Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Smart Edge Computing for 5 g/6 g Satellite IOT for Reducing Inter Transmission Delay

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

5G/6G communication are first generation high speed wireless communication network which integrates the aerial data, terrestrial data and maritime data via satellite to IoT cellular devices. Technological motivation tends to increase the satellites day by day for supporting most of global applications. These applications highly relay on satellite data for processing users request and giving appropriate outcome to the users. World grows very fastly with new technologies which makes demand for fastest data communication. Handling the satellite IoT data is worthiest research problem and it must be paid with more attention. At present inter satellite communication face high delay with lower data utilization rate. The effective utilization of data generated by satellite IoT is processed using our proposed intelligent model called smart edge computing (SEC-5G) for 5G. The SEC-5G embeds with satellite for reducing the data transfer limitation and delay in inter satellite communication. In this research we highly concentrate on satellite IoT data and its problem. Our proposed system reduces the limitation in inter satellite data communication rate which makes higher delay in data processing and utilization. In this article, smart edge computing is designed for satellite IoT using SDN/NFV and deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) with logical ring construction. The task uses SDN/NFV model to choose edge node, cloud node in the smart edge computing. Based on training data, DCNN works on SEC-5G software model. Smart architecture helps to increase the performance, scalability, reliability of satellite edge computing model. This architecture works with machine learning model and helps to improve the future satellite speed on data processing. The performance of the proposed is compared with existing Ground 5G. Evaluated outcome shows proposed embedded satellite outperforms in data communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shancang L, Da Xu L, Zhao S (2015) The internet of things: a survey. Inform Syst Front 17(2):243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Razzaque MA, Milojevic-Jevric M, Palade A, Clarke S (2015) Middleware for internet of things: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J 3(1):70–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luigi A, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: A survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coverage Maps. 2019. Available online: https://opensignal.com/networks

  5. Zhicheng Q, Zhang G, Cao H, Xie J (2017) LEO satellite constellation for Internet of Things. IEEE Access 5:18391–18401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanctis D, Ernestina Cianca M, Araniti G, Bisio L, Prasad R (2015) Satellite communications supporting internet of remote things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3(1):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Markus M, Calvanese Strinati E, Kim G, Clemente A, Baptiste Dore J, De Domenico A, Kim T (2016) 5G CHAMPION-Rolling out 5G in 2018. 2016 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pp. 1–6. IEEE

  8. Krebs, G.D. Chronology of Space Launches, 2019. https://space.skyrocket.de/directories/chronology.htm

  9. Giambene G, Kota S, Pillai P (2018) Satellite-5g integration: A network perspective. IEEE Netw 32:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JP, Joo C (2015) Challenges for efficient and seamless space-terrestrial heterogeneous networks. IEEE Commun Mag 53:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kak A; Guven E; Ergin UE; Akyildiz IF (2018) Performance Evaluation of SDN-Based Internet of Space Things. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 9–13

  12. Wang H; Niu D; Li B (2019) Distributed Machine Learning with a Serverless Architecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2019—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Paris, France, 29 April–2 May pp. 1288–1296

  13. Li M (2014) Scaling distributed machine learning with the parameter server. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Big Data Science and Computing, Beijing, China, 6–8 October; pp. 583–598

  14. Technical, B.R. Bringing HPC Techniques to Deep Learning. 2017. Available online: http://andrew.gibiansky.com/blog/machine-learning/baidu-allreduce/ (accessed on 21 February 2017)

  15. Sergeev A; Balso MD Horovod: Fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.05799

  16. Developers PP (2019) Available online: https://github.com/PaddlePaddle (accessed on 20 September 2019)

  17. Alibaba. Mobile Neural Network. 2019. Available online: https://github.com/alibaba/MNN (accessed on 20 September 2019)

  18. Yerabgerco.olu, S.; Kim, S.; Gomena, S.; Li, X.; Patel, R.; Bhise, S.; Aryafar, E. DeepMarket: An Edge Computing Marketplace with Distributed TensorFlow Execution Capability. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2019—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Paris, France, 29 April–2 May 2019; pp. 32–37

  19. Jiang, H.; Starkman, J.; Lee, Y.; Chen, H.; Qian, X.; Huang, M. Distributed Deep Learning Optimized System over the Cloud and Smart Phone Devices. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 2019

  20. Li, E.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, X. Edge intelligence: On-demand deep learning model co-inference with device-edge synergy. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Mobile Edge Communications, MECOMM 2018, Budapest, Hungary, 20 August 2018; pp. 31–36

  21. Li H, Ota K, Dong M (2018) Learning IoT in Edge: Deep Learning for the Internet of Things with Edge Computing. IEEE Netw 32:96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim, J.; Seo, J.; Baek, Y. CamThings: IoT Camera with Energy-E_cient Communication by Edge Computing based on Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC 2018), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 21–23 November 2018; pp. 1–6

  23. Plastiras, G.; Terzi, M.; Kyrkou, C.; Theocharidcs, T. Edge Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities of Near-Sensor Machine Learning Applications. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Application-Specific Systems, Architectures and Processors (ASAP 2018), Milan, Italy, 10–12 July 2018; pp. 1–7

