Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation Method of Online and Offline Hybrid Teaching Quality of Physical Education Based on Mobile Edge Computing

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to enhance the hybrid teaching of physical education online and offline, a quality evaluation method for online and offline hybrid teaching based on mobile edge computing is proposed. Through the evaluation target, index, weight of index and evaluation standard, this paper first constructs the quality evaluation index system of hybrid physical education online and offline. Then, factor and cluster analysis on the importance evaluation grade data of each index to simplify the index items are carried out. By combined with the mobile edge calculation, the weights of quality evaluation indexes for hybrid teaching are calculated respectively, and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is used to effectively realize the quality evaluation of hybrid physical education online and offline. The simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively reduce the cost and error of quality evaluation for hybrid teaching online and offline, improve the evaluation efficiency, and enhance the quality of online and offline hybrid teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Ansari A, Rushdi Arekat M, Salem AH (2018) Validating the modified system for evaluation of teaching qualities: a teaching quality assessment instrument. Adv Med Educ Pract 9:881–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alshammari E (2020) Student evaluation of teaching. Is it valid? J Adv Pharm Educ Res 10(2):96–103

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold IJM, Versluis I (2019) The influence of cultural values and nationality on student evaluation of teaching. Int J Educ Res 98:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidovi-Raki J, Kosti S (2019) Attitudes of university lecturers towards students’ evaluation of the teaching process. Зборник радова Филозофског факултета у Приштини 49(2):189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Esteban CMR, del Cerro JS (2020) Teaching quality: the satisfaction of university students with their professors: Calidad de la docencia: La satisfacción del alumnado universitario con sus profesores. Anales de Psicología 36(2):304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haw John (2018) Service quality improves students’ evaluation of good teaching. J Hosp Tour Educ 30(3):135–143

  7. Hysa E, Rehman NU (2019) Assessing the teaching quality of economics programme: instructor course evaluations. Int Educ 23(4):561–567

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawasaki J, Quartz KH, Martinez JF (2020) Using multiple measures of teaching quality to strengthen teacher preparation. Educ Policy Anal Arch 28:128–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kembuan DRE, Rompas PTD, Mintjelungan M et al (2018) Teaching quality and learning creativity in technical and vocational schools. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 306(1):2028–2035

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kovalcikiene K, Daukilas S (2018) Vocational teachers’ personality, career calling and the aspects of teaching quality. Contemp Educ Res J 8(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krzysztofik M, Zbróg P (2020) Proposing a workshop on art evaluation in university teaching. Respectus Philologicus 37(42):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyriakides E, Tsangaridou N, Charalambous CY et al (2020) Toward a more comprehensive picture of physical education teaching quality: combining generic and content-specific practices. J Teach Phys Educ 40(2):256–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laske RA (2018) Implementing peer evaluation of clinical teaching. Proquest Llc 002:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu S, Liu D, Muhammad K, Ding W (2020) Effective template update mechanism in visual tracking with background clutter. Neurocomputing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.143

  15. Liu S, Wang S, Liu X, Lin CT, Lv Z (2020) Fuzzy detection aided real-time and robust visual tracking under complex environments. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3006520

  16. Liu S, Liu D, Srivastava G, Połap D, Woźniak M (2020) Overview of correlation filter based algorithms in object tracking. Complex Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00161-4

  17. Lora C, Christine B, Linnea G et al (2018) Teaching teachers onsite: using evaluation to develop effective professional development programs. J Mus Educ 43(3):274–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nava I, Park J, Dockterman D, et al. (2019) Measuring teaching quality of secondary mathematics and science residents: a classroom observation framework. J Teach Educ 70(2):139–154

  19. Nemec EC, Baker DM, Zhang D, et al. (2018) Development of valid and reliable tools for student evaluation of teaching. Curr Pharm Teach Learn:S1877129716303392

  20. Rui B, Amp TE, School T (2019) Talking about the construction and implementation of teaching evaluation system in secondary vocational schools. J Tianjin Vocat Inst 034(002):80–82

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruiz-Alfonso Z, León, Jaime (2019) Teaching quality: relationships between passion, deep strategy to learn, and epistemic curiosity. Sch Eff Sch Improv 30(2):212–230

  22. Shuai L (2019) Introduction of key problems in long-distance learning and training. Mob Netw Appl 24(1):1–4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Shuai L, Chunli G, Fadi A et al (2020) Reliability of response region: a novel mechanism in visual tracking by edge computing for IIoT environments. Mech Syst Signal Process 138:106537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vinod G, Kais K, Suja P et al (2018) Evaluation of multidisciplinary strategies and traditional approaches in teaching pathology in medical students: evaluation of pathology teaching. Pathol Int 68(8):459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilden E, Porsch R, Schurig M (2020) An early start in primary EFL education and the role of teacher qualification and teaching quality. Lang Teach Young Learners 2(1):28–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Physical Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China

    Lei Bao

  2. College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun, China

    Ping Yu

  3. College of Computer Technology and Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun, China

    Ping Yu

Authors
  1. Lei Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ping Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Yu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, L., Yu, P. Evaluation Method of Online and Offline Hybrid Teaching Quality of Physical Education Based on Mobile Edge Computing. Mobile Netw Appl 26, 2188–2198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01774-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01774-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation