Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application for deinterlacing method using edge direction classification and fuzzy inference system

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an advanced deinterlacing method which uses filters to estimate the edge direction using luminance information. Subsequently, we are able to obtain the luminance values at for missing pixels. The fuzzy logic concept for image processing is discussed with regard to fuzzy membership function representation and fuzzy inference procedures. The fuzzy if-then rules are employed to conduct the determining edge direction. The use of a different membership function for different direction enables the filter to independently characterize separate influences on pixel variation. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method has an enhanced performance, both visually and in terms of the peak signal-to-noise ratio, compared with those of conventional deinterlacing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellers EB, De Haan G (2000) De-interlacing: a key technology for scan rate conversion. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bothorrel S, Bouchon B, Muller S (1997) A fuzzy logic-based approach for semiological analysis of microcalcification in mammographic images. Int J Intell Syst 12:819–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brox P, Baturone I, Sanchez-Solano S, Gutierrez-Rios J, Fernandez-Hernandez F (2007) A fuzzy edge-dependent motion adaptive algorithm for de-interlacing. Fuzzy Sets Syst 158(3):337–347

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen P-Y, Lai Y-H (2007) A low-complexity interpolation method for deinterlacing. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E90-D(2):606–608

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen T, Wu HR, Yu ZH (2000) Efficient deinterlacing algorithm using edge-based line average interpolation. Opt Eng 39(8):2101–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Haan G (2007) Television display processing: past & future. In: Proc. IEEE ICCE2007, pp 1–2

  7. De Haan G, Bellers EB (1997) De-interlacing of video data. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 43(3):819–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Doyle T (1990) Interlaced to sequential conversion for EDTV applications. In: Proc. 2nd int. workshop signal processing of HDTV, pp 412–430

  9. Jack K (2005) Video demystified—a handbook for the digital engineer, 4th edn. Elsevier, Jordan Hill, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeon G, Jeong J (2006) Designing Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model-based motion adaptive deinterlacing system. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 52(3):1013–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeon G, Jeong J (2007) Fuzzy rule and Bayesian network based line interpolation for video deinterlacing. IEICE Trans Commun E90-B(6):1495–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim W, Jin S, Jeong J (2007) Novel intra deinterlacing algorithm using content adaptive interpolation. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 53(3):1036–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee D-H (2008) A new edge-based intra-field interpolation method for deinterlacing using locally adaptive-thresholded binary image. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 54(1):110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li R, Zeng B, Liou L (2000) Reliable motion detection/compensation for interlaced sequences and its applications to deinterlacing. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 10(1):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Y, Deng J-M, Wei M-Y (2002) Meaning and precision of adaptive fuzzy systems with Gaussian-type membership functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 127(1):85–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Michaud F, Le Dinh CT, Lachiver G (1997) Fuzzy detection of edge-direction for video line doubling. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 7(3):539–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohammadi HM, Langlois P, Savaria Y (2007) A five-field motion compensated deinterlacing method based on vertical motion. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 53(3):1117–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nachtegael M, Kerre EE (2001) Connections between binary, gray-scale and fuzzy mathematical morphologies. Fuzzy Sets Syst 124(1):73–85

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Park MK, Kang MG, Nam K, Oh SG (2003) New edge dependent deinterlacing algorithm based on horizontal edge pattern. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 49(4):1508–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reusch B, Fathi M, Hildebrand L (1988) Soft computing, multimedia and image processing-proceedings of the world automation congress. Albuquerque, NM, ch. Fuzzy color processing for quality improvement. TSI Press, pp 841–848

  21. Ronsefeld A (1994) Survey: image analysis and computer vision; 1993. Comput Vis Image Underst 59(3):367–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugiyama K, Nakamura H (1999) A method of de-interlacing with motion compensation interpolation. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 45(3):611–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas G (1998) A comparison of motion-compensated interlace-to-progressive conversion methods. Signal Process Image Commun 12:209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van De Ville D, Philips W, Lemahieu I (2000) Fuzzy techniques in image processing, vol 52. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, ch. Fuzzy-based motion detection and its application to de-interlacing. Springer, New York, pp 337–369

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoo H, Jeong J (2002) Direction-oriented interpolation and its application to de-interlacing. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 48(4):954–962

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Seoul Future Contents Convergence (SFCC) Cluster established by Seoul R&BD Program (10570).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Technology and Engineering (SITE), University of Ottawa, 800 King Edward, P.O. Box 450, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1N 6N5

    Gwanggil Jeon

  2. Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Korea

    Sang-Jun Park & Jechang Jeong

  3. College of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Shaanxi, Yangling, 712100, China

    Yong Fang

  4. R&D Center / AV Algorithm Group, Telechips Inc., KORAD Bldg, 1000-12, Daechi-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, Korea

    Rokkyu Lee

Authors
  1. Gwanggil Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sang-Jun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rokkyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jechang Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwanggil Jeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeon, G., Park, SJ., Fang, Y. et al. Application for deinterlacing method using edge direction classification and fuzzy inference system. Multimed Tools Appl 59, 149–168 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0694-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0694-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation