Skip to main content
Log in

Point-of-Interest Recommendation with User’s Privacy Preserving in an IoT Environment

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the popularization of smart devices and the rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT), location-based social networks (LBSNs) are growing rapidly. As a crucial personalized location service of LBSNs, point-of-interest (POI) recommendation has become a research hotspot. However, due to the use of personal information, POI recommendation system brings serious risks of privacy disclosure. Existing studies mainly focused on improving recommendation performance while ignoring privacy issues. To cope with the challenges, we propose a POI recommendation framework with users’ privacy preserving in an IoT environment based on local differential privacy (LDP). We first design an LDP-friendly POI recommendation method based on improved Hawkes process (HawkesRec) to integrate users’ long-term static and time-varying preferences. Then we put forward a privacy preserving recommendation framework based on HawkesRec and local differential privacy to protect the visited POIs and recommendation results of users. Experimental results over three real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed solution achieves better performance than other baselines and has a good capability of privacy preserving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://tech.meituan.com/2014/09/05/lucene-distance.html

  2. http://snap.stanford.edu/data/loc-gowalla.html

  3. https://nj.meituan.com

References

  1. Liu B, Yanjie F u, Yao Z, Xiong H (2013) Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 1043–1051

  2. Li H, Ge Y, Hong R, Zhu H (2016) Point-of-interest recommendations: Learning potential check-ins from friends. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 975–984

  3. Liu W, Lai H, Wang J, Ke G, Yang W, Yin J (2020) Mix geographical information into local collaborative ranking for poi recommendation. World Wide Web 23(1):131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aïmeur E, Brassard G, Fernandez JM, Onana FSM (2008) A lambic: A privacy-preserving recommender system for electronic commerce. Int J Inf Secur 7(5):307–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McSherry F, Mironov I (2009) Differentially private recommender systems: Building privacy into the netflix prize contenders. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 627–636

  6. Calandrino JA, Kilzer A, Narayanan A, Felten EW, Shmatikov V (2011) you might also like: privacy risks of collaborative filtering. In: 2011 IEEE symposium on security and privacy. IEEE, pp 231–246

  7. Shen Y, Jin H (2014) Privacy-preserving personalized recommendation: An instance-based approach via differential privacy. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on data mining. IEEE, pp 540–549

  8. Voigt P, Von dem Bussche A (2017) The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr). A Practical Guide, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. An L, Wang W, Li Z, Liu G, Li Q, Zhou X, Zhang X (2017) A privacy-preserving framework for trust-oriented point-of-interest recommendation. IEEE Access 6:393–404

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma X, Li H, Ma J, Jiang Q, Gao S, Xi N, Lu D (2017) Applet: A privacy-preserving framework for location-aware recommender system. Sci China Inform Sci 60(9):092101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen Y, Jin H (2016) Epicrec: Towards practical differentially private framework for personalized recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pp 180–191

  12. Polatidis N, Georgiadis CK, Pimenidis E, Mouratidis H (2017) Privacy-preserving collaborative recommendations based on random perturbations. Expert Syst Appl 71:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng X, Luo Y, Ji Z, Sun L, Chen F (2018) A novel differential privacy recommendation method based on a distributed framework. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, pp 1332–1339

  14. Zhou H, Yang G, Xu Y, Wang W (2019) Effective matrix factorization for recommendation with local differential privacy. In: International conference on science of cyber security. Springer, pp 235–249

  15. Okkalioglu BD, Okkalioglu M, Koc M, Polat H (2015) A survey: Deriving private information from perturbed data. Artif Intell Rev 44(4):547–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shin H, Kim S, Shin J, Xiao X (2018) Privacy enhanced matrix factorization for recommendation with local differential privacy. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(9):1770–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu Y, Chen X (2015) A survey of point-of-interest recommendation in location-based social networks. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

  18. Kasiviswanathan SP, Lee HK, Nissim K, Raskhodnikova S, Smith A (2011) What can we learn privately? SIAM J Comput 40(3):793–826

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin Z, Yang Y, Ting Y u, Khalil I, Xiao X, Ren K (2016) Heavy hitter estimation over set-valued data with local differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pp 192–203

  20. Wang S, Huang L, Nie Y, Wang P, Xu H, Yang W (2018) Privset: Set-valued data analyses with locale differential privacy. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE conference on computer communications. IEEE, pp 1088–1096

  21. Ren X, Yu C-M, Yu W, Yang S, Yang X, McCann JA, Yu Philip S (2018) Lopub: High-dimensional crowdsourced data publication with local differential privacy. IEEE Trans Inform Forens Secur 13 (9):2151–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duchi JC, Jordan MI, Wainwright MJ (2013) Local privacy and Statistical minimax rates. In: 2013 IEEE 54th annual symposium on foundations of computer science. IEEE, pp 429–438

  23. Warner SL (1965) Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc 60(309):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang M, Lyu L, Zhoa J, Zhu T, Lam K-Y (2020) Local differential privacy and its applications: A comprehensive survey. arXiv:2008.03686

  25. Ye QQ, Meng XF, Zhu MJ, Huo Z (2018) Survey on local differential privacy. J Softw 29(7):159–183

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Laub PJ, Taimre T, Pollett PK (2015) Hawkes processes. arXiv:1507.02822

  27. Frahm G (2018) How often is the financial market going to collapse. Q Financ Econ 2(3):590–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Y, Pan H, Li T, Yu W u (2014) Modification of huff model and its application in urban commercial network planning: a case of changzhou city, jiangsu province. Arid Land Geography 4:802–811

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang J-D, Chow C-Y (2015) Spatiotemporal sequential influence modeling for location recommendations: A gravity-based approach. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 7(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang G, Qi L, Zhang X, Xu X, Dou W (2019) Context-aware point-of-interest recommendation algorithm with interpretability. In: International conference on collaborative computing: Networking, applications and worksharing. Springer, pp 745–759

  31. Yang D, Zhang D, Zheng VW, Yu Z (2014) Modeling user activity preference by leveraging user spatial temporal characteristics in lbsns. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 45(1):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang T, Blocki J, Li N, Jha S (2017) Locally differentially private protocols for frequency estimation. In: 26th USENIX Security Symposium), pp 729–745

  33. Furukawa J (2013) Request-based comparable encryption. In: European symposium on research in computer security. Springer, pp 129–146

  34. Zheng X, Luo Y, Ji Z, Sun L, Chen F (2018) A novel differential privacy recommendation method based on a distributed framework. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, pp 1332–1339

  35. Kang W-C, McAuley J (2018) Self-attentive sequential recommendation. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference On Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, pp 197–206

  36. Wang J, Ding K, Hong L, Liu H, Caverlee J (2020) Next-item recommendation with sequential hypergraphs. In: Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp 1101–1110

  37. He X, Liao L, Zhang H, Nie L, Xia H u, Chua T-S (2017) Neural collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web, pp 173–182

  38. Lian D, Zhao C, Xie X, Sun G, Chen E, Rui Y (2014) Geomf: Joint geographical modeling and matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 831–840

  39. Zhang J-D, Chow C-Y (2015) Core: Exploiting the personalized influence of two-dimensional geographic coordinates for location recommendations. Inf Sci 293:163–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ye M, Yin P, Lee W-C (2010) Location recommendation for location-based social networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, pp 458–461

  41. Yuan Q, Cong G, Ma Z, Sun A, Thalmann NM (2013) Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp 363–372

  42. Ying JJ-C, Lee W-C, Tseng VS (2014) Mining geographic-temporal-semantic patterns in trajectories for location prediction. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 5(1):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng VW, Zheng Y u, Xie X, Yang Q (2012) Towards mobile intelligence: Learning from gps history data for collaborative recommendation. Artif Intell 184:17–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Kurashima T, Iwata T, Hoshide T, Takaya N, Ko F (2013) Geo topic model: Joint modeling of user’s activity area and interests for location recommendation. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pp 375–384

  45. Jiao X, Xiao Y, Zheng W, Xu L, Wu H (2019) Exploring spatial and mobility pattern’s effects for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. IEEE Access 7:158917–158930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xingyi R, Meina S, Junde S (2017) Point-of-interest recommendation based on the user check-in behavior. Chinese J Comput 40(1):28–51

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nikolaenko V, Ioannidis S, Weinsberg U, Joye M, Taft N, Boneh D (2013) Privacy-preserving matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer & communications security, pp 801–812

  48. Badsha S, Yi X, Khalil I, Bertino E (2017) Privacy preserving user-based recommender system. In: 2017 IEEE 37Th international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS). IEEE, pp 1074–1083

  49. Tang Q, Wang J (2016) Privacy-preserving friendship-based recommender systems. IEEE Trans Depend Secure Comput 15(5):784–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61672276, the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2017YFB1400600, Jiangsu Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. BE2019104, Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. BK20171037, and the Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization, Nanjing University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanchun Dou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Qi, L., Zhang, X. et al. Point-of-Interest Recommendation with User’s Privacy Preserving in an IoT Environment. Mobile Netw Appl 26, 2445–2460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01784-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01784-8

Keywords

Navigation