Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Mathematical Model of Open Coaxial Measuring Microwave Converters

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The open coaxial sensor (OCS) enables online non-destructive testing of a wide range of objects. To solve the electrodynamics problem in the OCS design, this paper puts forward a mathematical model for an OCS with a sample located outside the sensor, and performs the theoretical calibration of the OCS in cylindrical form. The proposed method can be applied to OCSs with different forms of working area. The findings help to develop algorithms and programs for qualitative analysis on OCS features, and to compute the parameters and functions of OCS design. In addition, the analysis method can identify the basic and side effects of the qualitative level, and facilitate the construction of actual OCS designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shchegoleva T (1996) The study of biological objects in the millimeter range of radio waves. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, pp 1–182

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu S, Fu W, He L et al (2017) Distribution of primary additional errors in fractal encoding method. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5787–5802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu S, Pan Z, Fu W, Cheng X (2017) Fractal generation method based on asymptote family of generalized Mandelbrot set and its application. JNSA 10(3):1148–1161

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu S, M L, Liu G et al (2017) A novel distance metric: generalized relative entropy. Entropy 19(6):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19060269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyde MW, Havrilla MJ, Bogle AE (2016) Nondestructive determination of the permittivity tensor of a uniaxial material using a two-port clamped coaxial probe. IEEE T Microw Theory 64(1):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2015.2502242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivanov VK, Silin AO, Stadnik AM (2011) Definition of complex dielectric permeability of liquids by coaxial probes with the use of substrates from Metaterial Kharkiv. Journal of Radiophysics and Electronics 16(1):91–98

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boybay MS, Ramahi OM (2011) Open-ended coaxial line probes with negative permittivity materials. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 59(5):1765–1769. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2011.2123056

  8. Detinko MB, Hoptyar CA (1993) Electrodynamic model of microwave resonator with annular measuring hole, loaded on multilayer semiconductor structure. RUSS Phys J+ 9:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abdelgwad AH, Said TM (2015) Measured dielectric permittivity of chlorinated drinking water in the microwave frequency range. In: Microwave Symposium (MMS) IEEE 15th Mediterranean, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMS.2015.7375497

  10. Hyde MW, Havrilla MJ (2016) Broadband, nondestructive microwave sensor for characterizing magnetic sheet materials. IEEE Sensors Journal 16(12):4740–4748. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2548560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kempin M, Ghasr M, Case J, Zoughi R (2014) Modified waveguide flange for evaluation of stratified composites. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 63(6):1524–1534. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2013.2291952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cenanovic A, Schramm M, Schmidt L (2011) Measurement setup for non-destructive complex permittivity determination of solid materials using two coupled coaxial probes. IEEE MTT-S Int Microw Symp Dig:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2011.5972838

  13. Hyde MW, Bogle AE, Havrilla MJ (2014) Nondestructive characterization of PEC-backed materials using the combined measurements of a rectangular waveguide and coaxial probe. IEEE Microw Wireless Compon Lett 24(11):808–810. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2015.2502242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyde MW, Stewart JW, Havrilla MJ, Baker WP, Rothwell EJ, Nyquist DP (2009) Nondestructive electromagnetic material characterization using a dual waveguide probe: a full wave solution. Radio Sci 44:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yee LK, Hau NW, Kuan CB, Nan PY, Sheng LH, Hock LE (2015) Modeling of microwave elliptical and conical tip sensors for in vivo dielectric measurements RF and microwave. In: Conference (RFM) 2015 IEEE international, pp 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1109/RFM.2015.7587749

  16. Panchenko AY (1998) Modeling a small aperture resonator type microwave meter of substance parameters. Telecommunications and Radio Engineering 52(8):118–121. https://doi.org/10.1615/TelecomRadEng.v52.i8.80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu C, Panchenko AY, Slipchenko MI (2016) An integral equation for the field distribution within the aperture plane of the coaxial sensor. Telecommunications and Radio Engineering 75(7):587–594. https://doi.org/10.1615/TelecomRadEng.v75.i7.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu C (2016) Analysis of the properties of the integral equation for the field distribution across the aperture of a coaxial sensor. Telecommunication and Radio Engineering 75(11):969–977. https://doi.org/10.1615/TelecomRadEng.v75.i11.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding G, Wu Q, Zhang L, Lin Y, Tsiftsis TA, Yao YD (2018) An amateur drone surveillance system based on cognitive internet of things. IEEE Commun Mag 56(1):29–35 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xue Z, Wang J, Ding G, Wu Q, Lin Y, Tsiftsis TA (2018) Device-to-device communications underlying UAV-supported social networking. IEEE Access 6(1):34488–34502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Z, Guo X, Lin Y (2018) Trust management method of D2D communication based on RF fingerprint identification. IEEE Access 6:66082–66087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tu Y, Lin Y, Wang J et al (2018) Semi-supervised learning with generative adversarial networks on digital signal modulation classification. CMC-Comput Mater Con 55(2):243–254

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin Y, Li Y, Yin X et al (2018) Multisensor fault diagnosis modeling based on the evidence theory. IEEE Trans Reliab (99):1–9

  24. Sun J, Wang W, Zhang K et al (2018) A multi-focus image fusion algorithm in 5G communications. Multimed Tools Appl (3):1–20

  25. Huang R, Zhang D (2008) Analysis of open-ended coaxial probes by using a two-dimensional finite-difference frequency-domain method. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(5):931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin Y, Zhu X, Zheng Z et al (2017) The individual identification method of wireless device based on dimensionality reduction and machine learning. J Supercomput 5:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2216-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin Y, Wang C, Wang J, Dou Z (2016) A novel dynamic Spectrum access framework based on reinforcement learning for cognitive radio sensor networks. Sensors 16(10):1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner N, Schwing M, Scheuermann A (2014) Numerical 3-D FEM and experimental analysis of the open-ended coaxial line technique for microwave dielectric spectroscopy on soil. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(2):880–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Panchenko AY, Slipchenko MI, Borodkina AN (2014) On the development of a practical technique of theoretical calibration of resonant sensors for near-field microwave diagnostics. Telecommunication and Radio Engineering 73(15):1397–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang B, Tu Y, Zhang S et al (2018) Digital signal modulation classification with data augmentation using generative adversarial nets in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Access 99:1–1

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ma X, Wang T, Lin Y et al (2018) Parallel iterative inter-carrier interference cancellation in underwater acoustic orthogonal frequency division multiplexing. Wirel Pers Commun 5:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang H, Guo L, Dou Z et al (2018) A new method of cognitive signal recognition based on hybrid information entropy and D-S evidence theory. Mobile Netw Appl 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mitra R (1977) Computational methods in electrodynamics. Publishing house Mir, p 485

  34. Panchenko BA (1970) Tenzornye functions of the green equations of Maxwell for cylindrical areas. Radio Engineering 15:82–91

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tai CT (1983) Dyadic Grene's functions for a coaxial line. IEEE T Antenn Propag 48(2):355–358

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Hosseini MH, Heidar H, Shams MH (2017) Wideband nondestructive measurement of complex permittivity and permeability using coupled coaxial probes. IEEE Trans Instrumen Meas 66(1):148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mingming W, Liu C, Panchenko AY, Slipchenko MI (2015) Evaluation of influence of microwave radiation sensor in the form of an open end of the coaxial line on its metrological characteristics. Telecommunications and Radio Engineering 74(15):1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.1615/TelecomRadEng.v74.i15.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by projects of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University “XDB2014-18” and “NDJY15Z13”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Chang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, L., Panchenko, A., Nikolaevich, B.I. et al. Analysis of the Mathematical Model of Open Coaxial Measuring Microwave Converters. Mobile Netw Appl 25, 1582–1586 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01362-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01362-z

Keywords

Navigation