphone. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications 19(1):14–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Calderoni L, Ferrara M, Franco A, Maio D (2015) Indoor localization in a hospital environment using random forest classifiers. Expert Syst Appl 42(1):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Belhajem I, Maissa YB, Tamtaoui A (2017) Improving vehicle localization in a Smart City with low cost sensor networks and support vector machines. Mobile Netw Appl 1–10

  101. Lee EK, Gerla M, Pau G, Lee U, Lim JH (2016) Internet of vehicles: from intelligent grid to autonomous cars and vehicular fogs. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 12(9):1550147716665500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Chen KW, Tsai HM, Hsieh CH, Lin SD, Wang CC, Yang SW, … Lee YJ (2014). Connected vehicle safety science, system, and framework. In Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2014 IEEE World Forum on. IEEE, p 235–240

  103. Llorca DF, Quintero R, Parra I, Sotelo MA (2017) Recognizing individuals in groups in outdoor environments combining stereo vision, RFID and BLE. Clust Comput 20(1):769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Olsen D (2015) IT Peer Network. https://itpeernetwork.intel.com/urban-growth-andsustainability-building-smart-cities-with-the-internet-of-things/. Accessed 5 June 2017

  105. Building S (2014) Real time monitoring and control Maximizing the added value of lot. http://www.wi4b.it/smart_building.php. Accessed 5 June 2017

  106. Chester D (2016) Embracing automation: getting behind the future of transport. https://infrastructuremagazine.com.au/2016/10/31/embracing-automation-getting-behind-the-futureof-transport/ Accessed 5 June 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fekher Khelifi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khelifi, F., Bradai, A., Benslimane, A. et al. A Survey of Localization Systems in Internet of Things. Mobile Netw Appl 24, 761–785 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1090-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1090-3

Keywords

Navigation