  24. Tu, S., Waqas, M., Rehman, S.U., Mir, T., Halim, Z. and Ahmad, I, “Social Phenomena and Fog Computing Networks: A Novel Perspective for Future Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2021

  25. Wan, J., Waqas, M., Tu, S., Hussain, S.M., Shah, A., Rehman, S.U. and Hanif, M., An “Efficient Impersonation Attack Detection Method in Fog Computing,” CMC-Comput Mater Cont, vol.68, no.1, pp.267–281, 2021

  26. Sulaiman M, Halim Z, Waqas M, Aydın D (2021) A hybrid list-based task scheduling scheme for heterogeneous computing. J Supercomput:1–37

  27. Sulaiman M, Halim Z, Lebbah M, Waqas M, Tu S (2021) An evolutionary computing-based efficient hybrid task scheduling approach for heterogeneous computing environment. J Grid Comput 19(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Waqas M, Niu Y, Ahmed M, Li Y, Jin D, Han Z (2018) Mobility-aware fog computing in dynamic environments: Understandings and implementation. IEEE Access 7:38867–38879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tu S, Waqas M, Rehman SU, Aamir M, Rehman OU, Jianbiao Z, Chang CC (2018) Security in fog computing: A novel technique to tackle an impersonation attack. IEEE Access 6:74993–75001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Keshavarzi A, Van Den Hoek W (2019) Edge Intelligence—On the Challenging Road to a Trillion Smart Connected IoT Devices. IEEE Des Test 36:41–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Paolucci, P.S.; Ammendola, R.; Biagioni, A.; Frezza, O.; Cicero, F.L.; Lonardo, A.; Martinelli, M.; Pastorelli, E.; Simula, F.; Vicini, P. Power, energy and speed of embedded and server multi-cores applied to distributed simulation of spiking neural networks: Arm in nvidia tegra vs intel xeon quad-cores. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1505.03015

  32. Mavridis I, Karatza H (2019) Combining containers and virtual machines to enhance isolation and extend functionality on cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst 94:674–69639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pease C, Shostak ME, Lamport RL (1980) Reaching agreement in the presence of faults. J ACM 27:228–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Lei Yan, Suzhi Cao, Yongsheng Gong, Hao Han, Junyong Wei, Yi Zhao and Shuling Yang, “SatEC: A 5G Satellite Edge Computing Framework Based on Microservice Architecture”, MDPI, Sensors 2019, 19, 831; doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040831

  35. Ricart-Sanchez R, Malagon P, Salva-Garcia P, Perez EC, Wang Q, Calero JMA (2018) Towards an fpga-accelerated programmable data path for edge-to-core communications in 5G networks. J Netw Comput Appl 124:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Junyong Wei , Jiarong Han and Suzhi Cao, “Satellite IoT Edge Intelligent Computing: A Research on Architecture”, MDPI, Electronics 2019, 8, 1247; doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8111247

  37. Guidotti, A.; Vanelli-Coralli, A.; Caus, M.; Bas, J.; Colavolpe, G.; Foggi, T.; Cioni, S.; Modenini, A.; Tarchi, D. Satellite-Enabled Lte Systems in leo Constellations. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Paris, France, 21–25 May 2017; pp. 876–881

  38. Valenzuela-Valdés, J.F.; González-Macías, Á.P.; Valenzuela-Valdés, J.C.; Padilla, A.; Luna-Valero, P.F. On the ultra-dense small cell deployment for 5G networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 5G World Forum (5GWF), Silicon Valley, CA, USA, 9–11 July 2018; pp. 369–372

  39. Simonyan, K.; Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv 2014, arXiv:14091556

  40. He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 770–778

  41. Zagoruyko, S.; Komodakis, N. Wide Residual Networks. arXiv 2016, arXiv:160507146

  42. Howard, A.G.; Zhu, M.; Bo, C.; Kalenichenko, D.; Wang, W.; Weyand, T.; Andreetto, M.; Adam, H. MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications. arXiv 2017, arXiv:170404861

  43. Zhang, X.; Zhou, X.; Lin, M.; Sun, J. ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018; pp. 6848–6856

  44. Huang, G.; Liu, Z.; Van Der Maaten, L.; Weinberger, K.Q. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 2261–2269

Download references

Availability of data and material (data transparency)

Not applicable.

*Code availability (software application or custom code)

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Sceince, Lebanese French University, Erbil, KR, Iraq

    Amin Salih Mohammed

  2. Department of Software and Informatics Engineering, Salahaddin University, Erbil, KR, Iraq

    Amin Salih Mohammed

  3. Department of Applied Cybernetics, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Králové, 50003, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

    K. Venkatachalam & S. Hubálovský

  4. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Králové, 50003, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

    P. Trojovský

  5. Department of Computer Sceince, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, 560074, India

    P. Prabu

Authors
  1. Amin Salih Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Venkatachalam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Hubálovský
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Trojovský
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Prabu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Venkatachalam.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests (include appropriate disclosures)

Enclosed separate disclosure.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammed, A.S., Venkatachalam, K., Hubálovský, S. et al. Smart Edge Computing for 5 g/6 g Satellite IOT for Reducing Inter Transmission Delay. Mobile Netw Appl 27, 1050–1059 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01860-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01860-z

Key words

Search

Navigation