Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Innovative Citizen’s Services through Public Cloud in Pakistan: User’s Privacy Concerns and Impacts on Adoption

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The world is going to be more and more digital with effective utilization of information and communication technologies in government services to provide services to their citizens. In developing countries, public cloud is now considered a powerful platform, for providing scalable and cost effective public services to the citizens, due to their limited resources and budget. Public cloud has been adopted by both developed and developing countries for providing e-government services. User’s adoption is equally essential just like the government’s adoption of new services. Government needs to assess the user’s behavior intention and use behavior before choosing public cloud as platform for their innovative citizen’s services also known as government to citizen’s services (G2C). As citizen’s information is stored on public cloud, which is provided by a third party, so user’s concerns about privacy of information may affect the adoption of these services. The aim of this study is to find out the privacy factors that influence the adoption of e-government services by choosing and recommend suitable technology adoption model. As a methodology, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model was amended to add two additional privacy variables from e-commerce domain i.e., Perceived Internal Privacy Risk (PIPR) and Cloud Information Privacy Concern (CIPC). Thus the new model included in addition to PIPR and CIPC, its own four elements of performance expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Condition (FC). The data was collected from respondents who had used both public cloud and e-government services. Structure Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to investigate the effect of all variables on Behavior Intention (BI) and Use Behavior (UB). The findings show that Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE) and Social Influence (SI) had positive effects on user’s Behavior Intention (BI) while Cloud Information Privacy Concerns (CIPC) and Perceived Internet Privacy Risks (PIPR) had negative effects on Behavior Intention (BI). The Facilitating Conditions (FC) and Behavior Intention (BI) had a strong positive effect on User Behavior (UB).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mukerji M (2013) Introduction. In: ICTs and development, Springer, pp. 1–11

  2. Basu S (2004) E-government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers, & Technology 18(1):109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris JG, Alter AE (2010) Cloudrise: rewards and risks at the dawn of cloud computing. 20

  4. Umar MM, Mehmood A, Song H, Choo K-KR (2017) I-marks: an iris code embedding system for ownership identification of multimedia content. Comput Electr Eng 63:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alshawi S, Alalwany H (2009) E-government evaluation: Citizen’s perspective in developing countries. Inf Technol Dev 15(3):193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 425–478

  7. Alshehri M, Drew S, Alfarraj O (2012) A comprehensive analysis of E-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia: obstacles and challenges. High Educ 6:8–2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suna D, Changb G, Suna L, Wanga X (2011) Surveying and analyzing security, privacy and trust issues in cloud computing environments. Procedia Engineering 15:2852–2856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan R, Mehmood A (2012) Realization of interoperability & portability among open clouds by using agents mobility & intelligence. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering 3(7):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heeks R, Bailur S (2007) Analyzing E-government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Gov Inf Q 24(2):243–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehmood A, Roman M, Umar MM, Song H (2015) Cloud computing security: a survey. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 13(7):20

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mehmood A, Alrajeh N, Mukherjee M, Abdullah S, Song H (2018) A survey on proactive, active and passive fault diagnosis protocols for wsns: network operation perspective. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 18(6):1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurfal M, Arifolu A, Tokdemir G, Pain Y (2017) Adoption of E-government Services in Turkey. Comput Hum Behav 66:168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Z, Mehmood A, Shu L, Huo Z, Zhang Y, Mukherjee M (2018) A survey on fault diagnosis in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 6:11349–11364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sang S, Lee J, Lee J (2010) E-government adoption in Cambodia: a partial least squares approach, trans- forming government: people. Process and Policy 4(2):138–157

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mehmood A, Ahmed SH, Sarkar M (2017) Cyber-physical systems in vehicular communications, in: Handbook of Research on Advanced Trends in Microwave and Communication Engineering, IGI Global, pp. 477– 497

  17. Arshad S, Shah MA, Wahid A, Mehmood A, Song H, Yu H (2018) Samadroid: a novel 3-level hybrid malware detection model for android operating system. IEEE Access 6:4321–4339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma MK, Thapliyal MP (2011) G-cloud: (E-governance in cloud). International Journal Engg TechSci 2(2):134–137

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang M, Zhang Y, Jing W, Mehmood A (2017) Wireless Internet: 9th International Conference, WICON 2016, Haikou, China, December 19-20, 2016, Proceedings, Vol. 214, Springer

  20. Susanto TD, Goodwin R (2013) User acceptance of SMS-based e-government services: differences between adopters and non-adopters. Gov Inf Q 30(4):486–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Majeed MF, Esichaikul V, No ME (2013) Use of Multi-agent Based Platform for Providing Document-Centric Interoperability in the Realm of E-government, in: International Conference on Advances in Information Technology, Springer, pp. 141–149

  22. Mehmood A, Mauri JL, Noman M, Song H (2015) Improvement of the wireless sensor network lifetime using leach with vice-cluster head. Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks 28(1-2):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moon MJ, Norris DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and E-government at the municipal level. Inf Syst J 15(1):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yildiz M (2007) E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Gov Inf Q 24(3):646–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee J, Kim HJ, Ahn MJ (2011) The willingness of e-government service adoption by business users: the role of offline service quality and Trust in Technology. Gov Inf Q 28(2):222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qaiser N, Khan HGA (2010) E-government challenges in public sector. Int J Comput Sci 7(5):310–317

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mehmood A, Khanan A, Mohamed AHH, Mahfooz S, Song H, Abdullah S (2018) Antsc: an intelligent naive bayesian probabilistic estimation practice for traffic flow to form stable clustering in vanet. IEEE Access 6:4452–4461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehmood A, Mukherjee M, Ahmed SH, Song H, Malik KM (2018) Nbc-maids: Na¨ıve bayesian classifi- cation technique in multi-agent system-enriched ids for securing iot against ddos attacks, J Supercomput 1–15

  29. Ren L, Zhang L, Wang L, Tao F, Chai X (2017) Cloud manufacturing: key characteristics and applications. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30(6):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou J, Yang J, Song H, Ahmed SH, Mehmood A, Lv H (2016) An online marking system conducive to learning. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(5):2463–2471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aldegheishem A, Yasmeen H, Maryam H, Shah MA, Mehmood A, Alrajeh N, Song H (2018) Smart road traffic accidents reduction strategy based on intelligent transportation systems (tars). Sensors 18(7):1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mell P, Grance T, et al (2011) The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, Tech. rep., National Institute of Standards & Technology

  33. Wyld DC (2009) The utility of cloud computing as a new pricing and consumption model for information technology. International Journal of Database Management Systems (IJDMS) 1(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  34. Khan F, Zhang B, Khan S, Chen S (2011) Technological Leap Frogging E-government through Cloud Com- puting. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Broadband Network and Multimedia Technology (IC- BNMT), pp. 201–206

  35. Botta A, De Donato W, Persico V, Pescapé A (2016) Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: a survey. Futur Gener Comput Syst 56:684–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Attaran M (2017) Cloud computing technology: leveraging the power of the internet to improve business performance. Journal of International Technology and Information Management 26(1):112–137

    Google Scholar 

  37. Orakwue E (2010) Private clouds: secure managed services. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective 19(6):295–298

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hofmann P, Woods D (2010) Cloud computing: the limits of public clouds for business applications. IEEE Internet Comput 14(6):90–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Géczy, N. Izumi, K. Hasida, Cloudsourcing: Managing Cloud Adoption, Tech. rep. (2011)

  40. Krutz RL, Vines RD (2010) Cloud security: a comprehensive guide to secure cloud computing. Wiley Publishing, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sotomayor B, Montero RS, Llorente IM, Foster I (2009) Virtual infrastructure Management in Private and Hybrid Clouds. IEEE Internet Comput 13(5):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Montano DE, Kasprzyk D (2015) Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health behavior: Theory, Research and Practice 95–124

  43. Francescato G, Weidemann S, Anderson JR (2018) Evaluating the built environment from the users Perspective: implications of attitudinal models of satisfaction. In: Building performance evaluation, Springer, pp. 87–97

  44. de Camargo Fiorini P, Seles BMRP, Jabbour CJC, Mariano EB, de Sousa Jabbour ABL (2018) Management theory and big data literature: from a review to a research agenda. Int J Inf Manag 43:112–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hariguna T, Lai M, Hung C, Chen S (2017) Understanding information system quality on public E-government service intention: an empirical study. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 11(2-3):271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Carter L, Belanger F (2004) Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. In: proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE

  47. Alkhater N, Walters R, Wills G (2018) An empirical study of factors influencing cloud adoption among private sector Organisations. Telematics Inform 35(1):38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Reddick CG (2005) Citizen interaction with E-government: from the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly 22(1):38–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Maruping LM, Bala H, Venkatesh V, Brown SA (2017) Going beyond intention: integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 68(3):623–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Harby FA, Qahwaji R, Kamala M (2012) End-users acceptance of biometrics authentication to secure E- commerce within the context of Saudi culture: applying the UTAUT model, globalization, Technology Diffusion and Gender Disparity: Social Impacts of ICTs 225–246

  52. Van SC, Shim JT, Johnson R, Jiang JJ (2006) Concern for Information Privacy and Online Consumer Purchasing, Tech. rep.

  53. Tsohou A, Lee H, Irani Z (2014) Innovative public governance through cloud computing: information privacy, business models and performance measurement challenges. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 8(2):251–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Moqbel MA, Bartelt VL (2015) Consumer acceptance of personal cloud: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. AIS Transactions on Replication Research 1(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  55. AlAwadhi S, Morris A (2008) The use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of E-government Services in Kuwait. In: proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE, pp. 219–219

  56. Foster SP (2000) The digital divide: some reflections. The International Information & Library Review 32(3-4):437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. McGarr O, Gavaldon G (2018) Exploring Spanish pre-service teachers talk in relation to ICT: balancing different expectations between the university and practicum school. Technol Pedagog Educ 27(2):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Angelopoulos K, Diamantopoulou V, Mouratidis H, Pavlidis M, Salnitri M, Giorgini P, Ruiz JF (2017) A holistic approach for privacy protection in E-government. In: proceedings of the 12th international conference on availability, Reliability and Security, ACM, p. 17

  59. Sekaran U, Bougie R (2006) Research methods for business: a skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rehman M, Kamal MM, Esichaikul V (2016) Adoption of E-government Services in Pakistan: a comparative study between online and offline users. Inf Syst Manag 33(3):248–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2014) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press, Hove

    Book  Google Scholar 

  62. Churchill GA, Iacobucci D (2006) Marketing research: methodological foundations. Dryden Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schmitt A, Reimer A, Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Ehrmann D, Krichbaum M, Huber J, Haak T (2017) Depres- Sion is linked to Hyperglycaemia via suboptimal diabetes self-management: a cross-sectional mediation analysis. Journal of Pychosomatic Research 94:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amjad Mehmood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, U., Mehmood, A., Majeed, M.F. et al. Innovative Citizen’s Services through Public Cloud in Pakistan: User’s Privacy Concerns and Impacts on Adoption. Mobile Netw Appl 24, 47–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1132-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1132-x

Keywords

Navigation